# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_2007_S163 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) SYNOD STRUCTURE AND GOVERNANCE To Affirm Christian Resolution of Disputes RESOLUTION 8-02A Overtures 8-05–10, L8-72 (CW, pp. 259–261) WHEREAS, God has clearly stated in 1 Cor. 6 His intent that brothers and sisters in the faith not enter into lawsuits against one another: If any of you has a dispute with another, dare he take it before the ungodly judgment instead of before the saints? Do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if you are to judge the world, are you not competent to judge trivial cases? Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things in this life! Therefore, if you have disputes about such matters, appoint as judges even men of little account in the church! I say this to shame you. Is it possible that there is nobody among you wise enough to judge a dispute between believers? But instead, one brother goes to law against another—and this in front of unbelievers! The very fact that you have lawsuits among you means you have been completely defeated already. Why not rather be wronged? Why not rather be cheated? Instead, you yourselves cheat and do wrong, and you do this to your brothers (1 Cor. 6:1–8). and WHEREAS, The early church provides a model in Acts 15 for settling disputes without resorting to charges and accusations; and WHEREAS, The Synod, in walking together, has agreed to abide by the exclusive and final remedy for resolving conflict among its members provided in the Bylaws: 1.10.1 When disputes, disagreements, or offenses arise among members of the body of Christ, it is a matter of grave concern for the whole Church. Conflicts that occur in the body should be resolved promptly (Matt. 5:23, 24; Eph. 4:26–27). Parties are urged by the mercies of God to proceed with one another with “the same attitude that was in Christ Jesus” (Phil. 2:5). In so doing, individuals, congregations, and various agencies within the Synod are urged to reject a win-lose attitude that typifies secular conflict. For the sake of the Gospel, the church should spare no resource in providing assistance. 1.10.1.1 The Holy Scriptures (1 Cor. 6:1–7) urge Christians to settle their differences by laying them before the “members of brotherhood.” Therefore, the Synod, in the spirit of 1 Corinthians 6, calls upon all parties to a disagreement, accusation, controversy, or disciplinary action to rely exclusively and fully on the Synod’s system of reconciliation and conflict resolution. The use of the Synod’s conflict resolution procedures shall be the exclusive and final remedy for those who are in dispute [emphasis added]. Fitness for ministry and other theological matters must be determined within the church. Parties are urged, in matters of a doctrinal nature, to follow the procedures as outlined in Bylaw 1.8; and WHEREAS, The Synod, in Bylaw 1.10.3, has defined certain exceptions to the fact that the dispute resolution process is to be the exclusive and final remedy for those who are in dispute; and WHEREAS, The Synod, through the Commission on Theology and Church Relations, has previously addressed this 163 issue in the Commission on Theology and Church Relations Report of April 1991, 1 Cor. 6:1–11, An Exegetical Study; and WHEREAS, Opinion 05-2444 of the Commission on Constitutional Matters (CW, p. 320), adopted at the Nov. 28–29, 2005, meeting of the commission, states: • “All members of the Synod are required to resolve all matters of dissent or all disputes by the avenues and structures available to them as set forth in the Constitution and Bylaws of the Synod without resorting to secular courts and without resorting to avenues, means, structures, or communications that are foreign or contrary to the synodical agreements and which are not in harmony with the polity of the Synod.” • “A lawsuit is not a legitimate avenue of dissent. In the agreement to live and work together, a member of the Synod is required to follow the avenue of dissent as set forth in Bylaw section 1.8, including honoring and upholding the resolutions of the Synod. While a lawsuit may be an appropriate process in which to resolve a dispute in the secular world, members of the Synod are governed by Bylaw section 1.8 as the required, exclusive, and agreed-to avenue of dissent and Bylaw section 1.10 as the required, exclusive, and agreed-to method of dispute resolution.” • “In the agreement to live and work together, a member of the Synod is required to rely exclusively and fully on the Synod’s system of reconciliation and conflict resolution. Unless the dispute is one concerning property rights or contract arrangements under Bylaw 1.10.3 (a) or (b), such suit would be a gross violation of the process of Bylaw section 1.10 and the covenants which bind members together in the Synod. The use of the Synod’s conflict resolution procedures is the exclusive and final remedy for those who are in dispute (Bylaw section 1.10).” and WHEREAS, Our witness to the world is affected by the way we conduct ourselves when we have a disagreement with a brother or sister in Christ; therefore be it Resolved, That the members of The Lutheran Church— Missouri Synod honor their commitment to utilize the Synod’s dispute resolution process as the exclusive and final remedy to resolve any disputes, conflicts, disagreements, or offenses within the Synod; and be it further Resolved, That we commend to the members of the Synod the April 1991 CTCR document, 1 Cor. 6:1–11, An Exegetical Study for study and guidance. Action: Adopted (6) (After the entire resolution was read by the committee, and after discussion, the resolution was adopted as presented by the committee [Yes: 665; No: 341]. To Provide Wording for Congregations’ Constitutions and Bylaws RESOLUTION 8-04 Overtures 8-60–66 (CW, pp. 280–283) WHEREAS, Article V of the Constitution states, “Membership in the Synod is held and may be acquired by con2007 Convention Proceedings