# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_2016_S17 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) OFFICER, BOARD, AND COMMISSION REPORTS we rejoice together in His work, and that we may stand against the wiles of the devil. I pray that this summary—and the Detailed Reports and Commentary below—will provide a refreshing and inspiring glimpse into your OIM. We have a great story to tell as our Lord enables us to serve in LCMS mission. May blessings abound as you give prayerful consideration to the business of the Synod in convention. • PASTORAL EDUCATION (PE) Interim Unit Executive Director, Rev. J. Bart Day • While the vital work of pastoral education continues, the past triennium has brought significant change to the PE office and its work processes with the departure of the former PE Executive Director, Rev. Dr. Glen Thomas, who served the PE office with distinction. His departure has led to substantive conversations with key pastoral formation stakeholders to determine how best to continue with the position and PE’s future work. Critical in all conversations is how best to support pre-seminary, seminary, and post-seminary education in an effective manner. A clear path forward is in view and the permanent filling of the Executive Director position will soon begin. It is evident that such a position at the Synod is necessary to support the work of pastoral formation and to remain an advocate and voice for that work within the Synod structure. • MISSION ADVANCEMENT (MA) Unit Executive Director, Mr. Mark Hofman LCMS Mission Advancement plans, executes, and coordinates Synod, Inc.’s donor engagement, donor care, and fund-raising activities in order to maximize charitable gifts in support of Synod’s mission and ministry. Funding Our Mission and Ministry Corporate Synod is continually adapting to changes in the way God’s people supply financial resources intended to support nationaland international-level work. In this adaptation process, the Synod and its 35 districts react to the manner in which LCMS congregations and households prefer to fund the Synod’s stated mission, recognizing the following items: • • • • The majority of mission and ministry dollars given by households remain in the local congregation and community. The dollars flowing from LCMS households through their congregation and district to the national office has diminished in amount and impact over several decades (and especially so when those dollars are adjusted for inflation). People who live out the stewardship of all God’s gifts largely prefer a direct, personal connection to ministry efforts, and they prefer the honor of being personally asked to give. People (stewards) who give earn the moral right to see the impact of their contributions on the lives and spiritual growth of those who they, together with the Synod, are helping. For these reasons, corporate Synod engages LCMS people, congregations, and groups in a philanthropic relationship, primarily but not exclusively through MA. These efforts stand on the shoulders of prior leaders and fund-raising teams going back to the Synod’s first Stewardship Department. Where We Must Go—2016 and Beyond In the coming triennium, corporate Synod and its various program areas and ministry efforts will confront both internal and external challenges to adequately funding Constitution- and conventionmandated activities. Challenges include but are not limited to the following: • The ongoing decline in overall membership (fewer LCMS households as the source of gifts) • • • • • • • • 17 A disconcertingly high annual loss in the number of active contributors (households, congregations, groups, and organizations), attributable to deaths, economic conditions, and redirected giving priorities Various expectations and obstacles that make it difficult for the Synod to identify, communicate with, and engage new donors to replace those lost in attrition A national culture increasingly hostile to charitable giving in support of religion and religiously-affiliated organizations Demographic shifts affecting philanthropy from one generation to the next, such as the loss of organizational loyalty or affinity Internal dissension, strife, and even indifference over the mission and future of the LCMS Confusion, disagreement, or a lack of understanding among laity regarding what the Synod is, what it does, and even why it exists; how the Synod and its program areas and ministry efforts are funded; and what value the Synod delivers Competition for philanthropic and charitable support from sophisticated, well-managed organizations willing to invest heavily in successful, effective advancement efforts and aggressive capital campaigns Congregations, and even some districts, struggling to maintain their own viability and vitality A failure of understanding each LCMS household well enough to appropriately and joyfully connect them to Synod’s regional, national, and international work The shifting, often unpredictable, winds of national political and economic forces Dissonance regarding the value of fund-raising and the care of contributors, as well as the place of donor-directed financial support within the Synod’s mission and ministry Recognizing these and other challenges, MA articulated and implemented a long-range vision and plan to enhance corporate Synod’s advancement (fund-raising and donor care) efforts by focusing on five significant goals and their related, desired outcomes. These goals will drive management decisions and the allocation of resources in order to achieve higher levels of trust, confidence, and satisfaction among people in the Synod, and to better balance fund-raising efficiency with donor care effectiveness. Synod leaders, including those in COMM and other units, will have distinct and indispensible roles to play in the plan’s various strategies and desired outcomes. Cautions and Counsel to Convention Floor Committees and Delegates Delegates to the Synod’s 2016 convention make decisions shaped by certain financial realities. First, the convention faces a reality that the majority of God’s people in the LCMS choose to keep worship offerings at home, in their local congregation and community. No longer are national and international witness, mercy, and life together efforts—including our missionaries and seminaries—funded through the congregation’s offering plate. Direct charitable gifts and organization-specific bequests have taken the place of the Sunday tithe in this regard, and those annual gifts and one-time bequests are supplied by a relatively small portion of the Synod’s 800,000 households. Second is the reality that corporate Synod has neither secret sources nor vast storehouses of money apart from LCMS district, congregation, and household donations. Districts, too, do not have secret sources or storehouses of money apart from what they receive from individuals or congregations. Congregations themselves do not have secret sources or storehouses of money apart from what their members contribute. Our professional workers alone—pastors, teachers, deaconesses, and other specialists—do not fund the Synod’s ministry out of their own resources. There is no “other person” or “rich family” we can turn to for money to fix, expand, start, enhance, or otherwise fund the Synod’s many ministries. 2016 Convention Workbook