# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_2013_S444
# Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration)

14
22
1

Neither Disagree Nor Agree

Agree

Strongly Agree

2013 Convention Workbook
2
3
25
14

Disagree

Neither Disagree Nor Agree

Agree

Strongly Agree

1
3
24
16

Disagree

Neither Disagree Nor Agree

Agree

Strongly Agree

27

35

11

3

5

2011

26

37

4

10

4

2011

5

38

16

16

The table below depicts the responses to this survey statement by the 81 supervising pastors who responded in
the fall of 2011.

3

Strongly Disagree

30. I would recommend enrolling in the SMP program to someone
contemplating it.
Response
2010

3

Strongly Disagree

29. Thus far, I have a positive overall reaction to the SMP program.
Response
2010

6

Disagree

86

8
2

Agree
Strongly Agree

0

10

3

0

0

0
1
1
8

Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Disagree Nor Agree
Agree

10

2

0

1

11

0

1

1

2. The printed information clearly explained the admission process.
Response
2009
2010
2011

3

1

Disagree
Neither Disagree Nor Agree

0

Strongly Disagree

6

12

0

1

0

1. The process of demonstrating entry-level competence was easily understood.
Response
2009
2010
2011

District President Survey Results (only district presidents who have students enrolled in SMP)

87

444
Specific Ministry Pastor (SMP) Task Force