# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_2019_S383 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) X. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 13-03 TASK FORCE by Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, and Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne, to this end, especially the recent establishment of 100 percent guaranteed tuition, and encourage continued support of our seminaries at the Synod, district, congregational, and individual level. 7. To consider relevant recommendations in the 4-06A and 5-14A task force reports Recommendation: That in concurrence with 4-06A (“Districts vigorously encourage the establishment of multi-point parishes”), the LCMS Office of Pastoral Education with the Council of Presidents develop resources that assist districts in serving congregations that are no longer able to support a full-time pastor. These resources will include, but are not restricted to, materials to assist consideration of the consolidation of congregations, creation of multiple-point parishes, models of ministry in rural and urban settings, revitalization, peer-to-peer congregational support, and bivocational pastors. Recommendation: Recognizing the benefit of local expertise, circuit visitors are encouraged to fulfill their duties to ensure the provision of pastoral care for vacant congregations within the circuit and to work with area congregations to provide fraternal support for one another. 8. That in its work the task force encourage the ongoing work of the district lay training programs and the CUS programs for evangelism and outreach in order to identify, equip, encourage, and empower men and women for mission, witness, and service to Christ and His Church Recommendation: The No. 1 lay training program is regular attendance at the Divine Service, where God’s Word is proclaimed and His Sacraments administered. This should be supplemented by each pastor by the availability of regular adult classes in each congregation studying not only God’s Word, but also our Lutheran Confessions that are a faithful exposition of it, so that all our laity may know and understand that which they believe and confess. Additional resources are available through Every One His Witness, the publications of Concordia Publishing House, and resources for advanced theological education both at the CUS and seminary level for laity who wish for a deeper understanding without pursuing full-time church work. We must start by recognizing that all of us in our daily vocations are masks of God, as Luther wrote. We encourage all congregations and their members to use these resources so that they may be immersed in God’s Word and the Confessions and ready to confess them boldly to all whom God places in our daily lives. The Synod should emphasize the importance of lay people carrying out their God-given vocations as members of the priesthood of all believers in this increasingly diverse and challenging world. Existing district lay training programs are to be commended for helping prepare people for this important service in their congregation and communities. The task force recommends that all such programs include a study of Article XIV of the Augsburg Confession to educate participants with a right understanding of the great blessings received by members of the congregation when they are served by their pastor, the servant of the Word. This will ensure that there is a clear exposition of the difference between those ministerial acts that are appropriately performed only by those holding the Office of the Holy Ministry (public teaching, preaching, and administration of the Sacraments, not as a matter of lording over, but of service, e.g., Matt. 23:11) and the work of the laity as members of the royal priesthood of believers.16 383 Summary of the Minority Report There are several reasons for the submission of this minority report: + Omitted from the majority report are recommendations for church leaders who are “commissioned ministers” of the Synod, along with those who belong to “the priesthood of all believers”—they, too, exercise significant church leadership positions and are facing current and future challenges in their ministry. + The majority report fails to establish a minimum standard for pastoral formation; instead, it focuses the majority of its task force labors in defending and promoting one model of theological education—the residential model of pastoral formation—and minimizes proven nonformal and alternative models of theological education that sufficiently form pastors and that meet the biblical standard (1 Timothy 3; Titus 1). + It was necessary to share additional comments and recommendations that are derived from personal graduate studies and from ministry experiences as a parish pastor, overseas missionary and theological educator, and district president. Summary of the recommendations: + That a significant number of LCMS congregations consider the gathering of His people around Word and Sacrament, and for the extension of His Gospel in new places, through a network of house churches. + That male teachers who were educated at one of our Concordia universities, and who possess the pastoral qualifications expressed in 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1, be encouraged to pursue SMP pastoral formation so that they can serve in a bi-vocational ministry. + That those who occupy and serve within the pastoral office be strongly encouraged to acquire at least a “S-3 level” of fluency in the Spanish language. + That the SMP curriculum be developed in the major languages spoken in the U.S., beginning with the Spanish language, so that congregations can be established within, and pastors formed among, the indigenous leaders of that language group. + That the SMP curriculum be digitalized and made available at the district level at no cost as a way of equipping congregational elders, and other selected congregational members within “the ministry of the baptized,” so that they might become mature disciples of Jesus Christ and be better equipped for their leadership and ministry among God’s people. + In response to the task force assignment to establish a minimum standard for pastoral formation, we would recommend that the current SMP program serve as the minimum standard for pastoral formation, with the M.Div. serving as the optimum standard. + That a “university model” of pastoral formation be incorporated into our Concordia University System through onsite and distance-education platforms, with the student being assigned to a local LCMS congregation for his fieldwork ministry practicums. 2019 Convention Workbook