# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_2019_S344 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 344 VII. FINAL REPORT OF THE BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE ON LUTHERAN SCHOOLS bon Committee on Lutheran Schools” (RESOLUTION 8-03A) At the 2013 Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS) Convention, Resolution 3-04 passed “To Authorize a Blue Ribbon Committee on Lutheran Schools.” Through this resolution, the Office of National Mission (ONM) was authorized to convene a Blue Ribbon Committee on Lutheran Schools to make a comprehensive analysis of schools offering collaborative and creative options for the future of Lutheran education. Consideration was given to specific issues and topics for the committee to address and who might serve to give the broadest perspectives of the future of Lutheran education in the Synod. A working Task Force was established consisting of individuals from all areas of Lutheran education, and from this larger committee, four task groups were assigned. The Committee was organized by the Rev. Bart Day and chaired by Mr. Jeffrey Beavers with consultation assistance provided by Tara Mulder. The entire Blue Ribbon Committee met in St. Louis for five, two-day sessions: May 2016, October 2016, February 2017, May 2017 and October 2017. At each of these five meetings, the individual task groups met during the allotted break-out work sessions and collaborated as a whole group. Subsequently, after the work of the Blue Ribbon Task Force had commenced, the direction and focus of the working group was modified and redefined at the 2016 LCMS Synodical Convention through Resolution 8-03A. Additional direction was given through this new resolution that guided further discussion and group objectives. Working Purpose Statement: “We want to maximize our ability to catalyze our discipleship through Lutheran education for the 56 million children in the United States.” Dr. Jon Mielke – Superintendent of Lutheran Schools, Indiana District LCMS Background (Scope, Focus and Process): The committee gathered in fall of 2016 to introduce and make initial presentations; the task force reassembled twice in the spring of 2017 to break into individual groups and further ascertain information through email, survey and research. Reverend Dr. Lee Hagan conducted a conference call at a meeting that included Val Rhoden-Kimbrough, director of human resources, to determine the progress of the project/study that Concordia Plan Services undertook for Ordained Ministers. A salary modeler was developed as a tool to assist calling congregations in determining a salary reflective of the cost of living in the geographic area of the church, the years of experience and the educational training of the church worker. The project/study enables congregational leaders to obtain a salary scale by entering zip codes and using a county multiplier to receive detailed information. Recommendations • Ask Concordia University presidents to explore and strategize ways to continue to provide outstanding financial aid and scholarships to those students studying to become Lutheran church workers. • Provide incentives for teachers; rent coverage, a signing bonus, debt reduction, possibly a congregation member that is identified by the pastor to adopt the graduate as a guardian angel (that angel could give a monetary gift monthly for one year, e.g.), tuition breaks for their children who attend their Lutheran school, etc. • Seminaries and Concordias continue to teach sound personal finance strategies to future teachers and pastors. • In response to the concern for recruitment and wellness of future church workers by reducing educational debt, the 2019 LCMS Convention create a Blue Ribbon Task Force to explore the viability and worth of respective university and seminary campuses, reduce debt, increase endowments and church worker grants, assess the most effective and financially viable ways to recruit and train church workers, and consider consolidating the number of church worker programs with the intent to present findings at the 2022 Convention. Committee Charges: 1. Analyze, account for and address the economic needs of Rostered and non-Rostered workers and teachers and how those needs will impact congregations where they serve; 2. Establish a set of collaborative and creative options for the future of Lutheran Schools in the 21st century; 3. Develop and implement pilot projects that may produce creative solutions related to the challenges currently faced by Lutheran schools. • Encourage all congregations and schools to implement Concordia Plan Services church worker salary modeler when determining teacher and administrator salaries. *NOTE: “The Blue Ribbon Committee on Lutheran Schools” and “Blue Ribbon Task Force” are used interchangeably throughout this report. • Encourage the LCMS in convention to recommend that the Lutheran Church Extension Fund (LCEF) and the LCMS Foundation explore ways to minimize student indebtedness along with the Concordia University System. Group One: Economic Needs Task: Analyze, account for and address the economic needs including an assessment of compensation of Rostered and nonRostered workers and teachers and how those needs will impact congregations where they serve. Group Members: Dr. Steven Buuck – Chief Executive Officer, Faith Lutheran Middle School & High School, Las Vegas, NV Rev. Dr. Lee Hagan – President, Missouri District LCMS Mr. Ronald Henschen – Teacher, Metro East Lutheran High School, Edwardsville, Ill. 2019 Convention Workbook Conclusions: Lutheran education is a noble calling, yet it is facing significant challenges. Data support a real need for synodical entities to bring resolution to indebtedness for church workers. With the impending retirement of many teachers and administrators coupled with the diminishing numbers of Lutheran Teacher Diploma (LTD) candidates enrolling in the Concordia University System, there is an increased sense of urgency to recruit and retain qualified young people in the Lutheran teaching ministry. The desire to enter the vocation of education is lessening due to several factors including