# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_1998_S30 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 30 , SYNODICAL REPORTS 3. A typical feature of many children’s sermons/messages is the object lesson. The commission wishes to offer a caution con- cerning this approach because of its failure to recognize the au- dience. Considerable research related to child development has demonstrated that children younger than 10 or 11 do not readily think in the abstract. This, however, is the primary requirement of an object lesson, which demands abstract thought to make the point of comparison. The result is that children can leave the service remembering the object but failing to grasp the point that was intended. a. Illustrations that are found in the Scriptures (e.g., Jesus as the Good Shepherd or the Light of the world) are certainly of value in teaching the children. Though the younger ones may not fully grasp the point, upon repeated hearing of these bib- lical texts, they will, over a number of years, grow into a deeper understanding. b. The interest that adults show in the object lesson during a children’s sermon/message suggests that perhaps many of them are missing this type of illustration in the regular preaching. As pastors prepare sermons, it is important that they work hard at incorporating appropriate illustrations to elucidate their message. 4. The medium that is best suited to children is that of telling the story. Given the fact that Scripture is filled with the stories of our salvation, it should be obvious that this is the way to speak to children about the faith. We should never assume that chil- dren already know the biblical stories or that they are bored with them. Rather, the church should strive to tell these stories again and again, remembering that these things were written for our instruction (] Cor. 10:11; Rom. 15:4). Pastors who are going to “tell the story” to children should realize that this will require careful preparation. If no thought is given until just before the service, the story will either fall flat or else the pastor will have to resort to theatrics to keep the children’s interest. 5. When a children’s sermon/message is to be included in a ser- vice, the commission recommends that it be viewed not as an add-on or interruption, but rather that it be designed to flow from the liturgy. a. The Old and New Testament stories that are included in the lectionary are an obvious place to begin in choosing the sub- ject matter for a children’s sermon/message. On those occa- sions where the lectionary does not provide an appropriate story to retell to the children, another biblical story related to the theme of the day may be appropriate. b. In addition to biblical stories, the children’s sermon/message can serve as an explanation to some aspect of the liturgy. In this case, it is an opportunity to tell another “story,” namely, what we do in our worship and why we do it. Another ap- proach would be to focus on a portion of the Catechism (per- haps again on a topic related to the theme of the day). 6. Regarding the logistical question of the placement of the chil- dren, it is most in keeping with the “flow” of the liturgy for the children to be facing the same direction as the congregation with the pastor facing the entire assembly. This arrangement will re- inforce the understanding that the message is not focusing on the children but on God and that it is a time of proclamation. 7. While there are various practices as to who delivers the chil- dren’s sermon/message, the fact that the message is the procla- mation of the Word of God implies that it is the pastor who should deliver the message. Exceptions to this practice would fall under the same guidelines as situations where a pastor is not available. It is taught among us that nobody should publicly teach or preach or administer the sacraments in the church without a regular call. (AC 14) The following are several practical suggestions based on the preceding guidelines: 1. When the children’s sermon/message is a story based on the Gospel or Old Testament reading, consider inviting the children forward to hear the reading, perhaps with the pastor standing at the center of the chancel. This would help to reinforce the understanding that the children should pay close attention whenever the Word of God is read. 2. If the message is based on the Gospel, the children should stand for the reading (like the rest of the congregation) and then sit down to hear the pastor tell the story. Following the message, the children should stand with the congregation to confess the Creed before returning to their seats. (The children should be taught the Creed at home and in Sunday School and/or the Lutheran Day School so that they can participate in this part of the service.) Appendix R2-02B Reflections on Contemporary/Alternative Worship Introduction In Revelation 5 the apostle John records a wondrous vision of heaven in which the whole heavenly host is gathered around the throne of the triune God. In joyous song they proclaim the work of salvation accomplished by the Lamb of God—our Lord Jesus Christ—and raise their voices in thanksgiving to Him who has made them to be a “kingdom of priests” to serve their God (Rev. 5:10). Although we do not directly experience the splendor of St. John’s vision, the worship of God’s people in every age is no less profound. Where the Word of God is purely proclaimed and the Sacraments faithfully administered according to Christ’s command, there God is surely present to save. In worship we are in the throne room of the triune God to receive His gifts and respond to His grace. Our voices are joined to that heavenly host as we acknowl- edge our Savior and Lord: “To Him who sits on the throne and to the Lamb be praise and honor and glory and power, for ever and ever!” (Rev. 5:13). In recent years a significant debate has emerged in our Synod concerning our way of worship. Partly out of a desire to communi- cate the Gospel more effectively both to members and to the unchurched, a number of congregations have altered the orders of service provided in our hymnals. For some this foray into what is commonly called “contemporary worship” entails substituting new materials for various parts of the liturgy. For others the services go well beyond altering existing worship patterns; rather, they have chosen to design services that clearly depart from the historic pat- tern of worship that has been handed down to succeeding genera- tions of Christians for nearly 2,000 years. A topic as crucial as worship demands careful thought and re- flection, for the church’s worship is the place where God Himself distributes His life-giving Word and Sacraments. Certainly the church has a great responsibility to act faithfully in its worship as God’s gifts of forgiveness, life, and salvation are bestowed on His people. The following reflections are not intended to be an exhaustive response to the debate on contemporary/alternative worship. Whether a congregation is presently using a “contemporary” ser- vice, is considering adding such a service, or has no intention of moving in this direction, it is the commission’s hope that the fol- lowing comments will draw the Synod into a serious study of the significance of these matters. Worship and Liturgy: Some Definitions By definition Christianity is salvation-centered. That is the clear biblical witness, that God in Christ came to save sinners (1 Tim. 1:15), Certainly the church’s worship can be characterized in the same way. It, too, is salvation-centered as the people of God gather to hear the Word of life and to eat and drink the holy meal of Christ’s body and blood. Hence, worship could be described as a lively interchange between the God who saves and sinners in need of salvation. Without God’s gracious intervention, however, we would be in- capable either of receiving His good gifts or of uttering any praise of His goodness and mercy. As the psalmist succinctly puts it: “O Lord, open my lips, and my mouth will declare Your praise” (Ps. 51:15). Any definition of worship, therefore, must go beyond the one-sided perspective that defines it essentially as something we do, as an act of “reverence offered a divine being or supernatural