# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_2001_S243 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) STRUCTURE, PLANNING, AND ADMINISTRATION 243 7-16 To Not Use Policy-Based Management Principles and Practices WHEREAS, Secular organizations by their very nature do not take into account the vertical (divine) dimension of the origin and pur- pose of the world and of their own members and activities (e.g., businesses, unions, social groups, government); and WHEREAS, Many of these secular organizations have adopted practices of management that are naturally based on man-made policies and have found such systems to be useful on the horizontal (human) level; and WHEREAS, “Policy-based management” principles are a recent form of such horizontal thinking and include the concept that poli- cies can be modified by a board without the prior knowledge or ap- proval of the stockholders and stakeholders (as long as the mone- tary or other value of the secular organization rises or is properly protected); and WHEREAS, “Policy-based management” principles also include the concept that executives and staff personnel are free to do as they see fit as long as their governing boards have not declared a specific action to be outside of board policy (i.e., executives and staff do not have to receive approval for any action unless their boards have previously declared such action not to be allowed); and WHEREAS, “Policy-based management” methods as used in the Lord’s service in the church often mean that the executives, staff members, and even boards of the Synod are free to take actions (many of which result in the establishment of policies that can em- barrass their boards later on) without the possibility that the mem- bers of the synodical boards would have opportunity to examine whether the vertical dimension (i.e., God’s Word and the Lutheran Confessions) is controlling such human-level policies and actions; and WHEREAS, Some of the boards and entities of our Synod have already adopted the principles of “policy-based management,” and the elected boards have at times found 1t awkward or even impos- sible to reverse certain actions taken by their respective executives or staffs because it is impossible to create proper policies for every situation ahead of time; and WHEREAS, Some of these actions have at times tended to weaken the biblical and Lutheran doctrine and practice of certain segments of the Synod (e.g., the introduction of open Communion, humanism in worship forms, the participation of women in pastoral actions and leadership, the acceptance of lodge members without explaining how the lodges contradict Christ and the Scriptures, ac- ceptance of new members without adequate instruction in Christian doctrine, secular methods of pastoral leadership); and WHEREAS, In addition to the above, the contemplated relegation of much of the Handbook of our Synod to the category of mere pol- icy (which could easily be changed) has been suggested, thereby making it much more difficult for the Synod and its responsible elected leaders to oversee the doctrine and practice of its members; and WuerEAaS, Decision making and action taking among brothers and sisters in Christ are to be done in Christian love and after reaching mutual understanding in “the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace” (Eph. 4:1-6; | Cor. 1:10; Phil. 4:2—3; etc.); therefore be it Resolved, That the Synod in convention recognize that “policy- based management” principles, although quite valid and useful for secular organizations, are not useful or adaptable to the service of the Lord in the operation of His church; and be it further Resolved, That the Synod require that its officers, boards, Dis- tricts, and other entities, along with their respective executives and staffs, no longer utilize the principles of “policy-based manage- ment”; and be it finally Resolved, That the Synod direct its Commission on Structure and its Commission on Constitutional Matters to follow the above resolutions in carrying out their assigned tasks. Shepherd by the Lakes Syracuse, IN 7-17 To Reject Governance by Policy and Overall Changes to Handbook WHEREAS, The 1998 Handbook of The Lutheran Church—Mis- souri Synod contains the Constitution, the Bylaws, and the Articles of Incorporation of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod; and WHEREAS, The aforesaid documents overall have served the Synod well and are capable of being understood by the average pastor and layperson; and WHEREAS, Where questions have arisen over construction and/or application, a “body of law” has developed through rulings of the Commission on Constitutional Matters; and WHEREAS, The Commission on Structure of the Synod in July 2000 released volumes [ and II of its Preliminary Report and Pro- posed Handbook, and WHEREAS, The aforesaid Preliminary Report proposes many and major changes to the Synod’s Bylaws, a considerable number of which changes characterize as “policy” what are now Bylaws; and WHEREAS, Management by policy is very susceptible to ever- and quick-changing authority, with reduced or little control by the Synod through its elected boards and commissions and ultimately by the congregations of the Synod that act legislatively in conven- tions of the Synod assembled triennially; therefore be it Resolved, That the 2001 convention of the Synod abandon any shift to governance by “policy,” avoid any major “recodification” or “recasting” of the 1998 Handbook of the Synod, and make only those changes therein as result from adoption of typical convention resolutions that are distinct and separate from a structural change or a “recodification” or “recasting” of the Bylaws. Concordia Theological Seminary Fort Wayne, IN 7-18 To Reject Proposed Handbook of Commission on Structure WHEREAS, The Formula of Concord (Ep X 4) provides for con- gregational autonomy in matters of adiaphora; and WHEREAS, Freedom in matters of adiaphora enables a congre- gation to adapt its mission and ministry to meet the unique needs of its locale; and WHEREAS, The changes proposed by the July 2000 Proposed Handbook prepared by the Commission on Structure severely limit congregational autonomy; and WHEREAS, Art. VII of the Constitution provides that the Synod is not an ecclesiastical government exercising legislative or coer- cive powers, and with respect to the individual congregation’s right of self-government, the Synod is but an advisory body; therefore be it Resolved, That the 2001 convention of the Synod uphold con- gregational autonomy as set forth in Art. VII of the Constitution of the Synod so that matters of adiaphora continue to be determined by the needs of the local congregation; and be it further Resolved, That the 2001 convention of the Synod reject the July 2000 Proposed Handbook prepared by the Commission on Struc- ture; and be it finally Resolved, That we exhibit the love Jesus commanded of His dis- ciples in John 13:34-35 as we work together to find God-pleasing solutions to matters of concern among members of the Synod. Messiah Parker, AZ 2001 Convention Workbook