# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_2004_S237 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) HIGHER EDUCATION 237 5-42 To Require Doctrinal Subscription for All Faculty Members of Synodical Institutions WHEREAS, Bylaw 6.23 (Appointment of Members to Faculties of Synodical Institutions) was altered by the 1998 Synod conven- tion; and WHEREAS, This action changed the former wording of paragraph e: “When, in exceptional cases, laypersons are involved, they should be persons who are solemnly pledged to the Holy Scriptures as the inspired Word of God and to the Lutheran Confessions” to read in paragraph c: “When laypersons are employed in full-time teaching positions, they shall pledge to perform their duties in har- mony with the Holy Scriptures as the inspired Word of God, the Lutheran Confessions, the Synod’s doctrinal statements, and the policies of the Synod”; and WuereAas, The phrase “and the policies of the Synod” is impre- cise and ambiguous since there is no central compilation of “the policies of the Synod” to which laypersons/teachers are asked to pledge their agreement; and WHEREAS, Not even rostered members of the Synod are asked to make such a pledge; therefore be it Resolved, That the 2003 convention of the Northern Illinois District petition the 2004 LCMS convention to require all mem- bers of the faculties of synodical institutions to pledge themselves to perform their duties in harmony with the Holy Scriptures as the inspired Word of God, the Lutheran Confessions, and the Synod’s doctrinal statements alone, by removing “and the policies of the Synod” from Bylaw 6.23 c. Northern Illinois District; Trinity, Roselle, IL; Circuit 6, Northern Illinois District 5-43 To Investigate Teaching of Evolution in Synod’s Colleges Whereas, The Scriptures clearly teach that God created all that exists by His almighty Word, in the span of six days, and that He is, therefore, the author and giver of all life; and WHEREAS, This teaching has been the official position of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (Brief Statement of the Doctri- nal Position of the Missouri Synod, paragraph 5); and WHEREAS, Deviation from this teaching calls into question the au- thority of Scripture as well as denigrates the value of human life; and WHEREAS, There are indications that the theory of evolution has been taught as fact in some Synod colleges; therefore be it Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod reaffirm its confidence in the doctrine of creation; and be it further Resolved, That the Board for Higher Education begin an imme- diate investigation into the teaching of evolution in our Synod’s colleges with the mandate to bring all science curricula into agree- ment with our official position on the doctrine of creation. Montana District; Our Redeemer, Columbia Falls, MT 5-44 To Survey Teaching of Creationism in Concordia University System WHEREAS, The Bible teaches that God created the heavens and the earth in six days; and WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod upholds the teaching of creationism; and WuereAS, The false teaching of evolution undermines the truth of Holy Scriptures and has led many to doubt their faith since Gen- esis 1 and 2 are foundational to the whole of Scripture; and WHEREAS, There are reports that creationism is not being taught at some of our Concordias; and Whereas, Our future church workers as well as others attending our colleges and universities need familiarity with the solid argu- ments of creationism to address the very fundamental question of origins that resonates in our secular culture; therefore be it Resolved, That a survey of all science instructors and profes- sors at each of our Concordia colleges and universities be compiled under the direction of the Board for Higher Education to determine the extent of their teaching of creationism; and be it further Resolved, That the results of this survey be shared with the var- ious boards of regents of the colleges and universities for any cor- rective actions necessary; and be it finally Resolved, That a summary of the findings of this study be piib- lished in Reporter. Circuit 13 Forum, North Wisconsin District; Faith, Plano, TX; Immanuel, Brandon, FL; St. Paul, Bonduel, WI 5-45 To Require Teaching of Doctrine of Creation in Synod Schools WHEREAS, The Scriptures teach that God is the creator of all that exists and, therefore, the author and giver of life, which Scriptural teaching is undermined by the theory of evolution; and WHEREAS, The Scriptures teach that men will “deliberately for- get” that God is the creator of all (2 Peter 3:5—6); therefore be it Resolved, That the Montana District in convention request the Synod in the 2004 convention to direct the Board for Higher Edu- cation to require the professors and teachers at its institutions of higher education to teach creation doctrine; and be it further Resolved, That the Secretary of the District submit a copy of ‘this resolution as an overture to the 2004 Synod convention. Montana District 5-46 To Clarify Role of “‘Teachers of Theology” at Synod Colleges and Seminaries WHEREAS, St. Paul expressly confines the teaching of doctrine to qualified men (1 Tim. 2:12; 3:1-2; 1 Cor. 14:34; Titus 1:5-9; 2:1); and WHEREAS, The Augsburg Confession maintains that “nobody should publicly teach or preach or administer the sacraments in the church without a regular call” (AC XIV); and WHEREAS, The colleges and seminaries of the Synod exist “for preparation of professional church workers and other Christian leaders” (Bylaw 6.34 b); and WuerEaS, The Commission on Theology and Church Relations has recognized that the term “teacher of theology” is sometimes “used in the sense of providing ‘instruction’ or ‘explanation’ anal- ogous to the instruction that takes place in theology departments” in secular universities (Response to Questions from the BHE-CUS on Lay Teachers of Theology, Feb. 19, 2003); and WHEREAS, The Commission on Theology and Church Relations has found that in other cases “teacher of theology” describes a po- sition that would “necessarily involve the proclamation and trans- mission of the church’s authoritative ‘public teaching’ (publica doctrina)” and in such cases “only one who has been properly called (rite vocatus) into the office of the public ministry may serve in this position” (Response to Questions from the BHE-CUS on Lay Teachers of Theology, Feb. 19, 2003); therefore be it Resolved, That the Synod acknowledge that “teachers of theol- ogy” in its colleges and seminaries, because they are responsible “for preparation of professional church workers and other Christian leaders,” will necessarily be involved in “the proclamation and transmission of the church’s authoritative ‘public teaching’ ”; and be it further