# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1969_S122 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) PRR ERO Sees tt eI 122 RESOLUTIONS Resolved, That the petitions to divide the District be declined; and be it also Resolved, That the Board of Directors of the Synod study the matter of the proposed division of the Atlantic District according to the guidelines adopted at this convention (Res. 4-03 and 4-04) and that the Board of Directors of the Synod present a definite proposal regarding the requested division of the Atlantic Dis- trict to the 1971 convention of the Synod. Action: Adopted as amended (16). (The second resolved, as proposed by the floor committee, had read: “That studies on the division of the District con- tinue, bearing in mind the Suidelines adopted at this conven- tion [4-03, 4-04].” In Session 13 an amendment was moved and seconded giving authority to the synodical Board of Di- rectors to divide the District. Since the constitutionality of such an action was questioned, the assembly referred the resolution back to the floor committee in consultation with the Commission on Constitutional Matters. In Session 16 a revised wording was substituted for the proposed amend- ment. This amendment was accepted by the convention as the final resolved and the entire amended resolution there- upon adopted.) To Clarify Final and Binding Nature of Board of Appeals Decisions RESOLUTION 5-30 Overtures 5-29 (CW, p. 239); 5-66U (URO, p. 59) Wuereas, It is unclear under present Bylaws prac- tice whether the Board of Appeals or the Commission on Constitutional Matters has the final and _ binding authority in cases which involve interpretations of the Constitution and Bylaws; therefore be it Resolved, That this matter be referred to a study committee, appointed by the President, which shall also include members of the Board of Appeals and the Com- mission on Constitutional Matters, to review sections in the Handbook pertinent to the appellate process and to report to the next convention. Action: Adopted (16). To Accept into Membership Certain Congregations RESOLUTION 5-31 Overture 5-76X (Unpublished overture) Wuereas, Pleasant Hill Lutheran Church of Pleasant Hill, Oreg., and Hope Lutheran Church of Woodburn, Oreg., have applied for membership in the Synod; therefore be it Resolved, That these congregations be approved for membership in the Synod; and be it also Resolved, That the signing of the Constitution take place at the convention of their District, in accordance with Section 21.03 of the Handbook. Action: Adopted (16). To Decline Report on Principles to Govern Synodical Elections and Appointments RESOLUTION 5-32 Report 5-68U (URO, pp. 59—60) Wuereas, It is the opinion of the committee that Report 5-68U detracts from the democratic nature of the Synod; and WHEREAS, The principles enunciated herein are am- biguous; therefore be it Resolved, That Report 5-68U be declined; and be it also , Resolved, That the Council of Administrators be encouraged to offer specific recommendations which relate to concrete issues as a means of clarifying these principles. Action: Adopted (16). To Revise Bylaws re Election of Circuit Counselors RESOLUTION 5-33 Overtures 5-52 (CW, p. 246); 5-55U (URO, p.55) Resolved, That Section 3.61 b of the Bylaws be re- vised to read: - .. The nominations shall be made during the election year at least 6 months prior to the convention of the District and shall be submitted to the Nominating Committee through the office of the Secretary of the District, If no candidate has received a majority, the District Secretary shall mail to each congregation in that circuit a ballot containing the names of the two men receiving the highest number of votes. and be it also Resolved, That Section 3.39 of the Bylaws delete the words, “Circuit Counselors,” and Section 3.39 b read, b. All other officers and boards may be elected in any District convention for the time of service fixed by the Con- stitution and Bylaws of the Synod. Action: Adopted (16). To Revise Bylaws 2.15 and 3.35 re Holding More than One Office RESOLUTION 5-34 Report 5-01, IV, B (CW, p. 225) Resolved, That Sections 2.15 and 3.35 of the Bylaws be revised as follows: 2.15 (and 3.35) Holding More than One Office a. No one, either in the Synod or in a District, or between the Synod and a District, shall hold more than one elective office; or more than two offices, although one or both be ap- pointive; or ever hold two offices of which one is directly responsible for the work done by the other. b. An office shall be regarded as elective only if it is an office filled through election by a synodical or a District con- vention, even though a vacancy in such an office may be filled by appointment. c. Doubtful cases shall be decided by the President of the Synod. Action: Adopted (16). 4 PEASE ae TER RHOeY tegen os i err EYEE Oberon neem enn