# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1973_S181 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) RESOLUTIONS 181 Wuereas, The need and opportunity for Lutheran lay higher education still exist; therefore be it Resolved, That the Synod encourage this commission to carry out more actively its duties as stated in the Synod’s Handbook 6.183. Action: None. Referred under omnibus Res. 4-47 to the Board of Directors. To Restudy Cooperative Seminary Training Arrangement with Lutheran Theological Seminary, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan RESOLUTION 6-17 Overtures 6-55, 6-56, 6-57, 6-58 (CW, pp. 280—281) Wuereas, The Milwaukee convention of the LCMS (Res. 6-20, Proceedings, p.176) authorized establish- ment of an LCMS theological chair on the faculty of Lutheran Theological Seminary, Saskatoon, Canada; and Wuereas, The aforementioned resolution failed to give specific approval to the program of ministerial training that had been proposed, thus taking incomplete action (cf. Workbook, 1971, p. 285); and Wuereas, To date no chair has been established on the basis of Resolution 6-20, interim arrangements only having been effected; and WuereEas, The Lutheran Seminary at Saskatoon is jointly owned and operated by The Lutheran Church in America — Canada Section and by the Evangelical Lu- theran Church in Canada; and Wuereas, The LCMS is not in fellowship with the LCA — Canada Section; and Wuereas, The mere establishment of a theological chair (one man on a theological faculty) gives no con- trol over the doctrine taught at the aforementioned sem- inary; and Wuereas, Many of the Canadian brethren in the LCMS have expressed grave concern over this arrange- ment; and Wuereas, This arrangement constitutes a dangerous precedent for the LCMS in terms of delegating away the theological training of its future ministers to others and thereby surrendering effective control; therefore be it Resolved, That the LCMS restudy Resolution 6-20 of the 1971 convention and the arrangement with the Lutheran Theological Seminary, Saskatoon, as well as alternative courses of action; and be it further Resolved, That this study be conducted by the presi- dent of the Synod, the presidents of the three Canadian Districts of the LCMS, three persons from the CTCR designated by its executive secretary, and by two per- sons designated by the chairman of the Board for Higher Education; and be it further Resolved, That the results of this study and the con- sideration of alternate possibilities for training Canadian theological students be presented to the 1975 convention of the LCMS; and be it further Resolved, That in the interim that chair of theology authorized by Resolution 6-20 at Milwaukee remain un- filled and that the Board for Higher Education be per- mitted to continue the present interim arrangement un- til the 1975 convention; and be it finally Resolved, That Overtures 6-55, 6-57 and 6-58 be re- spectfully declined. Action: None. Referred under omnibus Res. 4-47 to the Board of Directors. To Review Admission Requirements and Policies for Synodical Colleges and Seminaries RESOLUTION 6-18 Overture 6-60 (CW, p. 282) Wuereas, Admission policies are prepared by the faculties of the respective synodical colleges and sem- inaries (Handbook 6.61 a.) and approved by the local Boards of Control (Handbook 6.63 a); and Whereas, The Board for Higher Education is directed to review such admission policies (Handbook 6.05c, 6.63 c); therefore be it Resolved, That the Board for Higher Education reg- ularly review all admission policies to “determine whether they are consistent with the stated objectives of the Synod’s educational system and its institutions.” Action: None. Referred under omnibus Res. 4-47 to the Board of Directors. To Improve and Revise Synod’s Policy on Sabbatical Leaves RESOLUTION 6-19 Overtures 6-47, 6-48, 6-49 (CW, pp. 278—279) Wuereas, The Synod has recognized that “each fac- ulty shall pursue the improvement of teaching and learning and the evaluation of their effectiveness in every segment of the institution and its curriculum” (synodical Handbook, Bylaw 6.61 b); and Wuereas, The Synod has recognized a sabbatical leave as an opportunity for a faculty member “to pur- sue advanced studies in his special field of work or in any other acceptable program of experience or re- search” (synodical Handbook 6.71 a); and Wuereas, The rapid development of specialized knowledge necessitates a more frequent schedule of sabbatical leaves than presently exists so that our col- leges and seminaries remain abreast of current trends and bring new competence to their teaching staffs; therefore be it Resolved, That the Synod continue to encourage fac- ulty members to undertake projects that will improve