# Lehre und Wehre_St. Louis Missouri_April 1856_S100 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 100 The Obligation to the Church's Confessions, etc. labor, may be recognized by everyone. In this form of it, too, it henceforth belongs to the believed Word of God. With a certain disfavor, theologians of the most recent time have regarded the formation of dogmas in the Christian Church, as though faith thereby lost its original freshness and vitality. But the ground and cause of this supposed loss can only be human weakness, in which we gladly misuse our possession of doctrine in order to conceal, under it, the unbelief of our hearts. The believed Word of God becomes dogma according to that same divine order which, for instance, has also ordained that men should not remain in the patriarchal mode of life, however rich it may always be in the loveliest virtues. The believed Word, which Christians have inherited from the fathers, they must themselves acquire in order to possess it; for one can indeed have it, know it by heart, hold it to be true, and speak of it, without possessing it. To possess it means to believe it; to acquire it means to be converted to belief in it, and that does not happen without reflection upon it, without effort to grasp it clearly and comprehensively, without struggle. Out of these movements, which are natural to the believing spirit, Christian theology arises, as has already been shown above; but since the striving after contemplation and comprehensive view of the believed Word belongs not only to the spirit of those Christians gifted for theological labor, but to the believing congregation as such, the results of theology — whatever it attains in the way of theological concepts, indeed even preliminary work toward such concepts — pass, little by little, into the knowledge of faith of the whole congregation. The order in which the individual parts of the believed Word thus become dogmas is arranged by God Himself, especially through the struggles into which He leads His Church. False doctrine from without, and the resulting inner assault within the congregation itself, drives it to reflect upon the corresponding part of the believed Word — to theological labor, that is, on the part of those gifted for it, and to the testing and acceptance of the fruits of that labor on the part of the whole congregation; the more the false doctrine entrenches itself and even takes on the shape of dogma, the more precisely and definitely the Church's dogma takes shape in turn; the moment of decision in the struggle thus kindled arrives, and then the Church sets up, as its dogma, the concept of the disputed doctrine — a concept that has matured in the hands of theology and proven itself by the written Word of God — and thereby rejects the false doctrine fully and finally. Little by little, thereafter, the dogma, in its new, definite formulation, enters also into the knowledge of faith of the individual congregations and members of the congregation; whole generations, indeed, may pass over it, scholarship may complete it, grasp it more sharply, ground it more deeply, but it is no longer set aside. Other struggles, meanwhile, arise; concerning other doctrinal points differing opinions become vocal, so that the Church, and within it theology in particular, directs itself to that, a new structure of doctrine begins, false opinions