# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1965_S285 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) rt ee SS ENS ILENE LLL DEES ELE LE LISSA D BERS, SIENA SEN iat THEOLOGY OF FELLOWSHIP O95 against false teachers, and that laymen are capable of judging doctrine. Beyond this he draws no deductions from these passages. According to the evidence from the history of the Lutheran Church these passages appear to have come into prominence, and to have been used much as they have been used in the history of The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod, about the time of the Colloquy of Thorn in Poland in 1645, when unsuccessful doctrinal discussions were conducted among Roman Catholics, Lutherans, and Reformed» It is therefore necessary that we examine, even if briefly, the chief of the passages which have since the time of the Colloquy of Thorn been quoted by some against all joint prayer with Christians of other con- fessions, no matter what the occasion. In the following we offer a brief examination of a number of these passages in context. Matt. 7:15, 16 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? In this passage Jesus warns His followers to beware of false prophets. For a correct understanding of this passage it is necessary to know what a false prophet is. This in turn calls for a Biblical understanding of what a prophet is. According to Scripture not every teacher of religion, also not every faithful teacher of the Chris- tian doctrine, is a prophet. A prophet is “one who speaks for God or a deity: a divinely inspired revealer, interpreter, or spokesman.” 6 This definition, taken from a modern dictionary, harmonizes closely with definitions of prophet and prophecy in standard lexica of the New Testament.’ As the term prophet in Scripture seems not to be used of teachers in general, but of divinely com- missioned teachers into whose mouth God has put His Word and commanded them to proclaim it, so also the false prophet is not every teacher who either from ignorance or from malice proclaims error. Rather the false prophet (Greek: pseudoprophétés) is a pseudo, a fake, who claims to be a divinely commissioned spokesman for God when in fact God has not sent him. That the false prophets against whom our Lord warns in Matt.7:15 ff. are thought of, not merely as purveyors of lies, but as men who falsely claim to be prophets of God, is indicated also by verses 22, 23, which are part of the warning against false prophets. Here these people are quoted as saying, “Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Thy name? and in Thy name have cast out devils? and in Thy name done many wonderful works?” As genuine prophecy both in the Old and in the New Testament was often accompanied by genuine mir- acles, so false prophets have again and again tried to bolster their claim to be prophets by purported miracles (Deut. 13:1, 2; Rev. 16:13, 14). According to the strict Biblical usage of the term, therefore, not every erring teacher should at once be called a false prophet, much less erring Christians or whole churches. This is in no wise to say that there are not real false prophets in the world today. There have been such at all times. There are such today, both pretending to be inspired spokesmen for God, and claiming to perform miracles. Nor is this to say that the church dare ever relax her vigilance against every error in doctrine (1 Tim. 1: 3,4; Acts 20:28-30). But the church ought not to use this passage loosely, as though all erring Christians and perhaps whole erring churches were to be treated as false prophets, who are wolves in sheep’s clothing. This would be a serious error against the doctrine of the church, because also erring Christians are Christians, and members of the body of Christ. Gal. 1:6-9 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel; Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the Gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. Gal. 1:6-9 was written against well-known heretical teachers of apostolic times, the so-called Judaizers, who taught that Christians had to be circumcised and to keep the ceremonial law of Moses, or they could not be saved. (Cf. Acts15:1.) St.Paul very properly rec- ognized this as destroying the Gospel itself, and told those who accepted this teaching, “Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the Law; ye are fallen from grace.” (Cf. Gal. 5:4.) This passage must be applied against all teachers who, after the manner of the Judaizers, teach Christians to build their hope of salvation on the works of the Law. It is a constant warning to teachers and hearers alike against moralism, synergism, and the confusion of Law and Gospel. However, Gal. 1:6-9 must not be applied indiscrim- inately to every erring Christian or teacher, much less to whole churches in which the Gospel is preached, even though this preaching may be accompanied by doctrinal errors. It deals with teachers who overthrew the Gos- pel, the very foundation of the church’s faith. Therefore St. Paul pronounces a curse upon them, a thing which would be unthinkable, if he were dealing with erring Christians. Acts 19:8-10 And he went into the synagogue, and spake boldly for the space of three months, disputing and persuading the things concerning the kingdom of God. But when divers were hardened, and believed not, but spake evil of that way before the multitude, he departed from them, and separated the disciples, dis- puting daily in the school of one Tyrannus. And this continued by the space of two years; so that all they which dwelt in Asia heard the word of the Lord Jesus, both Jews and Greeks.