# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1973_S96 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) ADDRESS OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE ALC 97 different concerns and problems. We take for granted that many years will be required to arrive at common- ality on all concerns. We have found strength in the process, a richness in the variety our mergers have brought us. We worked through an era of thinking the church to be like strained soup, with ingredients invisible, with consistency, flavor, and color all the same. We have known seasons when our patience with each other ran short. Then we would find our consensus in the Gospel and discover the church to be better illustrated by the fruitcake. In the cake each ingredient maintains its unique identity while mak- ing a distinct contribution to the whole, and there is even room for a few nuts. We believe our church strong because of this hard work in coming together, in dying that we might live. These past few years of fellowship with Missouri have allayed our fears about a judgmental, domineering Missouri attitude. We have found each other at so many levels. Our joint labors in LCUSA have been produc- tive and rewarding. We have met with the men on your Commission on Fellowship and had open, frank dis- cussions around areas of continuing concern. We have been confident that, with all participants acknowledging each other’s seriousness in submitting to the authority of the Scriptures, we would find God-pleasing solutions to our relatively peripheral differences without threat- ening the fellowship enjoyed. We have not imagined it would prove necessary to put any time constraints on the Spirit in these matters. It is our hope that our churches may continue to affirm our consensus in the Gospel and Sacraments, and to get on with the churches’ tasks unimpeded. One final word. I have attended conventions in 10 of our ALC districts. The congregations of the ALC have, out of our diversity, found an exciting unity of spirit and mission. ALC esprit is high. We are coming off a period of churchwide restructuring with excite- ment at the prospect of an all-out effort for the mission of the church. Our faces are turned outward. We are looking for the ways to bear witness to the Lordship and love of Christ in a worried and uncertain world. We see a great season of evangelism before us, at home and abroad. We intend to busy ourselves with works of love, serving the causes of justice and mercy in the affairs of men. We hope and pray that we will be marching with The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod in this great calling. God grant it may be so! Dr. Davm Preus ADDRESS OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA Dr. Preus, I congratulate you upon your election to the presidency of the Synod. From holding a similar office I understand something of the heavy and signifi- cant responsibilities that you carry. I know how your conscience must weigh your influence on the decisions and work of the Synod and on the faith and life of people in your church body and even beyond. Be as- sured of my prayers that God will strengthen your faith in our Lord Jesus Christ and endow you abun- dantly with the gifts of His Spirit. Delegates to this 50th regular convention of The Lu- theran Church — Missouri Synod, it is a privilege and Dr. Robert Marshall, President of the Lutheran Church in America a joy to greet you as brothers and sisters in Christ. I am grateful for the invitation once again to visit the Synod’s convention. I have been grateful, too, that President Preus has twice brought fraternal greetings to conventions of the Lutheran Church in America. These exchanges of convention visits show that our two church bodies do have a degree of fellowship. What is the nature of our fellowship? The New Testament teaches us that the church is one body in Christ. I believe God wants that unity made manifest. Yet we who share the Christian faith have not found the way to show our God-given unity in Christ through organizational structures, nor even through agreement about altar and pulpit fellowship between our two church bodies. I do not know whether St. Paul would belabor us for our divisions the way he did the congregation in Corinth. There is a strong possibility he would say to our two church bodies what is recorded in First Co- rinthians 4:6 and tell us we are too “puffed up,” too proud, too self satisfied. Of course each of us has a good reason to maintain an identity. We struggle for our institutional strength as a means to an end. That end is a pure confession of faith and a true witness to the Gospel. At the same time the apostle’s teaching is enough to warn us that each one stands in danger of allowing the struggle to show more clearly than the faith, of mak- ing the differences in our witness more evident than our