# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_1969_S362 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 362 PARISH EDUCATION AND SERVICES Moved by the considerations enunciated above, we offer the following memorial to the Synod: Resolved, That the Board of Directors be empowered to authorize a comprehensive study of the present and future design of Christian education: That the Board of Directors be empowered to ap- point a study director and an advisory committee to conduct this study: and That the appointed director be required to give a progress report to the Milwaukee convention in 1971. FACULTY ConcorDIA TEACHERS COLLEGE Seward, Nebr. W. Tu. Janzow. President FACULTY CONCORDIA COLLEGE St. Paul, Minn. WiLLt1am A. POEHLER, President (7-05) To Provide Uniform Documents for Day School Teachers WuereEas the documents which are used for calling male and female teachers reflect a different view of the call for each: The Call Documents Male: “Diploma of Vocation” uses the term “your solemn call.” Female: “Appointment to Service in the Teaching Min- istry” avoids the word “call” and speaks only of “your appointment to service.” “Supplement” to the Call Documents Male: Speaks of the teacher as “minister of the Gos- pel,” uses the word “call.” Female: Avoids both terms and uses different format: and Wuereas, This distinction causes confusion in the minds of students and congregations as to the divinity of the woman’s call: and Wuereas, The Synod has previously stated in con- vention that a woman's call is to be considered a divine call, regardless of its nature as permanent or temporary (see 1941 Proceedings, pp. 156—57, and 1965 Workbook, pp. 45—48; Proceedings, p. 99): and Wuereas, The Detroit convention suggested that the transfer of a certified graduate woman teacher from place to place follow the same procedure as that used for male teachers so far as handling the call is con- cerned (1965 Workbook, pp. 45—48: Proceedings, p. 99); therefore be it Resolved, That the Synod instruct the Board for Parish Education to develop uniform documents for male and female teachers. FacuLty CONCORDIA TEACHERS COLLEGE Seward, Nebr. W. Tu. JANzow, President MargoriE MEIER, Secretary (7-06) To Emphasize Pastoral Care to Families Introduction In its 1962 convention The Lutheran Church — Mis- souri Synod authorized the Board of Parish Education’s Family Life Committee to explore the church’s needs and resources regarding marriage education and coun- seling and to propose to Synod a “long-range, overall approach and an adequate program of action.” It also directed the Family Life Committee to consult other agencies within the Synod, such as the Wheat Ridge Foundation and the Department of Social Ministry, to cooperate in the venture. The Family Life Committee developed a blueprint for marriage education and counseling which included three phases: 1) An intensive training program for pastors; 2) Marriage education and counseling program for youth, engaged couples, and married couples in our congregations; 3) Strengthening ministerial training in marriage education and counseling at our seminaries. Implementation was delayed until a full-time direc- tor of family life education joined the Board of Parish Education staff. A model demonstration program for phase 1, the in-service training of pastors, was developed. The Pilot Studies Three experimental workshops were conducted, at Cape Girardeau, Mo., Dallas, Tex., and San Francisco, Calif. The pilots consisted of two 4-day training ses- sions with preparatory reading, presentation of theory, and application of skills. The two sessions were sepa- rated by a 5- or 6-week period. The first session began with the sociology of the American family today, including changes, problems, and expectations. It moved to a study of the dynamics of marriage and concluded with premarital preparation and referral to the community resources. The interval between sessions enabled the pastor to return to his parish and reflect on his concept of what constitutes an effective and satisfying ministry for dealing with marital disharmony. It also provided time to practice newly discovered skills and techniques. The second session stressed methodology and tech- niques of premarital and marriage counseling with em- phasis on role playing and practice counseling. The training consisted of presentations and discussions on the theology of marriage and the family, pastoral care and counseling, the family in our culture, case studies, the dynamics of good communication and relationship between husband and wife, the dynamics of good com- munication between pastor and people, and sensitivity training in small working groups. Experts were utilized as guest lecturers, and clini- cally trained pastors were used as group leaders. Op-