# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1969_S104 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) Si Ads SS ea ii To Decline to Reduce All Synodical and District Boards to Maximum of 9 Members RESOLUTION 4-10 Overture 4-21 (CW, p. 217) Wuerras, The responsibilities and work loads of the many synodical and District boards vary considerably, making it unwise to place rigid restrictions on the maxi- mum size of District and synodical boards; therefore be it Resolved, That Overture 4-21 be declined. Action: Adopted (11). RESOLUTION 4-11 (This resolution, which called for a review of the structure and functions of the Commission on Theology and Church Relations, was struck from the record by action of the convention in Session 12 because the mat- ter was already before the convention in Res. 3-08. See Overture 2-75U.) To Decline to Recess and Reconvene This Convention RESOLUTION 4-12 Overture 4-30 (CW, p. 220) Whereas, A procedure for supervision of doctrine and practice is established in the Synod; and Wuereas, The procedure proposed to recess this con- vention for an extended period and then reconvene it is not practical or feasible; therefore be it Resolved, That this convention decline to recess and to reconvene for a 3-day session. Action: Adopted (12). To Implement Autonomy for Lutheran Church — Canada RESOLUTION 4-13 Overture 4-12 (CW, p. 215) Wuereas, The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod has in previous conventions (Cleveland, Resolution 6-36, and Detroit, Resolution 4-28) encouraged Lutheran Church — Canada to proceed with plans to build up a strong, indigenous Lutheran church in Canada; there- fore be it Resolved, That The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod herewith grants authority to Lutheran Church — Canada together with the officials of The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod for the implementation of autonomy of Lutheran Church — Canada in accord with the constitution of each body. Action: Adopted (13). (Originally the final words of this resolution had been: . contingent on the favorable result of a forthcoming “ SEES ae 104 RESOLUTIONS referendum of congregations of the Lutheran Church — Can- ada.” The resolution was recommitted in Session 12 to clarify the question of the constitutionality of a referendum. The convention adopted the new version presented by the com- mittee in Session 13.) To Adopt Report on Synodical Headquarters RESOLUTION 4-14 Reports 4-03, IV, C (CW, p.204); 4-36U (URO, pp. 48—49) Wuereas, The Board of Directors of the Synod has followed the instructions of the New York convention (4-31) and has completed the studies concerning the location of synodical headquarters; and Wuereas, The findings of the board indicate St. Louis to be the preferable area; and Wuereas, Suitable facilities for expansion on an economical basis are available; therefore be it Resolved, That the headquarters of the Synod con- tinue to be located in the St. Louis area; and be it also Resolved, That the Board of Directors be encouraged to purchase property that will provide adequate space for synodical headquarters. Action: Adopted (5). To Develop Systematic Mailing Arrangement for Synodical Materials RESOLUTION 4-15 Overture 4-26 (CW, p. 218) Wuereas, There appears to be value in having a uni- fied mailing arrangement for materials from synodical boards, commissions, and agencies; and Wuereas, There are many problems associated with the proposal (scheduling, format, reader impact, etc); and Wuereas, The Coordinating Committee for Parish Services, functioning under the Council of Adminis- trators, is currently conducting a study of a unified mailing arrangement; therefore be it Resolved, That the Council of Administrators be directed to complete its study, including consultation with the field, and inaugurate whatever system of mail- ings will in its judgment best serve the interests of the Synod. Action: Referred to the Council of Administrators for action (16). To Study Changes in Program of Fiscal Review Commission RESOLUTION 4-16 Overture 4-23 (CW, p. 218) WHEREAS, It is the responsibility of the elected offi- cers of the Fiscal Review Commission to establish the