# Lehre und Wehre_St. Louis Missouri_M rz 1855_S66 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 66 A Statement by the Reverend Pastor Löhe's, etc. more and more bright sides coming to the fore, we by no means proceed from the principle held by certain theologians here, that peace and amicability among theologians with respect to doctrinal differences is a bright side of a church. Rather, we count it precisely among the increasingly prominent bright sides of the church of our fatherland that that very peace, that amicability, that shrinking from a struggle which disturbingly opposes the comfort and coziness of living, eating, and drinking together, is now almost everywhere beginning to vanish over there as well. But the most beautiful bright side appears to us to be this: that in Germany people are now coming more and more to the insight that precisely on the part of those who have hitherto passed for the representatives of Lutheran orthodoxy, the model of the old Lutheran doctrine is being gradually abandoned and its direction is turning toward Rome, and that, in opposition to this, people are now entering the lists and, regardless of what high authorities of the present day are thereby attacked, are fighting ever more resolutely for the endangered, precious inheritance of the fathers." Finally, the paper also contains an essay: "Dr. Rudelbach on Ordination. Yet Another Shadow Side of the German-Lutheran Church." Characteristic of this essay is the following passage. "However regrettable it now is that Dr. Rudelbach himself has publicly made known that he no longer wishes to be counted among the theologians who confess, without reservation or restriction, the whole doctrine laid down in the confessions of our church, God is nevertheless to be praised that this dear man, from whom perhaps all the more significant theologians of our church have learned, has preserved his ever-proven uprightness and sincerity, and has therefore disdained, by dishonest arts of interpretation, to twist the sense of our symbols, to read his own views into them, and thereby only bring about ever greater confusion." No. 23 contains an essay by P. Hoyer on rhythmic singing in the Christian church; further, an essay "On the History of the Conference Held at Leipzig on the 2nd of August of Last Year." This is an extract of a German letter which shows "that neither was the voice of the Conference also the voice of Lutheran Germany; nor did all members of the Conference who did not formally protest thereby also assent; nor, finally, did all members of the Conference who did assent do so as a result of a false doctrine of church and office." After this essay follows a shorter one under the title "Correction," which is reprinted from Ehler's Kirchenblatt, and which denies an understanding of the negotiations conducted at Breslau with Grabau and von Rohr — an understanding which the brethren named do not wish to have attributed to them. The double number, Nos. 24 and 25, contains, first, the "Answer to That Directed by the Leipzig Conference to the Synod of Missouri,