# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1965_S210 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 210 UNPUBLISHED REPORTS AND OVERTURES [4-51 Un] To Limit Administrative and Other Duties of the President of the Synod Wuereas, Any pastor, faithful to the duties of his office, realizes to his chagrin that in the milieu of the ministry as constituted in our day there is precious little time available for reaching always greater, desirable, and necessary maturity in the always more developing complexities of the theological spectrum now even placed before the eyes of the laity to its confusion in such an attractive and popular manner as done in Life magazine (Dec. 1964); and Wuereas, To a much larger degree it must be evident even to anyone not closely associated with the Presi- dency of the Synod but receiving his impressions alone through reading of the President’s activities (his neces- sary travels, the interminable prescribed meetings, the voluminous correspondence, the desirable acceptance of invitations to Synod-related and other functions, as- semblies, etc., where his presence is almost mandatory, the intersynodical confrontations, etc., etc. —all these and many more and for which, in most cases mentioned, a responsibility so great rests upon him for both his every word and action as to require a special measure of the Spirit’s unction) that, even with the eminent qualifications he brings to this high office and when these are expended to the utmost, there is not the time he himself must crave for uninterrupted study and prayer to evaluate properly his attitudes, positions, and decisions on issues daily confronting him and on which the weal or woe of the Synod may very well depend; and Wuereas, The exercising of “supervision over the doctrine taught in the Synod” is the first-mentioned among the President’s duties and hence may be pre- sumed in the eyes of the Synod to be the foremost of his responsibilities; and inasmuch as that duty, if he is to wisely and conscientiously fulfill it (as we firmly believe he does), demands more now than ever in the so complex theological situation existing among theo- logians of repute and disrepute in America and abroad a penetrating, Spirit-endowed acumen enabling a pre- cise sifting of the true from the false in the supreme interest of our Synod’s continuing orthodoxy, and hence requiring so thorough a grasp of modern foci of theology as only intensive and constant study under much prayer could achieve and for which many more hours of con- centrated application to the task would be needed than the President can make available to himself, especially with a decision-shy Commission on Theology and Church Relations offering little help; and Wuereas, It might be objected that, in the above regard, one man carries a similar burden of duties in a numerically even larger Lutheran body, it should be remembered that the organizational setup differs funda- mentally — the parent body in this instance being com- posed of synods whose respective presidents have the direct oversight and hence the responsibility in their respective areas which we impose on our lone synodical President — the very comparison serving to make even more impressive the utter impossibility of one human being doing full justice to the tasks we so blithely assign him; therefore be it Resolved, That as large.a part of the President’s ad- ministrative and other duties (and/or elements devolv- ing therefrom) as is consonant with the holding of that office be definitely committed to the office of the First Vice-President under an arrangement similar to that in force at the present in the case of the President whereby the former may also delegate some of these duties to the Second, Third or Fourth Vice-President; and be it further Resolved, That, on the order of a bishop in his dio- cese, the District Presidents be made to assume full responsibility for doctrine in their areas, distinct from any responsibility on the part of Synod’s President (except as [while deleting Art. XI, B, c] subdivision d would apply) —the latter’s responsibility otherwise, so far as supervision of doctrine is concerned, to extend only to our colleges and seminaries (where ordinarily the stamp for the whole church is set); which restriction of responsibility would lend emphasis to the present phrasing in the Bylaws: “supervision over the doctrine taught in the Synod”; and be it finally Resolved, That the Committee on Constitutional Matters frame the necessary changes in the Handbook to implement this proposal and bring such changes be- fore this convention for ratification. Circuit TWENTY SoutHern Cauirornia District Joun C. Jacossen, Counselor Rocer B. ScHaum, Secretary [4-52 Un] Appendix G to Report of Board of Directors Mass Media in Mission Survey This survey was initiated so recently that it is possi- ble now to provide only a very preliminary report. Sur- vey work was actually undertaken on April 1, 1965. In establishing the scope of the study we have de- fined the mass media to include: television; radio; the print media — newspapers, books, magazines; audiovis- ual — sound films, filmstrips, billboards, and so on. The study will concentrate on the use of these media for outreach purposes and will initially emphasize work in overseas areas. It has been possible to make limited progress in three facets of the total study, the first of which has been the definition of a preliminary research design for the sur- vey. In this connection it has been determined that any analysis of the total synodical effort must include de- tailed reference to the related activities of synodical auxiliaries, local groups, and individuals. The auxiliary agencies and all others so far contacted in the study + Sint