# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1962_S24 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 24 DOCTRINAL-DEVOTIONAL ESSAYS The Division of Interchurch Aid and Service to Refugees has helped to resettle more than 200,000 ref- ugees. This is certainly a necessary and noble work. In the Division of Ecumenical Action especially youth work has been studied. At the Ecumenical Institute at Bossy in Switzerland, Christians of all races have been exploring the meaning of the Christian Gospel for the work and witness of the church to the world. In the Division of Studies the World Council of Churches calls upon the world’s best minds to help analyze and to suggest Christian approaches to the ever-new problems confronting the Christian church, especially in the area of missions and evangelism. Finally the Commission of the Churches on International Affairs keeps the churches apprised of world problems insofar as they have relevance for the Christian faith and life. We have tried in the above to give a brief picture of the aims and of the work of the World Council of Churches, which is not the Ecumenical Movement itself but is at present the chief and certainly the largest group professing to be prosecuting ecumenical aims. A small opposition group of fundamentalists, organ- ized also at Amsterdam, also in the year 1948, in op- position to the W.C.C., the International Council of Christian Churches, is little heard from by comparison. When we speak of the Ecumenical Movement we gen- erally think of the W. C.C. and the churches associated with it. That the problems which led to the founding of the W.C.C. are real and the aims of the W.C.C. as stated are laudable we would not for one moment deny. Nor would we wish to intimate for one moment that the work of the World Council of Churches and of other ecumenical groups has beén without real benefit for these groups. When we consider that the church has not only been divided into many denominations to her own shame and to the scandalizing of the heathen but that denominations themselves have been cleft down the middle between conservatives and liberals and at times even between fundamentalists and modernists, then we can realize that for many denominations the apparently positive platform on which the churches are asked to enter into fellowship with each other, namely, the confession of Jesus Christ as God and Savior, has been a genuine blessing. This we must confess as we, a confessional church, standing squarely on the Scrip- ture and confessing the Biblical Gospel, view and eval- uate this movement. We are, however, as a confessional church also constrained to ask a number of very earnest and search- ing questions. ' The first has to do with the formal principle of the Reformation and of our Confessions, that it shall be the prophetic and apostolic Scriptures alone according to which all teachers and doctrines shall be judged. Into the Ecumenical. Movement, -as it is represented in the World Council of Churches, have gone the modern- ists from former times, perhaps reformed, perhaps not; the higher critics who in many instances have sought to destroy confidence in the Holy Scripture; and the neo-orthodox, who, while generally more conservative, are nevertheless a far cry from the attitude of our Confessions toward the Scriptures. What we must ask about earnestly is the attitude of the churches in the Ecumenical Movement toward the Scriptures. Could such a position as our Confessions take — and as we as a confessional church must take — be maintained if we plunged into the Ecumenical Movement and joined the World Council of Churches? The other question which we must earnestly ask is: What happens to the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ in the Ecumenical Movement as represented by the World Council of Churches? True, one of the avowed aims of the World Council of Churches is the proclama- tion of the Gospel in all the world without scandal flow- ing from divided churches. But what happens to the Gospel in the Ecumenical Movement? Into this move- ment have gone churches which have never had a full understanding of the Gospel. We cannot here enter into the theological depths of the question. But where the doctrine of original sin is minimized, as it is in many churches, there the Gospel cannot remain pure. Where the social gospel displaces the Biblical Gospel, there is no longer a real Gospel but a false gospel. And it is a fact that the social gos- pelers of a past generation are now part and parcel of the Ecumenical Movement. And some of the expres- sions in the documents of this movement leave one in doubt whether all the talk about the Gospel means the Gospel as set forth in the Scriptures and in the Lu- theran Confessions. Evangelicals who have studied the Ecumenical Movement and its documents have rightly chided the movement for not being definite and clear enough in their statements about the person of Christ, although it must be stated that some individuals in the Ecumen- ical Movement have spoken clearly and Biblically. We must agree with an evangelical critic of the Ecumenical Movement, J. Marcus Kik (Ecumenism and the Evan- gelical, Philadelphia: The Presbyterian and Reformed Pub. Co., 1958), who finds that the Ecumenical Move- ment “fights shy of sharply defining the Christian faith for fear of its disturbing element” (p.64). We miss in the documents of the Ecumenical Movement the clear statement of the Gospel of the incarnation of the Son of God, of His vicarious suffering and death for the sins of mankind, of the doctrine of justification by grace for Christ’s sake through faith. As a confessional church, loyal to our Lutheran Confessions, our feet firmly planted on the prophetic and apostolic Scriptures as the source of our faith and the standard of judgment and on the Holy Gospel as the very heart and core of the Scripture, we must ask the ecumenist: What happens to the Scripture in your movement? What happens to the Biblical Gospel? According to the answers to these questions we must finally judge the Ecumenical Movement and be guided in our actions with respect to it.