# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_2019_S428 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 428 THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS its two seminaries most if not all the pastors needed to fill its vacancies; and WHEREAS, In that Operating Agreement, Section 3, Membership Matters, paragraph (a), Congregations, states: “However, all congregations in Canada shall be regularly encouraged by The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod to join Lutheran Church—Canada as soon as possible, and thereupon to sever their membership in The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod… Both church bodies acknowledge that except as set forth in this paragraph, they will neither accept new member congregations located in the country of the other, nor establish or recognize mission or preaching stations in the country of the other, without the mutual consent of the two church bodies.”; and WHEREAS, Given this wording, the agreement could be understood to restrict LCMS congregations and pastors not only from planting daughter congregations, college/university campus ministry, or even chaplaincy (hospital, police, fire, military), the very ways a congregation of Lutheran Christians would want to be involved locally in mission in Canada; and WHEREAS, In order to support the new synod and not be in competition with LCC congregations attempting to plant daughter congregations or begin other local efforts at outreach, LCMS congregations in Canada voluntarily agreed to restrict their outreach efforts in accord with the operating agreement. Now that the LCC has been established over these three decades, the time seems to have come for this voluntary restriction to be removed so that LCMS congregations in Canada are able to act locally in such mission efforts in accord with the Scriptures, especially as stifling such mission vision now would seem to be contrary to Scripture even if it works bureaucratically; and WHEREAS, The only point of discussion that has caused debate between the two Synod presidents over the years has really revolved around a handful of pastors and congregations who have wanted to leave LCC and join English District of the LCMS. This has been interpreted as a violation of paragraph 3(a); LCMS congregations can and are encouraged to join the LCC but it is not allowed for an LCC congregation to go the other way; and WHEREAS, Those few congregations in Canada that have joined the English District after the formation of the LCC have had a variety of reasons for this change in membership, and have only done so after due process in their voters’ assemblies; and WHEREAS, This has not radically undermined the Operating Agreement, nor the stability of the LCC, and the East District in particular; and WHEREAS, The fact that the Operating Agreement paragraph 3(a) specifically mentions that “mutual agreement is required” to “accept new member congregations located in the country of the other” means the two church bodies recognize that such cases might come up as an English District congregation in Canada expanding its ministry with a satellite church; or a mission plant that wants to remain in the English District when it is recognized as a congregation independent of its mother congregation; or an LCC congregation for other than doctrinal reasons decides it wants to join the LCMS. It seems logical that for the incidental happening of these events, partner church bodies as close as the LCMS and LCC should be able to work through this; therefore be it 2019 Convention Workbook Resolved, That the Synod in Convention instruct the President of Synod to draft a new paragraph 3(a) with the President of Lutheran Church—Canada, also including in these discussions the East Regional Pastor of LCC and the Presidents of the English District and the SELC District, as well as appropriate staff members. We ask that particular attention be given to these two issues in regard to the current Operating Agreement: the free movement of congregations and pastors between LCMS and LCC in both directions including those now in process, and the ability to plant daughter congregations or other ministries such as chaplaincies freely by LCMS churches; and be it further Resolved, That this be done in a timely manner and that the LCMS Synod President report to the 2022 Synod convention on progress in this revision; and be it further Resolved, That the Synod in convention reaffirm our desire to seek to continue good fraternal cooperation between our two synods, supporting each other in times of need as well as celebration as we have done over these past 32; and be it finally Resolved, That the Synod in convention encourage LCMS congregations in Canada to do the same, through such activities as preaching for one another in times of sickness or vacancy and sharing educational opportunities, as together we seek to proclaim Christ Crucified and Risen for a fallen world. Gethsemane, Windsor, ON; Peace, Windsor, ON; Saint Luke, North York, ON; Circuit 7 (Canada East), English District; Circuit 8 (Canada West), English District Ov. 5-06 To Amend Bylaw 3.9.5.2.2 Regarding Altar and Pulpit Fellowship with New Church Bodies Formed by Partner Churches WHEREAS, The first objective of The Lutheran Church— Missouri Synod (LCMS) is to: “Conserve and Promote the unity of the true faith (Eph. 4:3-6; 1 Cor. 1:10), work through its official structure toward fellowship with other Christian church bodies, and provide a united defense against schism, sectarianism (Rom. 16:17), and heresy”; and WHEREAS, The President of the Synod is its chief ecumenical officer (Bylaw 3.3.1.1.2) and the Commission on Theology and Church Relations (CTCR) has the responsibility to “assist the President of the Synod at his request in discharging his constitutional responsibilities for maintaining doctrinal integrity as he relates to other church bodies” (Bylaws 3.9.5.2.2); and WHEREAS, This bylaw requires CTCR approval before a church body may apply “for formal recognition of altar and pulpit fellowship with the Synod” at a Synod convention (Bylaw 3.9.5.2.2 [b]); and WHEREAS, The President of Synod may declare fellowship with a small, formative emerging confessional Lutheran church body that requests recognition of altar and pulpit fellowship with Synod, after consultation with the Praesidium and approval by the commission, subject to the endorsement of subsequent Synod convention (Bylaw 3.9.5.2.2 [c]); and WHEREAS, The Board for International Mission may propose at convention a recognition of fellowship with a mission of the Synod that becomes a self-governing church body with the approval of the commission (Bylaw 3.9.5.2.2 [d]); and