# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1973_S83 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) THE CONVENTION ESSAY 83 The Mission Enterprise To understand the missionary concept practiced dur- ing the first several decades of synodical history, one must distinguish between the “innere” (inner) and “sussere” (foreign) mission concepts. The “innere” or inner mission concept included primarily the services to one’s own countrymen and community. In contrast, “Sussere” or “foreign” missions dealt with foreign tongues and other races, such as the Chippewa Indians. That neither the inner or foreign work was pursued as extensively as it might have been was chiefly due to the Synod’s limited resources of manpower and money. There was always a shortage of clergymen because of the steady stream of German immigrants. For example, between 1852 and 1854 over 500,000 arrived; between 1847 and 1874, it is estimated that 2,668,000 settled in America. The peak was reached in 1882 when within one year more than 250,000 settled in the mid and far west. This caused the Synod to set up an immigrant mission at the port of arrival in New York City (1869) and Baltimore, Md. (1872). In its strenuous efforts to assist the immigrants, the Synod even stationed a mis- sionary in Bremen, Germany, in 1882. From its beginning, the Synod operated with a de- centralized concept of mission outreach. The primary responsibility for missions lay with the congregations. Pastors and people were expected to bring the Gospel to newly established settlements. We might call this the “leap frog” mission method. The mother congrega- tion, observing new settlements in neighboring terri- tories, sometimes a hundred or more miles away, called an assistant pastor to make exploratory trips and to organize new congregations. When the new settlement became strong enough to support its own ministry and school, it called its own staff and assumed responsibility for additional settlements. It soon became apparent, however, that an organized plan and overall strategy were required. Thus, the Dis- tricts (1870s) and synodical (1878) mission boards were established in order to meet the constantly growing needs and to provide coordination in allocating available men and funds. The “Macedonian calls’ came from everywhere: Mobile, Houston, Memphis, Iowa City, Keokuk, San Francisco, and from many points in between, as well as from the huge Canadian west. Permit just one illustration. Towards the end of 1859 a pleading letter was received from California which stated in part: Dear sirs over yonder: There are many Lutheran people here, at least in name; but they see nothing here but united churches. Dear sirs, if the Word applies also to you: go into the world, preach, and baptize, you ought to send a man into California. Work, and have no doubts concerning his maintenance. Our God is rich enough .. . [Der Lutheraner, XVI (13 December 1859), p. 70, trans- lated in CHIQ, IV (April 1931), 25—26] J. M. Buehler soon was sent to San Francisco. To illustrate the limited financial resources available, we need only to look at the commissioning of John Hilgendorf of Omaha, Nebr. In 1872 he was asked to explore the Colorado Territory, 500 miles distant, and given a check of $50 for expenses. President Buenger wrote him: “This sum, of course, will not suffice, but a missionary knows how to help himself.” No personal sacrifices were too great, no distances impossible, no financial allowance too small. The workers were will- ing to dare and to give their all to Christ and His Gospel. Chippewa Indians The first “foreign” mission which enlisted the sup- port of the Synod centered on the Chippewa Indians in Michigan. Wilhelm Loehe had established this work in 1845, and 3 years later transferred the operation to the Synod (Missouri Synod Proceedings, 1848, p. 17 ff.). Beginning in Frankenmuth, Mich., the work was ex- tended into several additional stations and by 1857 to Crow Wing, Minn. The members of the Synod knew the concept of “mission to the whole man” well. Missionary and Mrs. F. A. Craemer among others practiced the concept in their little Indian mission school in the 1840s which at one time reached a peak enrollment of 30. Whenever the Indian youngsters returned from a visit to their homes, they were filthy beyond description, wearing tattered clothing. To Mrs. Craemer fell the lot of wash- ing and delousing them and teaching them some of the amenities of life. She knew she had won the hearts of her little charges when they started calling her “Mut- ter” (Mother). Two of these early missionaries gave their lives in the service of their Lord. Missionary J. F. Maier (November 1850) died at the age of 27 in a storm at sea, and the wife of Missionary E. G. H. Miessler died in childbirth at the age of 26 and is the only white person buried in the Indian cemetery in St. Louis, Mich. Foreign Missions The transition from Chippewa and home missions to foreign missions was gradual. With the decline of the German immigration in the 1880s, the Synod ini- tiated a Jewish mission in New York City in 1884, and Estonian and Latvian missions in 1889. That same year it also opened a new Indian mission in Wisconsin. Work among the deaf blossomed forth through the efforts of Pastor Augustus H. Reinke, “the father of deaf work,” in 1893. Blind work followed. Further work was initi- ated among the Polish immigrants in 1908, the Persians in 1911, and the Italians in 1922. In the decade following the Civil War, President H. A. Preus of the Synodical Conference urged that work be initiated among the blacks of our country. The suggestion was received with warm approval and immediately set into motion. The veteran home mis- sionary, Pastor John Frederick Doescher, was com- missioned as the first missionary in 1877 (Bakke, Our Colored Missions, p.20; also Der Lutheraner, Vol. 33 [1 Nov. 1877], p. 167). Energetically he began to explore the southern states, moving through Tennessee, Ar- kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Georgia, and Florida, and soon established a number of preaching stations (Nau,