# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_2019_S270 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 270 II. THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS­­—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS • The fact of God’s anger itself indicates that they have sinned, for He meets the righteous as a friend. 4. John Oswalt says in his commentary on this verse, “Thus to wait for the Lord is to live the covenant life, to commit the future into God’s hands by means of living a daily life that shows that we know his ways of integrity, honesty, faithfulness, simplicity, mercy, generosity, and self-denial. The person who does not do these things may be waiting for something, but he or she is not waiting for the Lord.”6 What do you think he means? Do you agree? How does our behavior reflect our trust in the Lord? • This sinful rebellion has persisted for a long time, it was no brief memory lapse of God’s righteous ways. • All have sinned, and this sin is defilement, “defilement in the presence of the absolutely Clean One.”7 • They can no longer distinguish clean from filthy; in fact, what they regard as righteousness is in reality disgustingly unrighteous. • Sin’s wages are manifested in them — they wither and dry up like a leaf until the sheer force of their sins severs them completely from their source of life. 5. We have argued that this verse should be seen as the way God acts. (Cf. Delitzsch’s statement above, that God comes to meet us again and again as a friend.) In what ways does God come to meet us now? • “[N]o one is even concerned enough about the situation to cry out to God for help.”8 8. Oswalt suggests that one of the ways we experience God hiding His face is when His Word seems to be ineffective. Have you experienced this when trying to share God’s Word with another person to comfort them, encourage them, admonish them or warn them? How was your response similar to or different from Isaiah’s? • Israel won’t even wrestle with God anymore — won’t take hold of Him, cling to Him for rescue and blessing, hold on to His promises for dear life. “You have hidden your face from us.” 6. There is a tension in this passage already that the commentators seem to pass by on their way to the bigger tension that the second half of this verse will introduce. Isaiah seems to be pleading insistently with God to act how we expect Him to act — to come and deliver His people, to intervene and rescue them from their enemies. At the same time, Isaiah admits that God acts in unexpected ways. How well do you think you know how God works? Do you expect Him to act in unexpected ways in your life? If God acts in unexpected ways, can you still trust Him? Luther explains the Biblical idea of God “hiding His face”: God’s face is God’s very presence either in the Word, the promise and the sacraments, where God’s thought is set before my conscience, or in deed, when God removes evils, pestilence, and murder. Summary: The face is called the design, or the appearance; the “face” of a house or the “face” of a tree. Therefore when God hides His face, both Word and deed, nothing remains but the face of the devil, of death, and of sin. So he says here, You have hidden Your face from us, that is, “We see no joy and peace. We see nothing but death and sin.”9 Isaiah 64:8–9 The dilemma that verse 6 brought us to has no humanly instigated or humanly managed solution. Sinful humanity can neither pacify God’s anger nor claim a right to His friendly aid. The prophet and the people for whom he speaks are left with nowhere to turn, except to God. John N. Oswalt, The Book of Isaiah: Chapters 40–66, The New International Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998), 623–624. 6 “Even in times of darkness and the hiding of Your face, You will act no differently. Your promises are there, and they stand, and you remain our Father.”11 If joyfully doing righteousness is the key to meeting God and having him work on our behalf, but we are fundamentally unable to do righteousness until God makes it possible, we are in a vicious circle. We cannot do righteousness until God enables us, but God cannot work in our lives until we do righteousness.10 Isaiah 64:5b–7 7 Oswalt, 40–66, 625. 8 Oswalt, 40–66, 626. 9 AE 17:370–371. 