# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_2004_S56 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 56 REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT It is important to recall the words of Francis Pieper, fourth President of the LCMS: Christian congregations, and their public servants, are only the administrants and not lords of the Sacrament....On the one hand, they are not permitted to introduce ‘Open Communion’; on the other hand, they must guard against denying the Sacrament to those Christians for whom Christ has appointed it. (Christian Dogmatics, III, p. 381) Church and Ministry The authority of the pastoral office and the priesthood of all believers have been key elements of doctrine and practice of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod since its formation in 1847. Theses presented by C. F. W. Walther at the famous debates held in Altenburg, Missouri, in 1841, were adopted, somewhat modified, at the Synod’s 1851 convention, affirming the distinction between the office of the pastor and the priesthood of all believers, including the following: • The holy ministry, or the pastoral office, is an office distinct from the priestly office, which belongs to all believers. • The ministry, or the pastoral office, is not a human ordinance, but an office established by God Himself. • The ministry of preaching is not an arbitrary office, but its character is such that the church has been commanded to establish it and is ordinarily bound to it till the end of days. • The ministry of preaching is not a peculiar order, set up over and against the common estate of Christians, and holier than the latter, like the priesthood of the Levites, but it is an office of service. • Reverence and unconditional obedience are due to the ministry of preaching when the preacher is ministering the Word of God. However, the preacher may not dominate over the church; he has, accordingly, no right to make new laws, to arrange indifferent matters and ceremonies arbitrarily, and to impose and execute excommunication alone, without a previous verdict of the entire congregation. • According to divine right the function of passing judgment on doctrine belongs to the ministry of preaching. However, also the laymen have this right, and for this reason they also have a seat and vote with the preacher in church courts and councils. • The ministry of preaching is conferred by God through the congregation as holder of all church power, or of the keys, and by its call, as prescribed by God. The ordination of those called, with the laying on of hands, is not by divine institution but is an apostolic church ordinance and merely a public, solemn confirmation of the call. Clear as these affirmations might appear, disagreement nevertheless exists within our Synod regarding their application. In more than a few instances, there simply is lack of clarity and concurrence regarding the role, responsibility, authority, and accountability of both the office of pastor and the role of laity in the church. The position of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod on the doctrine of church and ministry is succinctly sum2004 Convention Proceedings marized in a presentation entitled “The LCMS on the Lay Performance of Pastoral Functions” by Dr. Samuel Nafzger, Executive Director of the CTCR, in the following three points: 1. God gives the Office of the Keys or all church power immediately and originally to all Christians (i.e., the church). 2. The pastoral office has been instituted by God for the sake of good order in the church for the public (i.e., in behalf of and with accountability to the church) preaching of the Gospel and for the public administration of the Sacraments. 3. Since the Office of the Keys has been given by Christ “immediately” and “originally” to all Christians, lay people may be asked in cases of necessity and emergency situations to perform pastoral functions. But this should be done only in the prolonged absence of a rightly called pastor, lest there be a “weakening of the pastoral ministry with all its benefits.” May our gracious God bless both the pastoral office and the priesthood of all believers! Traditional and Contemporary Worship In the past few decades, numerous congregations of the LCMS have introduced “contemporary” worship forms and music in addition to and, in some instances, even in place of traditional liturgies and hymnody. The conditions of membership in the Synod require “Exclusive use of doctrinally pure agenda, hymnbooks, and catechisms in church and school” (LCMS Constitution, Art. VI). This presents a dilemma, since our Synod has not specifically stipulated what these “doctrinally pure” contemporary worship resources for use by our congregations and professional church workers must be. The specific wording of our Constitution in this regard is: The Synod, under Scripture and the Lutheran Confessions, shall— Encourage congregations to strive for uniformity in church practice, but also to develop an appreciation of a variety of responsible practices and customs which are in harmony with our common profession of faith. (LCMS Constitution, Art. III 7) The result is that congregations search for and, in some cases, implement, worship resources that do not always measure up to our common understanding of being “doctrinally pure.” At the same time, some traditional worship resources, while considered “doctrinally pure,” are perceived by some as being “rote” or “routine,” depriving some worshipers of a variety in worship they sincerely desire and appreciate. Many who read these words can perhaps identify with my own experience, which includes attendance at “contemporary” worship services that contain all the necessary ingredients of a truly Lutheran service, and some other services that miss the mark in that regard. At the same time, some “traditional” worship services miss a different mark in that while “doctrinally pure,” they fail to communicate Law and Gospel in understandable, meaningful ways to worshipers whose concerns and burdens in life are quite different from those of our forefathers. Whether traditional or contemporary, worship services in congregations of the LCMS must employ doctrinally pure resources for the basic elements of distinctively Lutheran Christian worship. Although neither the Order of Matins nor the Order of Vespers (two of my favorites) in The Lutheran Hymnal includes a standard invocation, confession, absolution, or creed, those elements of worship, along