# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_2007_S76 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 76 REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT valid and proper, I have asked seven national Synod leaders to confer together to review the procedure followed by district boards of directors and the president of the Synod regarding circuit electoral delegate exceptions to the 2007 convention. Their report is due to be completed by May 15 and will be sent to all voting delegates. Their report is now complete, has been sent to all voting delegates, and is attached as Appendix I to this Report of the President. Summarily, the report stated that no evidence was found of collaboration between the office of the President of the Synod and the presidents and boards of directors of the districts regarding the seating of delegates to the 2007 convention and that the 65 electoral circuit exceptions granted for the 2007 convention of the Synod were granted according to the provisions of Bylaw 3.1.2. The committee also “recognizes that a comprehensive study of concerns associated with the Synod’s delegate representation process is needed” and is aware that the topic of fair representation at national conventions is included in the overall study currently underway by the Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and Governance. The bottom line is that convention delegates and the Synod itself can rest assured that there was nothing improper or inappropriate that occurred in the process of requesting or granting approval of bylaw-allowed exceptions for circuit electoral delegates. All voting delegates to every Synod convention, including the 2007 convention, have been legitimately and properly elected and certified in accordance with the covenants of love by which we have all agreed to abide. The concluding paragraph of my special report regarding the lawsuit (written March 10, 2007) states, At the time of writing of this report, some of the original participants and plaintiffs in the lawsuit are engaged in an effort to communicate to delegates to this convention concerning topics in the lawsuit in a way that misrepresents the truth and casts aspersions on the integrity and motives of district boards of directors and officers of the Synod. I truly hope and fervently pray that God’s Spirit will touch the hearts of those involved in this endeavor, that all would work and walk together in a way that builds harmony and peace in our Synod, not divisiveness and contention. That remains my hope and prayer. Suggestions for Floor Committee Consideration As has been the custom for many years, I believe it is appropriate to offer general recommendations for floor committee consideration. This has been the precedent set by Synod presidents in the past. I follow this precedent with the assurance of my absolute trust and complete confidence in you, the leaders and members of the floor committees entrusted with the responsibility of forming and fashioning the resolutions to be presented to the convention of our Synod in the weeks ahead. Here are a few general comments and recommendations for your consideration as you undertake this significant responsibility. Floor Committee 1—Missions Many in our Synod share with me a deep concern about the decline in baptized membership of the congregations of 2007 Convention Proceedings the Synod over the past 35 or more years. This trend sounds an alarm of the corresponding plight of many, many people who are dying every day without saving faith in Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord. Simultaneously, it remains God’s desire for “all to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.” The clearly stated mission of the LCMS, “vigorously to make known the love of Christ,” is intent on God’s purpose. It is the heartbeat of our existence and gives direction for our life as a church body. The formidable fiscal, spiritual, and human resources of our Synod must be focused on God’s mission as we address the regrettable and unacceptable decline in baptized members in the congregations of our Synod—for this decline is a manifestation of more people leaving the Synod through death or defection than those who join our congregations through infant and adult Baptisms, adult confirmations, and professions of faith. Most important is our concern about the horrifying dilemma that some of the people who leave our congregations represent souls lost for all eternity. So we faithfully pursue the many opportunities for mission that exist in our country and world that we “might win some” for Christ. Numerous individuals, congregations, districts, entities, institutions, auxiliaries, recognized service organizations, and mission societies of the Synod are involved in intentional mission efforts of many kinds, including global mission endeavors, some but not all in partnership with LCMS World Mission. Many are experiencing direct, hands-on mission involvement, primarily through short-term mission events, both locally and globally. My counsel is for Floor Committee 1 to consider resolutions that would • affirm the priority of mission involvement in coordination with LCMS World Mission; • explore ways and means of expanding our worldwide mission impact in fiscally prudent and biblically acceptable avenues; • encourage mission planting in the United States by “covenant congregations” in collaboration with district mission leaders; • encourage the objectives of congregation revitalization toward the goal of every LCMS congregation as a “mission outpost”; and • affirm the role of the priesthood of all believers in partnership with pastors and other church leaders in the mission of our Synod. Floor Committee 2—District and Congregational Services A primary focus of Committee 2 will most likely be provision of proper and adequate resources to congregations and professional church workers of the LCMS by the national Synod and its districts. Close and careful coordination of work currently accomplished at the district and national Synod level is necessary for faithful stewardship of the precious resources entrusted to our care. Many of our pastors and educators are inadequately compensated, some living at or near poverty levels. They serve in the midst of people who are richly blessed and, under most circumstances, are eager to be of service and in mission with their people in meaningful ways.