# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1971_S50 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) PRESIDENT’S REPORT Sent to Reconcile ja keeping with the duties assigned to the office of the President by the Constitution and Bylaws of The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod, I would like to take this opportunity to offer the delegates a brief over- view of the major issues facing this convention during fie coming week. My remarks follow the general order of materials presented in the convention Workbook and center on the convention theme, Sent TO RECONCILE. {. Our Message: The Pure Word of Reconciliation Comyaittee 2 deals with theological and doctrinal raatters. Such matters are not merely the concern of pastors and professors. Theology and doctrine are fun- damental to our entire task, for doctrine is nothing less than the articulation of the message of reconciliation in Jesus Christ. Because of the great importance of the doctrinal concerns facing us, I will speak on these mat- ters first and at some length. God’s Word says: “Now we have received not the spirit of the world but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. Which things also we speak not in the words which man’s wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth, comparing spiritual things with spir- itual.” (1 Cor. 2:12-13) As Paul points out, the message of the cross must be preached in all its purity, for the church’s message is not the message of man or the wisdom of man, but the wisdom and the oracles of God. Therefore we can never become indifferent to the doctrine which is taught in our schools and proclaimed from our pulpits. We cannot act as if truth and falsehood are the same, or as if truth is only relative and can never be stated cor- rectly and categorically. We simply must be and re- main concerned about pure doctrine. It is no secret that in our time we have certain doc- trinal problems within our church. A person would have to be blind to deny it. On the one hand, it can be pointed out that doctrinal controversy is the sign of a living and concerned church. It can also be said that no church is ever totally free of doctrinal controversy. Yet as Paul says, “Let a man so account of us as of the ministers of Christ and stewards of the mysteries of God” (1 Cor. 4:1). As church leaders, we are all stew- ards of this Word and must constantly strive for faith- fulness to it. As we consider this matter which has received so much attention in the overtures brought before our convention, we need to make certain basics quite clear. In the first place, we must maintain with Luther in the Smalcald Articles that “the Word of God alone should establish articles of faith and no one else, not even an angel” (SA-II If 15). No church or synod creates or establishes doctrine. Only the Word does this. Dr. C. F. W. Walther, in his presidential address to the Synod in 1848, made this point clear beyond debate. The Word alone establishes our faith. In the second place, we must address ourselves to the relationship between Article 1 of the Constitution and the status of doctrinal statements and resolutions adopted by the Synod. The problem really boils down to our understanding of the Constitution. Article if of the Constitution states in simple language what “Synod and every member of Synod accepts without reserva- tion”: “The Scriptures of the Old and New Testament as the written Word of God and the only rule and norm of faith and of practice” and “all the Symbolical Books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church as a true and unadulterated statement and exposition of the Word of God.” But some seem inclined to believe that the Synod must hold the Lutheran Confessions to be in effect an exhaustive and in fact a comprehensive list of the articles of faith. Some specifically suggest that the Augsburg Confession prescribes a quantitative total of articles of faith which Lutherans must accept. Accord- ing to this view, Lutherans are not bound by anything that Scripture teaches unless it is at least implicitly taught in the Augsburg Confession or the Book of Con- cord. However, it is very clear from the writings of Dr. Walther that the actual intent of Article II is that the Synod holds Scripture to be the only rule and norm of faith and practice, and therefore the Synod accepts only what the Scripture teaches, but also everything and anything that Scripture teaches. Moreover, the Synod holds that the Lutheran Confessions are a faithful and correct presentation of the teachings of Scripture on those articles of faith which the circumstances of the time made it necessary to treat. Therefore the Synod endorses everything the Confessions say on these points as a correct exposition of Scripture, without in the least implying that in the Confessions there is a deliberate silence on certain doctrinal matters in order to leave such areas open for latitude and diversity and that con- sequently Synod may never adopt a firm position on any matter which is not already settled in the 16th-cen- tury confessional writings. Such an understanding of our confessional commit- ment is radically different from the intention of Article Il of our Constitution. It is ironic that some of those who accuse the Synod of “traditionalism” are in a sense promoting it by elevating the Confessions above the Scriptures. For it is “traditionalism” of the worst kind to ask merely whether a teaching is contained in the confessional writings rather than whether it is taught by the Scriptures. Such a practice is contrary to our confessional position itself that only the Word of God. can establish articles of faith. Moreover, it is an im- proper use of Article II of the Synod’s Constitution, because it allows paragraph 2 of Article II (which deals with our confessional commitment) to nullify paragraph 1 (which expresses our commitment to the Scriptures).