# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_2019_S261 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) II. THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS­­—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS 261 Justifying Christmas L e a d e r ’ s Quotations marked AE are from Luther’s Works, American Edition (56 vols; St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House and Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1955–86). G u i d e © 2017 The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod 1333 S. Kirkwood Road St. Louis, MO 63122 888-THE LCMS • lcms.org/ctcr Quotations marked WA are from the Weimar Ausgabe (“edition”) of Luther’s Works. Luthers Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe. 65 vols. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau, 1883–1993. This work may be reproduced by a churches and schools for their own use in the study of the Scriptures. Commercial reproduction, or reproduction for sale, of any portion of this work or of the work as a whole, without the written permission of the copyright holder, is prohibited. Scripture quotations are from the ESV Bible® (The Holy Bible, English Standard Version®), copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved. can find brief introductions to the prophet and his historical setting in our study Bibles. Isaiah is the prophet quoted most frequently in the New Testament,3 so many of us are familiar with certain passages from his writings. What do we remember of the career of this eighth-century B.C. prophet? Horace Hummel provides the following one-sentence summary of Isaiah’s career: Justifying Christmas L e a d e r ’ s Isaiah lived through, witnessed, and commented on one of the major turning points in Israel’s history— from the halcyon days of empire and independence under Uzziah through the fall of Samaria and the semi-escape of Judah only by accepting colonial status under the relentless pressure of the Assyrian colossus.4 G u i d e Session 1: Is. 64:1-9 Introduction to the Bible study series “Justifying Christmas”: that’s the title that has been chosen for this Bible study series. What thoughts and expectations come to mind when you hear it? Most of us probably begin running through a mental list of the various apologetic questions and challenges we Christians face every year as the celebration of our Savior’s birth approaches — “How can you justify spending so much money on gifts when so many people have nothing?” “How can you justify incorporating Santa Claus into your family traditions?” “How can you justify celebrating Jesus’ birth during an originally pagan festival?” And the list goes on and on. That, however, is not what this Bible study will be about. “Justifying Christmas” will not help us learn new and clever ways to justify what we do every December; rather, it will help us see how the Scriptures connected with the birth of Jesus proclaim the good news of justification by grace through faith. In other words, we’ll be studying how Christmas justifies us as part of God’s gracious work in Christ Jesus to justify sinners. And if that’s what the Advent and Christmas Scriptures are proclaiming, then we will better see how everything we do at this time of year — our readings and songs, our worship gatherings and family gatherings, our customs and traditions — is or should be a celebration of how “God, to whom man can find no way, has in Christ (the hidden center of the Old Testament and the manifested center of the New) creatively opened up the way which man may and must go.”1 Martin Franzmann, Seven Theses on Reformation Hermeneutics: A Report of the Commission on Theology and Church Relations (St. Louis: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, 1969), 4. Franzmann added an explanatory footnote to 1 Chapters 56–66 are not an awkward addendum to Isaiah, but the culmination of the book’s overall message. They must be interpreted as an integral part of the original book of Isaiah and not as an independent literary work that is only marginally connected with chapters 1–55. The inspired book is divinely intended to be read as a whole.7 With respect to Isaiah 64, three brief introductory points should be made here: [If part or all of the above is used in the announcement of an invitation to the Bible study, the instructor need only briefly review this series introduction for the class at the first session.] Introduction to Session 1: Is. 64:1–9 There is a little lectionary irony in the fact that this “500th Christmas since the Reformation” should fall during Year B of our three-year lectionary, the year “devoted to” the Gospel according to Mark. Mark offers us no account of the birth of our Lord. For the purposes of our study, however, this is a blessing in disguise, for this forces us to consider a variety of texts rather than focus on one (familiar) longer