# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_2016_S366 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 366 UNIVERSITY EDUCATION 7-07 To Modify Governance of CUS Colleges and Universities Whereas, Higher education is in a time of significant change, including but not limited to demographic shifts in prospective student populations, increasing market competition from non-profit and forprofit providers of education, ongoing innovations in technology and academic program-delivery models, increasing compliance demands, and growing financial complexities; and Whereas, Christian colleges and universities face additional challenge to be faithful to their confession in an increasingly secular culture; and Whereas, To survive and thrive in today’s highly competitive and complex environment, Christian institutions of higher education require informed, specialized, and experienced boards of regents, with a common commitment to education in the context of the Christian Gospel, an understanding of and passion for the unique missions of the institutions they govern, a multiplicity of skill sets to support the specific needs of the institutions they govern, and the capacity to support these institutions with their time, talent, treasure, and other resources; and Whereas, The current system of regional and national Synod elections of regents does not always provide regents who are as informed, skilled, and experienced as is necessary to meet the specific needs and challenges of the colleges and universities of the Concordia University System (CUS) to which they are elected; and Whereas, The size, scale, and complexity of the CUS colleges and universities, now exceeding 35,000 students and half a billion dollars in combined budgets, require executive leaders of academic backgrounds who support and promote a Christ-centered, valuesoriented education, and possess a diverse set of abilities, including fund-raising, organizational and managerial, higher education law and compliance, and financial; and Whereas, The boards of directors of the individual CUS colleges and universities are subject to applicable local law and regional accreditation standards; and Whereas, The CUS colleges and universities desire to preserve and extend their identity as Lutheran institutions of higher education which offer quality, affordable education; and Whereas, The structure of the Concordia University System, established in 1992, is in need of modification to meet the current and future challenges of Lutheran higher education; therefore be it Resolved, That 2016 LCMS convention give thanks to God for the treasures it has in its nine colleges and universities; and be it further Resolved, That the governance structures of the individual CUS colleges and universities be changed to provide the following: • The board of regents of each college or university will determine the total number of regents, all of whom will be appointed by that respective board. • Each board of regents will include among its members the president of the geographic LCMS district in which the college or university is located. • Each board in its appointments of regents will consider candidates (including ordained, commissioned, and lay individuals) recommended from LCMS districts in proximity to the college or university, as well as any other recommendations that such board considers appropriate. • All regents must be active members of congregations of the LCMS. and be it further 2016 Convention Workbook Resolved, That the process of selecting the presidents of the individual CUS colleges and universities be changed to provide that each board of regents will choose its institution’s president after it conducts an appropriate search process from among a qualified pool of members of the Synod or members in good standing of the Synod’s congregations; and be it finally Resolved, That the Synod’s Bylaws be amended to reflect such changes to the governance structure and presidential selection process of the individual CUS colleges and universities. Board of Directors, Eastern District; New England District; Florida-Georgia District 7-08 To Adjust Election Process for College and University Presidents Whereas, The process of election of a president of a Concordia University System (CUS) college or university (Bylaw 3.10.5.5.2) begins with a local search committee that prepares a short list of at least five candidates; and Whereas, The short list is submitted to a three-member panel for prior approval, the panel consisting of the President of the Synod, the district president on the institution’s board of regents, and the chair of the CUS Board of Directors; and Whereas, This prior-approval panel thus creates the final slate from which the local board of regents elects its next president; and Whereas, The current bylaw provides that the prior-approval panel may choose to remove names from the short list by a twothirds majority vote; and Whereas, When these votes come from the President of the Synod and the chair of the CUS board, it distances the process from the local and regional constituents of each CUS school; and Whereas, The local and regional constituents of each CUS school are highly invested in the direction and future of the CUS school and are involved in the support and teamwork of the school’s leadership; and Whereas, The local influence and voice of the students (and their LCMS families) attending each school is essential; therefore be it Resolved, That Synod Bylaw 3.10.5.5.2 (d) (1) be amended to expand the prior-approval panel to include a representative of the college or university’s board of regents as chosen by that board; and be it further Resolved, That Synod Bylaw 3.10.5.5.2 (d) (2) be amended to require the prior-approval panel to make their decision to remove names from the short list by a three-fourths majority vote. Board of Directors, Northwest District; Board of Directors, Florida-Georgia District 7-09 To Reaffirm Bylaws Governing Composition of CUS Boards of Regents Whereas, The universities and colleges of our Synod continue to be blessed by God and are growing in their enrollment of students and faculty; and Whereas, These universities and colleges, which are located throughout our Synod, can best understand the unique opportunities and challenges that they face in their locations; and