# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_2001_S164 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 164 THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS 3-26 To Reaffirm and Implement Consistent Practice of Close Communion WHEREAS, The Scriptures require both a knowledge of the Lord’s Supper sufficient for its proper reception and a contrite heart that trusts Jesus’ Word (1 Cor. 11:27-29); and WHEREAS, Fellowship at the Lord’s Table is an act of confes- sion of faith (1 Cor. 10:17); and WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, in conven- tion (1995 Res. 3-08) addressed the document “A Declaration of Eucharistic Understanding and Practice” by adopting and reaffirm- ing Res. 2-19 (1967), which thereby places the entire Synod offi- cially opposed to “A Declaration of Eucharistic, Understanding and Practice”; and WuereEaS, The admission to Holy Communion without a regard for confession of faith is neither faithful to God’s Word nor an act of love (Rom. 16:17); and WHEREAS, The practice of close Communion was officially and publicly taught and observed by the early church; and WuereEas, The practice of close Communion is affirmed by our Lutheran Confessions: “For we do not intend to admit to the sacra- ment and administer it to those who do not know what they seek or why they come” (447:2; 575:32f, etc. Tappert); and WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod from its be- ginning in 1847 practiced close Communion (see the explanation of the Smal] Catechism, 1991, question 305); and WHEREAS, The practice of close Communion seeks to prevent both harmful reception of the Sacrament as well as a profession of unity in confession of faith where this unity does not exist (1 Cor. 11:27-29; 1:10); and WHEREAS, Disparity in the practice of the Lord’s Supper has created confusion and controversy in the Synod; and WHEREAS, It is desirable that uniform practice in harmony with the theology of the Lord’s Supper be followed in the Synod; and WHEREAS, The Commission on Theology and Church Rela- tions’ 1983 report “Theology and Practice of the Lord’s Supper” reaffirmed the biblical practice of close Communion believed, taught, and confessed by the orthodox Lutheran Church for cen- turies; and WHEREAS, Some liberal districts are adopting resolutions at their conventions that are “Open Communion Policy,” which is both contrary to the Word of God and contrary to the Lutheran Confes- sions; therefore be it Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in its 2001 synodical convention reaffirm its position on fellowship and practice of close(d) Communion; and be it further Resolved, That the implementation of the consistent practice shall be a top priority of the District Presidents, who are responsible for supervision of doctrine and practice of pastors and congrega- tions in their Districts; and be it finally Resolved, That the District Presidents report annually to the syn- odical President on their progress in the implementation of the above, and that the synodical President prepare a summary by Dis- trict at the synodical convention. Salem Taylorsville, NC 3-27 To Reaffirm Our Time-Honored Practice of Close Communion WHEREAS, We affirm the biblical and confessional close Com- munion position the LCMS has followed through the years; and Wuereas, Reflecting the Scriptures, Luther states in the Small Catechism regarding preparation for the Sacrament: “Fasting and bodily preparation are certainly fine outward training. But that per- 2001 Convention Workbook son is truly worthy and well prepared who has faith in these words: ‘Given and shed for you for the forgiveness of sins.’ But anyone who does not believe these words or doubts them is unworthy and unprepared, for the words “for you” require all hearts to believe”; and WHEREAS, The Sacrament is the gift to the entire community of faith; and WHEREAS, We would seek to discourage the extremes that allow no room for pastoral discretion in special circumstances; and WHEREAS, This overture was viewed of sufficient merit to be passed as Res. 1-02 at the convention of the Northern Illinois Dis- trict, June 1997; therefore be it Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod reaffirm our time-honored practice of close Communion. St. John Mount Prospect, IL 3-28 To Reaffirm and Clarify Policy on Fellowship and Close(d) Communion WHEREAS, Reports of worship fellowship with those who are not in doctrinal agreement with The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod continue to trouble the church; and Wuereas, The close(d) Communion practice of the Synod has been under attack in some quarters; and Wuereas, The Synod in its Constitution, Art. IIT 1, recognizes the mandate of St. Paul to mark those who cause divisions and of- fenses contrary to the doctrine which we have learned and avoid them (Rom. 16:17); and WHEREAS, The Communion statement in the worship bulletin has become the standard means of informing guests of the scrip- tural mandate of fellowship and close(d) Communion: therefore be it Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in con- vention assembled reaffirm its position on fellowship and close(d) Communion; and be it further Resolved, That we understand this to mean that our pastors are not to participate publicly as worship leaders with those with whom the Synod is not in doctrinal fellowship; and be it finally Resolved, That those who are not members of the LCMS or of a church body with which the Synod is in full doctrinal fellowship are not to be communed except in very exceptional circumstances. Exceptional circumstances do not include Sunday worship. Zion Kearney, NE 3-29 To Reaffirm 1986 Synodical Convention Action re Admission to Holy Communion WuereEAS, One of the blessings of the Lord’s Supper is to be a Sacrament of unity (1 Cor. 10:17): and WHEREAS, There continues to be a need for discussion of the policies of admission to the Lord’s Supper in LCMS congregations while upholding the historic practice of close Communion, and WHEREAS, Due to its clear statement on historic close Commu- nion and its clear understanding of the need for pastoral discern- ment in the administration of the Sacrament of the Altar locally. the best recent convention resolution explanation of the practice of close Communion occurred in 1986; and Wurere_as, Recent additions, accretions, and documents have only served to overdefine and overmanage the administration of the Sacrament to the point of confusion and division among us, therefore be it