# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_2010_S247 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) synod structure and governance Whereas, A name change from “The Lutheran Church— Missouri Synod” to another may indicate a shift from not only our historical heritage but also from the first objective of the Synod, to “[c]onserve and promote the unity of the true faith” (Constitution, Art. III 1); therefore be it Resolved, That the South Wisconsin District memorialize the 2010 Synod convention to retain the name “The Lutheran Church— Missouri Synod.” South Wisconsin District 8-76 To Retain Name “The Lutheran Church— Missouri Synod” Whereas, There is worldwide recognition of the name “The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod” among Lutherans and other denominations; and Whereas, We are known for our scriptural and confessional position under that name, and our position is a reflection of our history under the grace of God; and Whereas, Altering the name of the Synod would promote confusion within and outside the Synod and require much explanation; and Whereas, The cost of changing publications, letterheads, signs, insignia, and other media would be costly and questionable stewardship; and Whereas, The name of a church body is neutral as far as the Gospel is concerned, it being clear that Roman Catholics are not found only in Rome, and Southern Baptist are found all over the United States, and Missouri Synod Lutherans are found all over the world; therefore be it Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod retain its name. East Region Pastoral Conference Northern Illinois District 8-77 To Decline Further Study of LCMS Name Change Whereas, The BRTFSSG recommends in its final report to the 2010 LCMS convention that the Synod “adopt a process leading to the renaming of the Synod” (Congregations Walking Together in Mission: The Final Report of the Blue Ribbon Task Force for Synod Structure and Governance, October 2009, p. 43); and Whereas, Overtures have been submitted to conventions of the Synod since 1962 calling for a renaming of the Synod (ibid., p. 45); and Whereas, The Synod’s Board of Directors studied the matter extensively during the 1998–2001 triennium, receiving the Name Change Task Force’s report that while 78 percent of Synod and district leadership thought a name change would have an impact on the ability to reach out to the unchurched, 58 percent of those serving on the front lines of work with the unchurched in congregations indicated that “a name change would have no impact on their ability to reach the unchurched,” (ibid., p. 46, emphasis added); and Whereas, The 1999 report of the Name Change Task Force indicated that congregational respondents “were about evenly divided on whether the name should be changed,” (ibid., p. 46); and Whereas, The 2009 survey conducted by the BRTFSSG at district conventions indicated a continued even divide (45 percent favorable, 247 40 percent unfavorable, 15 percent unsure) (ibid., Appendix 7, p. 4); and Whereas, The task of the BRTFSSG was to study and make recommendations regarding “significant fiscal implications relative to the Synod’s current structure” (ibid., p. 10); and Whereas, The BRTFSSG’s own estimates of the financial impact of their recommendations is a total per year savings of about 83 dollars per congregation and about $990,000 for Synod, Inc . (ibid., Appendix 4, p. 4.1); and Whereas, The cost of changing the name of the Synod was estimated in 1999 to be about $3–5 million to the Synod, Inc. (ibid., p. 46); therefore be it Resolved, That we, the Board of Directors of the Central Illinois District, memorialize the 2010 Synod convention to reject any proposals working toward or further studying a change in the name of the LCMS; and be it further Resolved, That we memorialize the 2010 Synod convention to place a three-convention moratorium (9–12 years) on any further study of, consideration of, or other expenditure of money toward a name change for The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. Board of Directors Central Illinois District 8-78 To Retain the Name “The Lutheran Church— Missouri Synod” Whereas, In 2005, President Gerald Kieschnick appointed the Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and Governance; and Whereas, The task force’s proposals in its final report of October 15, 2009, are far-reaching in scope and significant in import; and Whereas, Experience teaches that maximum attention must be given to details and wording in making adjustments and/or changes impinging on structure; and Whereas, The Synod would do well to proceed with prayerful and appropriate care in considering any changes; and Whereas, “The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod” is generally acknowledged around the world to be the name of THE confessional Synod; therefore be it Resolved, That Our Savior Lutheran Church, Muscatine, IA, memorialize the Synod to retain the name “The Lutheran Church— Missouri Synod.” Our Savior, Muscatine, IA; Zion, Wilton, IA 8-79 To Reject Any Proposal to Change Pastoral Candidate Certification Whereas, The President of the Synod in 2005 appointed a Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and Governance (BRTFSSG) to “do a thorough, zero-based assessment of the entirety of the system of governance and organizational structure of The Lutheran Church— Missouri Synod” and to make recommendations for improvements that “suggest a form of structure and governance for the decades ahead” (BRTFSSG Report, pp. 6–7); and Whereas, The BRTFSSG has published a document for consideration and discussion, “Walking Together—The LCMS Future: Proposals and Possibilities for Consideration and Discussion”; and 2010 Convention Workbook 2010 Convention.indb 247 4/15/10 2:40 PM