# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_2019_S367 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) IX. 2016 RESOLUTION 13-01A TASK FORCE REPORT b. In this narrow sense the authority of the Preaching Office—that is, the rightly ordered divine call to act on behalf of both Christ and His Church— is demonstrated and emphasized (AC XIV). between the royal priesthood and the Office of Public Ministry in the LCMS ought to be encouraged on several levels. We recommend consideration of the following ideas. a. 12. Vocation is of critical importance in considering the relationship of royal priesthood and the Office of Public Ministry. It prompts every believer to ask the question, “Whom do I serve as a priest within the ‘three estates’ (home, church, society)?”163 A royal priest ordained to the Office of Ministry asks the same question and his divine call assigns him to shepherd a particular flock and/or to teach and oversee in particular places among particular people, in a particular community or in a particular context of ministry.164 For congregations: i. The local church is where the relationship between the Office of Public Ministry and the royal priesthood is lived out. Pastors should be encouraged to teach about that relationship. In so doing, they are preparing royal priests in their sacrificial, intercessory, and teaching/witnessing responsibilities and also providing a greater understanding of the Lutheran teaching of the Office they hold. ii. The CTCR study on the royal priesthood can be of great benefit for use in congregations. A discussion guide and Bible study materials are being prepared by the CTCR. V. Facilitating Further Conversation The Task Force has sought “to facilitate an ongoing conversation and communication among laity, districts, and the Synod in order to foster the blessed complementary relationship between the royal priesthood and the Office of the Public Ministry.”165 We offer a two-part report concerning the matter of facilitating conversation: first, identifying steps we have taken and, second, offering ideas for an ongoing process of discussion in congregations, districts, and Synod. Prior to those two parts, however, we want to offer a plea to the Synod to make the great blessings of the royal priesthood and the Office of Public Ministry and their relationship to one another a matter of ongoing, regular, fervent prayer. The conversations we have with one another, as important as they are, cannot rival the importance of the conversations with God that He invites and commands for “nothing is so necessary as to call upon God incessantly.”166 And, as we pray, may we ask our Father to remind us that we speak with brothers and sisters, not enemies. 1. Steps Taken Prior to This Report’s Release Because of some debate over and disagreement with parts of two 2016 Convention resolutions (13-01A and 13-02A), our task force proposed that conversation about such controverted matters begin under the auspices of the Office of the President and the Council of Presidents. We saw a need for face-to-face conversations within a setting that (1) allowed for different perspectives to receive a full hearing; (2) afforded a measure of privacy to the conversations in order to minimize mischaracterizations and rumors; (3) prevented a delay in considering matters that were causing some measure of turmoil; and (4) could be carried out without incurring unreasonable costs to the Synod. The chairman of the task force was invited to present to the COP (November 2017) the initial results of the task force’s theological perspective on the relationship of the royal priesthood and Office of Public Ministry (Parts I, II, and III above). The discussion that followed that presentation was a helpful element in the process of drafting this report and offered an initial opportunity for conversation between the Praesidium and the presidents of our districts. The chairman of the Task Force was again invited to the September 2018 meeting of the COP with ample time to report on and lead a discussion regarding the Task Force’s work. Then, at its November 2018 meeting, the COP scheduled a full day of study on the topic of priesthood and Office, including not only the Council, but also some additional individuals. 2. Ideas for Future Conversations in Congregations, Districts, and Synod Profitable ongoing and future discussion of the relationship 367 iii. CPH may wish to consider developing materials (a book, briefer studies, curricular materials) on this topic. iv. b. Laity, together with their pastors, are encouraged to study again the Small Catechism— we particularly commend the use of the 2017 edition of Luther’s Small Catechism with Explanation. For educational institutions and events: i. Both seminaries and our university system can be asked to examine their respective curricula to determine whether they are adequately addressing the doctrine of the royal priesthood. Candidates for the ministry ought to have a solid understanding of the Priesthood and its responsibilities and its importance in the mission of the Church. This is also the case for those who are studying for commissioned ministries as well as all other students. ii. Materials on this topic can be prepared for use in LCMS campus ministries also for LCMS students who are pursuing secular careers. iii. Each seminary may also consider inclusion of these topics at an annual symposium or other events. For example, Concordia Seminary may consider including it at a Hispanic ministry training event sponsored by the Center for Hispanic Studies or at its annual Multi-Ethnic Symposium. Similarly, events sponsored by CTSFW, such as its biennial Urban Ministry conference or Luther Hostel, could also feature this topic. iv. In addition to conversations and discussion within the Synod’s educational institutions, we also encourage participating in Best Practices Conference(s), Doxology, and other such gatherings as avenues for expanding attention to this topic. 2019 Convention Workbook