# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1969_S46 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) PRESIDENT’S REPORT For your sake and mine I begin this report with an introductory statement. In these comments I want to set forth the nature of this report. Then you and I will be able better to understand what is being said and what is meant. This report is shaped by two elements. The Synod has outlined the responsibilities of the office of the President in its Constitution and Bylaws. It directs the President to “give an accurate report to Synod of his administration” (XI, B, 5b). Obviously, however, the Synod does not work in a vacuum. In my report I in- tend to give an accounting of my administration in the light of the responsibilities assigned to the office of the President and to do so with an awareness of the setting in which we live and work as a church body. When I accepted the present term of office in 1965, I described the office of the President as that of under- shepherd and servant. I quote from the statement I made at that time: As God’s undershepherd I am pledged to lead you to the green pastures of God’s Word and to the still waters of His forgiveness. But I will fail as undershepherd if I do not call you away from what is false and dangerous. I will seek to arouse you from sleep and indifference, to stir you to keep on the move, and, if it please God, I will guide you nearer to other sheep God is gathering into His fold. As your chief servant I will seek to fill your needs by providing, directly and indirectly, for a full and faithful min- istry. But I will also prod you on to develop and use the gifts God has given you for the ministry to which He has called you. The President’s office will not rest until the people of God in our Synod are sharing the richness of God’s gracious blessings with people everywhere... . Tension develops in the office of the President when he seeks to be both undershepherd and chief servant. The President is at the same time God’s man and the people’s man. I plead with you, for the sake of God’s people in our fellowship and those whom God would reach through us, that you help me fill this double role to the highest po- tential God gives. Now, four years later, I testify at the outset that God has not failed me. He has been my own Good Shepherd. He has served me. He has faithfully sustained me with forgiveness and with every blessing of His grace. I confess that where I have failed you as a Synod, I have first failed my God. Where there has been success—and God alone rightly knows that — it is only because God has been faithful to us for Jesus’ sake. In the high office entrusted to me I have learned little but awe for the high honor in which God holds us and the perfect grace with which He always deals with us. I have learned to appreciate more deeply what it means that Jesus was our Shepherd and Servant and furthermore what it means for us to be that for each other and for the world He has loved unto death. It is necessary to say also how much I have learned from those who have gone before us. In a special way I think of those who were first called Lutherans and of our early forefathers who claimed that name with pride. They have helped me to understand the nature of the Gospel and what it means to be an evangelical Lutheran Christian. The Word of God is never clearer or surer or 46 more glorious than when Jesus Christ enlightens, se- cures, and blesses it. But this report is not an autobiographical sketch. The administration of this Synod is a joint effort, and many have shared with me all that such leadership im- plies. You have given me to stand at my side five Vice- Presidents and thirty-seven District Presidents. They have stood at their posts to listen, to speak, and to act in the name of the Synod. Let me single out two in particular. Doctor Roland P. Wiederaenders, our First Vice-President, has served us all quietly, diligently, and effectively. And until God called him home, Doctor John W. Behnken always served far beyond the call of duty. My office is also more aware than most how the Synod owes a debt of gratitude to those who are called to manage the affairs of the Synod. I call attention to the Board of Directors, which always faces difficult and heavy responsibilities. I mention Doctor Walter F. Wol- brecht and the Council of Administrators, together with our various boards and commissions and their staffs. I dare not fail to mention the faithful and dedicated service of my administrative assistant, the Reverend Arnold A. Wessler. All across the land are our sixteen colleges and seminaries with their administrations and boards of control, our Districts and their officials and staffs. Everywhere behind the scenes are the thousands of unnamed workers who make the calling of God a high career. Finally, I am constrained to call attention to those like Doctor W. F. Bulle who have so nobly led us into fields of service on behalf of those who suffer the anguish of war, the hurt of handicap, or who plead the cause of the voiceless ones whom God has placed at our feet for healing and help. The Synod directs its President to supervise the doctrine and life of the members, to supervise the man- agement of synodical affairs, and to represent the church to others. All these tasks must be viewed in the context of the objectives which prompted the formation of this Synod and which induced us to become members of it. These objectives may often seem discredited and to be in disrepute. Yet they have a sanctity all of their own. They are consistent with the Scriptures. They are de- signed to give assurance that God will exert His blessed influence through these Scriptures among us and through us. If there is any crisis at all that seems to be facing the church in our time it is this: The church has apparently forgotten the place and the power of the Gospel. Law and judgment now are being preached to the church by prophets from within and from without. After all, God has His own way at all times of making us feel our frailty and our failure. Now, as always, prophets are unpopular, and God’s Word of judgment is distasteful. Now, as always, the Word of God is a living force. It produces resentment and anger. None of us wants to be told or to be shown what he really is like. Evangelical Christians, above others, ought to know