# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_1998_S160 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 160 THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS WHEREAS, Admitting people to the Lord’s Table without a proper regard for this common confession of faith is neither faithful to God’s Word nor the Lutheran Confessions, nor is it an act of love (1 Cor. 11:27-30; AC X; XXII; XXIV; H. P. Hamann, Studies in Holy Communion (LCA, S.A. District: Church Development Committee, 1977), pp. 11-14); and WHEREAS, The practice of close(d) Communion has been the practice of the Christian church since the days of the apostles (Werner Elert, Eucharist and Church Fellowship in the First Four Centuries {St. Louis: CPH, 1966]; N. Nagel, “Closed Communion: In the Way of the Gospel; In the Way of the Law,” Concordia Journal, vol. 17, no. 1 [January 1991], pp. 20-29); and Wuereas, The practice of close(d) Communion was the prac- tice of Lutheranism since its inception (Martin Wittenberg, “Church Fellowship and Altar Fellowship in the Light of Church History,” Logia, vol. 1, no. 1 (October 1992), pp. 23-57; Martin Luther, “An Open Letter to Those in Frankfort on the Main, 1533,” trans. J. D. Veiker, Concordia Journal, vol. 16, no. 4 ({October 1990}, pp. 333-51); and WHEREAS, The practice of close(d) Communion is the historic practice of the LCMS (C. F. W. Walther Theses on Communion Fellowship with Those Who Believe Differently [Fort Wayne, Ind.: Concordia Theological Seminary Press, 1990]); and WHEREAS, The practice of close(d) Communion seeks to pre- vent a harmful reception of the Sacrament as well as a false pro- fession of unity where it does not exist; and WHEREAS, There is no longer the same uniformity in the prac- tice of Communion fellowship in the LCMS as there had been in past years; and WHEREAS, It is desirable that uniform practice in harmony with Scripture and the Lutheran Confessions be followed in the Synod; and WHEREAS, Recent actions taken by the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) approved of intercommunion with the Reformed, who deny the doctrine of the Real Presence, there is the necessity for the LCMS to give a strong biblical witness for the his- toric practice of close(d) Communion; and WHEREAS, The practice of close(d) Communion also allows for pastors to give “responsible pastoral care ... including Holy Com- munion” to those not in pulpit and altar fellowship with the LCMS (1981 Res. 3-01); therefore be it Resolved, That the pastors and congregations of the LCMS con- tinue to abide by the historic practice of close(d) Communion, which includes the exercising of responsible pastoral care in extra- ordinary circumstances; and be it further Resolved, That pastors and congregations continue to study what the Scriptures and the Confessions teach on this matter in order that greater uniformity in practice would be exercised in the Synod. St. Paul Waseca, MN 3-21 To Reject Position of Florida-Georgia District on Open Communion WHEREAS, In regular convention in 1997, the Florida-Georgia District of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod took a position of advocating open Communion; and WHEREAS, This action is in direct opposition to the historical position of our Synod and goes against many synodical resolutions down through the years; and WHEREAS, The synodical practice of close(d) Communion is based solidly upon God’s Holy Word as well as on many clear pas- sages in the Lutheran Confessions; therefore be it Resolved, That the Florida-Georgia District President, in con- junction with the synodical President, is hereby directed to frater- nally instruct and, where needed, admonish synodical members of the District regarding our Synod’s position on open and close(d) Communion; and be it further Resolved, That synodical members of the District who refuse this instruction and admonition and continue to speak and act in contrary ways be deemed to be persisting in an offensive conduct and be expelled by their District President in accordance with the Constitution and Bylaws of Synod; and be it finally Resolved, That if the Florida-Georgia District President refuses to carry out these duties, then the synodical Praesidium be given charge to do so in his place. . St. Paul Lockport, IL 3-22 To Address Florida-Georgia District Concerning Their Communion Practice WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church-—Missouri Synod meeting in convention in 1967 passed a resolution, and in subsequent conven- tions reaffirmed “that pastors and congregations of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, except in situations of emergency and in special cases of pastoral care, commune individuals of only those synods which are now in fellowship with us”; and WHEREAS, The Florida-Georgia District, in convention on May 19-21 in Leesburg, Fla., resolved that the District “affirm the right of its pastors and congregations to admit to the Lord’s Table those who, regardless of denominational affiliation, share our confession of Christ and our conviction of what He freely offers in the Eu- charist’’; and WHEREAS, Such a resolution is disheartening to our Synod for the following reasons: It violates Rom. 16:17, where St. Paul says, “I urge you, broth- ers, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have learned. Keep away from them”; It is an act of unionism, accepting any and all denominations to come to the Lord’s Supper, thus denying unity in doctrine and prac- tice; It violates the purpose and spirit of “Close Communion”; It gives offense to other Christians in the LCMS, as 1 Cor. 8:12 says, “When you sin against your brothers in this way and wound their weak conscience, you sin against Christ”; It violates our synodical Constitution and Bylaws; and WHEREAS, “Situations of emergency,” especially in this case, has become the rule rather than the exception with regard to com- muning those not of our confession of faith; therefore be it Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in Christian love point out the seriousness of this offense; and be it further Resolved, That the Florida-Georgia District and its congrega- tions return to the biblical and historic practice of “Close Commu- nion,” thus abolishing and abandoning its “Open Communion” pol- icy; and be it finally Resolved, That this happen in a God-pleasing manner as we seek to “walk together,” obeying our Lord Jesus Christ and His Word, as He Himself promises us: “If you hold to My teaching, you are really My disciples” (John 8:31). Circuit 16 Forum South Wisconsin District 3-23 To Restore Constant Communion Practice WHEREAS, The Florida-Georgia District in convention passed a resolution (2.97:04) allowing its congregations to “welcome to the Lord's Table those who, regardless of denominational affiliation,