10 Although the “forever” of “remember not iniquity forever” leaves us looking to the future and hoping against hope that something might break this vicious circle of sinful rebellion, for the moment we rest here with Isaiah and Israel. All that the sinner can do, in the end, is simply to place himself before God and say, “Look! Your child,” and wait for Him to act. Oswalt, 40–66, 624. Justifying Christmas — Participant’s Guide | 11 5 12. Are we confident that God is our Father, too? How do we know that? (John 20:17 might provide help with this one.) We are beginning our study with 1:18, but that should not be taken to mean that verses 1–17 are unimportant. Raymond Brown provided a very valuable introduction to these verses in his little book A Coming Christ in Advent: If a Christian today were asked to tell someone who knows nothing about Christianity the basic story of Jesus Christ, where would he or she be likely to begin? I am willing to wager that not one in ten thousand would begin where the author of the Gospel that the church puts first begins — where the first line of the first page of the New Testament begins — with the majestic assurance: This is “the story of the beginning/ the origin/the genesis of Jesus Christ.” Indeed, we might approximate: “the story of the advent of Jesus Christ.” For Matthew the origin of Jesus Christ starts with Abraham begetting Isaac! In other words the story of the Hebrew patriarchs, of the kings of Judah and of other Israelites is the opening stage of the story of Jesus Christ. That such an Old Testament component to the Jesus story would not occur to most Christians today is a sad commentary on how far we have moved from our ancestors’ understanding of the good news. Matthew’s list of people who are an integral part of the origin of Jesus Christ contains some of the most significant names in the biblical account of God’s dealing with His people Israel, and I for one wish strongly that at least once a year their names were allowed to resound in the Christian church on a Sunday when all the worshiping New Testament people of God were there to hear.15 THAT HOLY THING. They all were looking for a king To slay their foes, and lift them high: Thou cam’st a little baby thing That made a woman cry. O son of man, to right my lot Nought but thy presence can avail; Yet on the road thy wheels are not, Nor on the sea thy sail! My fancied ways why shouldst thou heed? Thou com’st down thine own secret stair: Com’st down to answer all my need, Yea, every bygone prayer! 10.What have we learned about God in this passage? Can we confess with Isaiah that “no eye has seen a God besides” our God, the God who makes Himself known to us in Christ Jesus (cf. 64:4)? How is our knowledge of God’s ways even better than Isaiah’s knowledge was? (cf. Luke 10:23–24; John 14:8–11; Heb. 1:1–2) 12 AE 17:372. Focus Question: Matt. 1:18–20 1. Why does Joseph feel that he should divorce Mary? Read verse 18 again carefully. How much does Joseph know at this point? The majority view: Joseph discovered that Mary was pregnant. The “other” view: Joseph discovered that Mary was pregnant through the working of the Holy Spirit. What are the strengths and weaknesses of these two different readings of the text? 2. Why is any of this material important for Matthew? Why does it need to be included in his narrative at all? 3. What if Mary had become pregnant before the engagement? 4. What if Mary had become pregnant after the wedding? 1. Why does Joseph feel that he should divorce Mary? The theme of waiting in hopeful expectation and with patient faith comes through clearly in Isaiah’s words, but this may not have otherwise felt very much like an Advent Bible study. The opening words of our text were “borrowed” by Friedrich von Spee for the opening words of his hymn “O Savior, Rend the Heavens Wide” (LSB 355, LW 32). Fred Precht details the connections with our passage and others: 2. What is Matthew telling us about Joseph when he refers to him as “just/righteous”? 5. Why should Joseph’s internal deliberations even be recorded for us? 3. Why is it important that Joseph be involved in naming the Child? 13 Fred L. Precht, Lutheran Worship: Hymnal Companion (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1992), 40. George MacDonald, The Project Gutenberg EBook of Poetical Works of George MacDonald, �o�. � ��o���n� �a��� ����m��r �, ���� �EBoo� �������. 14 Justifying Christmas — Participant’s Guide | 2019 Convention Workbook 9. What have we learned about ourselves in this passage? Most of us here would probably say we have known for a long time that we are sinful, but, in light of this passage, we should be asking ourselves why we still feel sometimes that we know better than God does. What do our “Oh, if only You would have …” complaints say about understanding that we are the ones who need justifying — not God? Do we solve the “justification dilemma” by slipping into thinking, “I can understand why God chose me to be His own; I know that when He meets me it will be as a friend”? How often do we thank God for being the One who justifies us but then refuse to trust Him when He doesn’t act as we expect Him to? In this session, we will focus on three questions: Closing Thought A somewhat unique characteristic of this Advent hymn is its direct reference to numerous bold images, or metaphors, from Holy Scripture. Its theme reflects the ancient Introit for the Fourth Sunday in Advent with its dramatic call: “You heavens above, AE 17:371. Read Matt. 1:18–25. Perhaps, though, in light of our devotion and what we’ve learned from it, we should always pair this hymn with the following poem from George MacDonald:14 13. What have we learned about justification by grace through faith in this passage? The passage begins by raising the question of whether or not we can put our faith in this God — He hasn’t always acted to save His people the way His people expected Him to. And yet, Isaiah, like us, cannot go far without admitting that there is no other God, no one else who acts to save. The description of a sinful condition that we share with God’s people of Isaiah’s day leaves no doubt that, if there is to be a justification, a setting right of things, it can only be by grace. Finally, we place ourselves before God our Father and Maker/Remaker in simple, childlike faith: “Look, God, Your children!” Our ways of talking together about justification by grace through faith may too often risk making it seem about as significant as getting a rebate check in the mail or paying a traffic ticket online. We don’t begin to really understand and care about justification until we begin to feel the crushing weight of our own sinfulness. Otherwise, as Luther says, “we are only talking about the letters without the experience.”12 The more truly and fully we know God and the more truly and fully we know ourselves, the more powerfully do we feel the dilemma that this passage lays before our hearts. And keep in mind, Isaiah is not talking about the fate of the nations, not raising the question of whether or not the heathen can ever be found right with God — no, he is speaking of God’s chosen, the nation He called into being and bound to Himself with His covenant of steadfast love. Justification’s dilemma is felt more powerfully by those who know that they are God’s people (cf. Rom. 7), so it is “meet, right and salutary” that we, God’s people today, should return again and again to these questions. 6 | Justifying Christmas — Participant’s Guide Session 2: Matt. 1:18–25 [rain] down righteousness; let the clouds shower it down. Let the earth open wide, let salvation spring up” (Is. 45:8). Closely associated with this are “Oh, that you would rend the heavens and come down” (Is. 64:1) and “A shoot will come up from the stump of Jesse; from his roots a Branch will bear fruit” (Is. 11:1). Not to be overlooked are the references to Christ as the sun (more direct in the German) — “His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance” (Rev. 1:16b)—and as the “bright Morning Star” (Rev. 22:16b), all pointing directly to him as the Redeemer, whose coming is entreated with deep fervor.13 11. Is the knowledge that God acts in unexpected ways comforting or disturbing? Why? What has been the most surprising way in which God has ever acted? (Phil. 2:5–11) Concluding Discussion As Luther expresses it, John Oswalt points out the dilemma we find ourselves facing: Isaiah may be able to say that God must come and deliver them because of His character, but Isaiah knows that he cannot say God must deliver them because of their character. In a passage that reminds us of Romans 3, we see the breadth and depth of Israel’s sin: 7. The image that Isaiah uses in verse 6 is both embarrassing and offensive. It is not the sort of thing that Christians talk about on Sunday morning — or ever. And yet, the metaphor is extremely well chosen. In a way, the image of the menstrual cloth is even more forceful than that of the corpse. The corpse may illustrate the loss of life and the rotting of the body that follows, but the menstrual cloth symbolizes an opportunity for new life that will never be realized. It is the chance for life now turned to waste. What other images does the Bible use for man’s complete inability to rescue himself from his own sinful condition? See Psalm 38 for another cluster of images. 7 Raymond E. Brown, A Coming Christ in Advent (Collegeville, Minnesota: Liturgical Press, 1988), 18. 15 8 | Justifying Christmas — Participant’s Guide It is this intricately interwoven situation that allows Mary to give birth to her child in safety, the true story of the child’s origin to be told and Joseph to assume the role of legal father/guardian. Truly, this is a wonder, and it should make