# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_1969_S484 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) STEWARDSHIP AND FINANCES; RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS 471 the Pension Fund would be adversely affected by mass withdrawals. 5. Permissive withdrawals would result in selective withdrawal against the Pension Fund, affecting the ac- tuarial assumptions pursuant to which the annuity rates have been established. 6. Federal tax consequences: a) Withdrawals by members would be subject to federal income tax as ordinary income to the extent that the amount is in excess of the members’ own con- tributions. b) More serious, in the board's opinion, is the fact that the mere existence of a right to withdraw amounts from the Pension Fund, even though such rights are not exercised, would subject all members having such right to income tax liability in the year in which such withdrawal right is granted. In other words, if per- mission to withdraw were granted in 1969, all members having such right would be deemed to have construc- tively received the amount available for withdrawal and would be required to report the taxable portion thereof as income in 1969. The taxable portion would be the entire amount of the employer contributions made to his account through the years, the interest earned thereon, and the interest earned on his personal con- tributions. This would have a particularly harsh impact on those members not desiring to effect a withdrawal, because they would have income tax liability without having the money with which to pay the tax. It is recommended by the Board of Pensions and Support that the Synod affirm its decision not to amend the Pension Plan to permit the withdrawal of account balances except in the form of an annuity payable at the time of retirement. Deferred Annuity Most of the active workers are participating in the Concordia Retirement Plan. When an active worker dies. one who also has an account in the Pension Plan for Pastors and Teachers, his widow is entitled to a benefit from the Concordia Retirement Plan and also to an annuity from the Pension Plan. The Concordia Retirement Plan pays a generous benefit which, in many instances, will be reduced con- siderably when her husband, if he had lived, would have reached what the Concordia Plans refer to as his normal retirement age. The annuity from the Pension Plan for a widow of perhaps 55 years of age will be much smaller than it would be if her husband's accumulation in the Fension Plan could continue to grow for some 10 years or more and she, being older, would have a more favorable an- nuity rate. To illustrate: (an actual case, with figures rounded to eliminate cents) Husband died at age 58; his widow was 56 She receives from CRP ______ $225.00 a month Dependent child benefit 55.00 a month Total $280.00 a month But when her husband, if he had lived, would have reached “normal” retirement age (in this case 70), the amount his widow will receive from the Concordia Re- tirement Plan becomes less, namely $74 a month, for it is then based on the amount her husband would have received as retirement income from the Concordia Re- tirement Plan. On the other hand, at the time of her husband's death, the widow was entitled to an annuity from the Pension Plan of $73 a month. But if she de- ferred receiving her annuity until the Concordia Re- tirement Plan benefit will be reduced from $225 to $74, the annuity from the Pension Plan, if begun at that time, would be about $190 a month. At the time of the husband's death the board, there- fore, offers the widow a choice of an immediate annuity or a deferred annuity. The widow does not have to wait to begin her annuity until the Concordia Retire- ment Plan benefit is reduced, but may choose to begin it at any time and receive whatever annuity is due her at that time. To date 21 widows have chosen a deferred annuity. Activities The Board of Pensions and Support met six times in 1967 and again in 1968 to carry out its assigned tasks, with special consideration given to the approval of ap- plications for retirement, disability, widow benefits, and special support grants. District subcommittees render valuable assistance by giving careful consideration to the support applications from their respective Districts and by making their recommendation to the Board of Pensions and Support. The business of conducting pension and support mat- ters is taken care of regularly by the St. Louis office. The executive secretary attended the annual Church Pensions Conference, composed of representatives of the pension departments of the various denominational groups. This conference is probably the best source of information on activities and developments in the field of church-pension programing. Your Board of Pensions and Support solicits your continued prayers in its behalf and implores the con- tinued guidance of the Lord of the church in all its efforts. BoaRD OF PENSIONS AND SUPPORT WALTER E. LICHTSINN, Chairman CLARENCE M. Moses, Secretary Emmett H. FasTENAU Frep A. HEISLER Rospert D. Murray JoHN KNIPPENBERG, Executive Secretary (12-06) Report of Board of Managers for Concordia Retirement Plan and Concordia Welfare Plan Our Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod is one of the half-dozen church bodies which by 1937 had estab- lished an organized program of benefits for its retiring