# Lehre und Wehre_St. Louis Missouri_April 1856_S121 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 121 The Whole of the Lutheran Symbols, the Foundation, etc. "-berg then asked him publicly in the church before the congregation whether he would do this through God's grace and help, whereupon he not only answered yes, but also gave his hand upon it." (See: Volume XVIII, from the year 1754, Part 106, page 598. The report is taken from a work of the Augsburg senior Samuel Urlsperger, "God's American Husbandry," which work contains the diaries and correspondence of the American Lutheran preachers concerned.) In another place of the same work it reads as follows: "The dedication of the Philadelphia church, already mentioned by us, has been described in detail by Pastor Mühlenberg, and we note of it only this much further: that, as the cornerstones of this church were laid with the intention that the evangelical-Lutheran doctrine, according to the foundation of the prophets and apostles, according to the unaltered Augsburg Confession and all the other symbolical books of our church, should be taught therein — so too the church council at Philadelphia had, at the dedication, publicly and by word of mouth to promise that, with God's help, they would endeavor to maintain the same, for the aforesaid purpose, unto child and children's children." (Volume XVI, from the year 1758, page 936. 937.) Important also for the proof of our assertion is this: that the Lutheran Salzburgers who emigrated to Georgia in the year 1734 accepted the support for this from the King of England and from the English Society de promovenda cognitione Christi (for the advancement of the knowledge of Christ) only under the condition granted them: "That they should be protected in the free exercise of their religion according to the content of the Augsburg Confession and the other symbolical books of the evangelical church to which they professed themselves." (See Sam. Urlsperger's detailed report on the Salzburg emigrants, p. 4; compare Heinsius's impartial church history, part 3, p. 129.) Because the most influential of the first Lutheran preachers came forth from the school of A. H. Francke, some conclude a priori that these men, given their presumably purely practical bent, could hardly have been so strict as to demand of every Lutheran the confession of all the Symbols, and that therefore the original doctrinal basis of the American Lutheran church was surely a broader one than that of the church of Germany. As we have heard above, however, this presumption is entirely false. When Mühlenberg went to America, even in Germany the orthodox had great misgivings as to whether this man recommended by Francke was the right one to win, amid the unparalleled discord in doctrine that already characterized America at that time, a firm foundation on which to build the pure Lutheran church. In the second continuation of the church history of Heinsins it therefore says, among other things: