# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1962_S111 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 110 RESOLUTIONS — COMMITTEE 3 “2. All the Symbolical Books of the Evangelical Lu- theran Church as a true and unadulterated statement and exposition of the Word of God” (Const., Art. II). Concerning the fellowship of believers with one an- other, the Word of God teaches that they should: 1) “walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called . . . endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (Eph. 4:1,3); and | 2) “mark them which cause divisions and offenses contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned, and avoid them” (Romans 16:17); and , 3) “sanctify the Lord God in your hearts, and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason for the hope that is in you with meekness and fear.” (1 Peter 3:15) The Lutheran Confessions insist that the pure teach- ing of the Gospel and the right administration of the sac- raments are the indispensable basis for the true unity of the church (Augsburg Confession, Art. VII); and they set forth and defend the Gospel in Word and sacrament very explicitly. This confessional rigor is coupled with a will to win all men and a desire for unity which pre- serves them from confessional harshness. They pro- nounce condemnations upon false teachers; but it is not their “design and purpose to condemn these men who err from a certain simplicity of mind but are not blasphemers against the truth of the heavenly doctrine, much less, indeed, entire churches.” (Preface to the Christian Book of Concord, Triglot, p. 19) The constitution of the Lutheran Synodical Confer- ence includes the following points as the purpose of its organization (Art. IV): The purpose of the Lutheran Synodical Conference shall be: a) To give outward expression to the unity of spirit existing among the constituent synods; b) To encourage and strengthen one another in faith and confession; c) To further unity of doctrine and practice and to remove whatever might threaten to disturb this unity; d) To strive for true unity in doctrine and practice among Lutheran church bodies; e) To invite into membership with the Lutheran Syn- odical Conference such church bodies as agree with the constituent synods of the Lutheran Synodical Conference in doctrine and practice (Articles II and II); f) To cooperate in such matters of mutual interest as: ‘1. Conducting and directing domestic and foreign missions; 2. Encouraging the joint publication of a theological journal; 3. Fostering joint educational endeavors; 4. Promoting theological conclaves at regular in- tervals within the confines of the Lutheran Syn- odical Conference. In the history of our Synod certain expressions of fellowship, such as joint prayer, have sometimes been practiced and sometimes omitted in meetings with Christian bodies not yet in fellowship with it, and have thus been treated as a matter to be dealt with in Chris- tian judgment under varying circumstances. Our Synod has recognized the above in its resolution of 1944 pertaining to joint prayer: “Joint prayer at in- tersynodical conferences, asking God for His guidance and blessing upon the deliberations and discussions of His Word, does not militate against the resolution of the Fort Wayne Convention, provided such prayer does not imply denial of truth or support of error.” (Pro- ceedings, 1944, pp. 251, 252) , In meeting with other Lutheran bodies (not in fel- lowship) for the purpose of discussing doctrine, joint prayer has been practiced in the early and in the present-day history of our Synod and of ‘sister synods: 1. meeting of Missouri and Buffalo, 1867, after years of separation; 2. meeting with Michigan Synod in 1904; 3. meetings of our Doctrinal Unity Committee with the Commission of the American Lutheran Church, ac- cording to 1944 resolutions; 4. meetings in Germany between synods, now in fel- lowship with us, during their discussions prior to the establishment of church fellowship with one another; 5. meetings in Australia between our sister synod and the sister synod of the ALC. The consideration of these and_ related issues prompted our Synod in 1956 to ask the faculties of the two seminaries to restudy this question. The floor committee, after weighing the questions occasioned by The Theology of Fellowship and Me- morials 332 and 333 (pp. 163, 164), asking repudiation and rejection of The Theology of Fellowship, herewith presents the following recommendations: A Whereas, The 1956 convention of The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod requested the two theological faculties to undertake a fresh study of “fellowship, prayer fellowship, and unionism” (1956 Proceedings, p. 550); and Wuereas, The Theology of Fellowship, the result of this study, represents a conscientious effort to deal Scripturally with the question of fellowship and is a study document open to revision, clarification, or cor- rection; and Wuereas, The reaction to The Theology of Fellow- ship, Part II, by members of our Synod and by churches in fellowship with us has shown that this portion of the study is open to misunderstanding and criticism; and - Wuereas, At this juncture of our history, where new opportunities to witness to other churches are being presented to the Synod, a common understanding of fel- lowship and a common conviction concerning the prac- tice of fellowship are of critical importance; and Wuereas, A fresh approach to the study of fellow- ship has been suggested by overseas representatives and by the Synod of Evangelical Lutheran Churches and has been urged by a resolution of the Synodical Con- ference; and Wuereas, Such a fresh approach may have the effect