# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_2004_S460 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 460 OTHER PERTINENT DOCUMENTS voted labor in support of the ministry of the Gospel. “If women kept silence in the public worship of the church (1 Cor. 14:34), they certainly did not remain inactive in the work of the church.”'' The apostle’s friendship and the warmth of his affection must have been a source of great encouragement to these men and women who had toiled hard with him in the service of Christ and His church. The biblical restraints regarding the service of women in the church and the authority of the pastoral office need not become the only, or even predominant, word we speak to one another. To speak of the “eligibility” of the service of women in congregational and synodical offices might give the impression to some that our pri- mary concern in the contemporary church is to discourage women from exercising the privileges and responsibilities they hold as members of the priesthood of believers. Men and women alike, however, need to help one another, first of all, to see that God’s Word itself provides standards of “eligibility” for service in offices of the church, and it does so without any diminution of the value of persons. But just as important, God’s people must be instruments of daily encouragement to one another and help each other to discover and appreciate the joys of Christian service. All of us would do well to emulate the apostle Paul’s example in giving words of sup- port and commendation to fellow workers in the church of God. It is the prayer of the Commission that this brief report will as- sist the members of the Synod in understanding and faithfully ap- plying what the Scriptures teach about the service of women in var- ious positions of assigned responsibility. May our beloved Lord continue to guide and bless our deliberations and decisions in this area, to the end that we remain faithful to His will regarding the ministry of Word and sacraments and our life of Christian service. APPENDIX The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, after a number of years of careful study and deliberation, decided at its 1969 convention “to grant women suffrage and board membership.”'* In that deci- sion the Synod stated that it understood those statements of Scrip- ture which pertain:to the service of women in the church (specifi- cally, 1 Corinthians 11, 14; 1 Timothy 2) to mean that “women ought not to hold the pastoral office or serve in any other capacity involving the distinctive functions of this office.” Regarding of- fices and board membership the Synod went on to state its belief that women are prohibited from holding any other kind of office or membership on boards or committees in the institutional structures of a congregation, only if such a way of proceeding involves women in a violation of this principle. Accordingly, the Synod held, the pertinent scriptural texts do not prohibit full membership of women on synodical boards, commissions, and committees, nor is the manner of filling an office or establishing membership on a board or commission, in congregations or in the Synod under any scriptural prohibition. With respect to woman suffrage, which con- gregations without scriptural prohibition are free to adopt, and the matter of congregational offices and board membership, the Synod concluded that congregations are free to alter their policies and practice, provided the polity developed conforms to the scriptural principles informing the Synod’s position regarding the pastoral of- fice. The Synod recognized the sensitivity of this issue and there- fore urged “cautious and deliberate action in the spirit of Christian love” if changes are implemented. Following this action by the Synod in 1969, the President of the Synod and a number of congregations asked that guidance be given by the Commission on Constitutional Matters (CCM) to congrega- tions desiring to incorporate into their constitutions and bylaws the provisions adopted in Resolution 2-17. In 1970 the CCM issued “Suggestions for Congregational Constitutions or Bylaws Regard- ing the Privileges of Women (Voting and Holding Office).”'* Re- Stricting itself to the position taken by the Synod (“de iure humano rather than de iure divino, by human right rather than divine right”), 2004 Convention Workbook and assuming that the Synod “may further define its position in the future, thereby making it necessary perhaps to refine the sugges- tions being offered herewith,” the CCM offered a sample constitu- tional paragraph under the title ‘Privileges of Women.” This para- graph allows, in addition to franchise, that women may “serve as officers and as members of boards and committees as long as these positions are not directly involved in the specific functions of the pastoral office (preaching, the public administration of the sacra- ments, church discipline) and as long as this service does not vio- late the order of creation (usurping authority over men).” The para- graph then concludes (footnotes bracketed): “Accordingly, they shall not serve as pastor, as a member of [Here shall be listed the board of elders or corresponding board directly involved in the functions of the pastoral office], as chairman or vice-chairman of the congregation, or as chairman of [Here the congregation may list at its discretion those major policy and decision-making boards or standing committees, if any, whose chairmanship the congrega- tion may wish to restrict to men].” The Synod affirmed this posi- tion as stated in the CCM opinion in 1981'4 and again in 1986.'5 In response to inquiries regarding the eligibility of women for service in congregational offices, the Commission on Theology and Church Relations addressed itself briefly to this matter in its 1985 report on Women in the Church: Scriptural Principles and Eccle- sial Practice. The Commission replied to the question “May women hold office in a congregation, serve on committees of the congregation, chair committees of the congregation?” by stating the following: Women may hold any office and serve on any committee of the congregation which enhances the work of the priesthood of all be- lievers. Women also have the privilege to chair congregational committees, since a “chair” does not “have authority over men” any more than the committee per se would have such authority in the New Testament sense. The only stricture would have to do with anyone whose official functions would involve public accountabil- ity for the function of the pastoral office (e.g., elders, and possibly the chairman of the congregation). The tasks of the elders in a con- gregation are often directly associated with the pastoral office and the public administration of the office of the keys. As stated in the introductory paragraph to this section, everything depends on the nature of functions assigned to various offices established by the church. The same general position outlined above applies to various dis- trict or synodical committees and commissions. Affairs of the church have never been assigned only to those holding the office of the public ministry. Women offer valuable contributions to the work of such committees, boards, and commissions." Taking into account its previously stated positions, the CTCR’s counsel, and questions and concems raised about the eligibility of women for service in congregational offices, the Synod at its 1989 convention adopted Resolution 3-13A “To Study and Clarify Ser- vices of Women in Congregational and Synodical Offices.” The Synod specifically asked “that the CTCR, in consultation with the Council of Presidents, prepare a study on the eligibility of women for service in all offices of the congregation, including that of chair- man, vice-chairman, and elder and district and synodical boards and commissions where their official function would in effect in- volve public accountability for the function(ing) of the pastoral of- fice.”"” Adopted by the CTCR on November 16, 1994 ENDNOTES 1. See Appendix. 2. 1989 Res. 3-13A, “To Study and Clarify Services of Women in Congregational and Synodical Offices” (1989 Convention Pro- ceedings, 118).