narrative. And this year we have what is easily the most urgent and demanding of Advent beginnings in the almost desperate plea of Isaiah that God would burst the heavens and come down.2 Isaiah 64:1–9 will likely raise many questions for the participants of this study (and hopefully even more by the end of the hour), but we will let our series theme provide the focus and control the boundaries of our discussion in this Bible study. Still, some introduction to the passage is required, especially if the class is not familiar with Old Testament history. The instructor will be the best judge of just how much introduction is needed, but both instructor and students his summary statement of “radical gospel,” which reads, “To avoid any possible misunderstanding, it may be noted that ‘may’ signifies ‘is permitted and enabled by God’ and ‘must’ indicates that there is no second way.” The Old Testament Reading for the First Sunday of Advent, Year B, is Is. 64:1-9. Cf. Year A is Is. 2:1-5 (“Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord”) and Year C is Jer. 33:14-16 (“I will cause a righteous Branch to spring up for David”). 2 Justifying Christmas — Leader’s Guide | whole. Students may be familiar with critical approaches that divide the book of Isaiah (and even the person of Isaiah) into first, second, third and so on; however, Oswalt reports that “the idea of several independent books of Isaiah is in the eclipse.”6 The instructor is referred to the very helpful section of Reed Lessing’s introduction, which provides a detailed argument as to why such segmented approaches should be “eclipsed” by a more careful and congenial reading of the whole book. His section “The Relationship between Isaiah 40–55 and Isaiah 56–66” concludes, 3 1. It is very difficult to determine the historical setting of Isaiah 64. In his brief “Excursus: The Historical Setting of 63:15-19,” John Oswalt describes the challenges of determining that historical setting (including that of subsequent chapters) and the problems this difficulty has led to in the history of the interpretation of this section of Isaiah. Oswalt shows that the evidence is inadequate to support any of the “creative” theories proposed and adds, This [passage] is a cry that would have particular poignancy in the light of the deliverance from Babylon, but the theological necessity of such action was as clear in the prophet’s own day as it would be in any coming day. There is no justification for an attempt to interpret the perennial message of this passage on the basis of a hypothetical historical setting that is neither explicit nor implicit in the book, and that is not supported by any historical source.5 If the theological issues and necessities that Isaiah addressed are still facing us today, we need to hear the prophet as much as his original audience(s) did. 2. Although Isaiah’s vision is far-reaching in both time and space, his book is intended to be read as a unified 3 John N. Oswalt, The Book of Isaiah: Chapters 1–39, New International Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1986), 3. Horace D. Hummel, The Word Becoming Flesh: An Introduction to the Origin, Purpose, and Meaning of the Old Testament (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1979), 191. 4 John N. Oswalt, The Book of Isaiah: Chapters 40–66, New International Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998), 617. 5 In response to such unsupported theories of multiple authorship during distinct periods of history, Oswalt argues, It is an easier supposition to imagine one author who receives a theological vision so large that it must be extended out beyond his own time and place to encompass other times and places whose details he can only dimly perceive and that are significant only insofar as they provide backdrops for the theological issues being addressed.8 3. Righteousness is one of the main themes that unites the book of Isaiah into a literary unity. One of the two main themes that Lessing uses to show the unity of the whole book of Isaiah is that of righteousness, the very theme we need to focus on. Pages 12–15 of Lessing’s introduction provide invaluable introductory material for this study as well as for anyone interested in reading Isaiah as a unified text. Lessing notes that instances of the ‫צְדָקָה‬/‫( צֶדֶק‬ṣedeq/ṣədāqâ),9 or “righteousness” word group, appear 81 times in the book and “bind together all sixty-six chapters.”10 6 Oswalt, 40–66, 4. R. Reed Lessing, Isaiah 56–66, Concordia Commentary (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2014), 20. 7 8 Oswalt, 40–66, 452 footnote 23. The study follows the Hebrew transliteration convention (Academic style) presented in The SBL Handbook of Style, 2nd ed. (Atlanta: SBL Press, 2014), 56–57. 9 10 Lessing, Isaiah 56-66, 12–13. 4 | Justifying Christmas — Leader’s Guide 2019 Convention Workbook