# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1962_S17 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) DOCTRINAL-DEVOTIONAL ESSAYS 17 A church committed to the Gospel is bound, third, to be a strong missionary church. The Gospel is en- trusted to the church not only as a precious possession but as the dynamic resource and motivation for bearing to all nations and kindreds and tribes under heaven the message concerning the God who was in Christ, recon- ciling the world unto Himself, and who has committed to the church both Word and ministry of reconciliation and compels the men of Christ to cry into the cultured and uncultured wastelands of paganism, humanism, and all non-Christian and anti-Christian philosophies: “Be ye reconciled to God.” The Lutheran Symbols certainly have this concern. They want to proclaim “the pure, unalloyed, and un- adulterated light of [God’s] holy Gospel and of the Word that alone brings salvation” (Preface, Book of Concord). The Confessors are conscious of their obliga- tion to “do everything that is useful and profitable to the increase and expansion of God’s praise and glory” and “to the propagation of that Word of His that alone brings salvation” (ibid.). Convinced as they were of the exclusive character of the Christian Gospel of justi- fication by grace for Christ’s sake through faith alone, those Lutherans could be no other than mission-minded. And neither can we if we would be faithful Lutherans. Fourth, the Lutheran Symbols give evidence throughout of the strong and definite doctrinal con- victions of the people who gave and still give expression to their faith through them. Theirs was no “perhaps” or “probably” or “maybe” theology. For their religious convictions they were prepared to suffer the loss of all things and to bear the reproach of the rest of Christen- dom for their firmness. So they say: “From our exposition friends and foes may clearly understand that we have no intention (since we have no authority to do so) to yield anything of the eternal and unchangeable truth of God for the sake of temporal peace, tranquility, and outward harmony. . . . Still less by far are we minded to whitewash or cover up any falsification of true doctrine or any publicly con- demned errors. We have a sincere delight in and deep love for true harmony and are cordially inclined and determined on our part to do everything in our power to further the same. We desire such harmony as will not violate God’s honor, that will not detract anything from the divine truth of the holy Gospel, that will not give place to the smallest error but will lead the poor sinner to true and sincere repentance, raise him up through faith, strengthen him in his new obedience, and thus justify and save him forever through the sole merit of Christ....” (F.C., S.D. XI, Concl.) Can we as a church of the Lutheran Confessions do less? We need not remain chained to the formulations of the past, but we must remain grounded in the eternal truth and continue to have firm convictions. Nothing is more unfruitful, exasperating, and destructive than the muddy double-talk of the player of theological games whom the Confessions characterize as “restless, contentious individuals, who do not want to be bound to any-certain formula of pure doctrine,” who are ready “to start scandalous controversies at will and to intro- duce and defend monstrous errors, the only possible consequence of which is that finally correct doctrine will be entirely obscured and lost and nothing beyond uncertain opinions and dubious, disputable imaginations and views will be transmitted to subsequent genera- tions.” (Preface, B. of C.) Fifth, a strong sense of history and of the unbroken continuity of the one church pervades the Symbols. Here were unabashed traditionalists, conservative in the best sense. Standing in line with the church of the apostles and the ancient councils and fathers of the church, steeped in the heritage of Christian customs and liturgies and hymnody, they were concerned about conserving all that was good and meaningful and help- ful for the promotion of the holy Gospel. Indignantly they turned back upon their accusers every charge of theological innovation. At the same time they did not hesitate to break with tradition when the purity of the Gospel was at stake. With all their reverence for the church’s past, our Ref- ormation fathers desired to be a progressive and con- temporary church, speaking intelligibly to their genera- tion. No “new” theology, yet undeniably they said many things in a way that had never before in the church’s history been said thus. If time permitted, much could be said about several other important accents in the Symbols that show what kind of church we ought to be, notably their strong emphasis on continued solid theological education, of which they say, “We desire particularly that the young men who are being trained for service in the church and for the holy ministry be faithfully and diligently instructed therein, so that the pure teaching and confes- sion of the faith may be preserved and perpetuated among our posterity through the help and assistance of the Holy Spirit until the glorious advent of our only Redeemer and Savior Jesus Christ.” (Preface, B. of C.) We could also speak of the high sense of believing, teaching, and confessing in the presence of the return- ing Christ and the final judgment, as well as the great feeling of pastoral concern and responsibility for the conscience of the individual. But surely enough has been said to indicate the basis on which a church pledged to the Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions should take stock of itself. It is my sober judgment that if our church had been more fully imbued with the theology and the spirit of the Symbols, there would not now be the wide- spread bitterness and intolerance toward fellow mem- bers on both sides of the arguments. It is very good for the church to have angry young men—or angry old men, for that matter. This helps keep us all from becoming complacent. But let us be angry about the right things and not pour our scorn and contempt on our struggling brethren and fellow pilgrims or even on the unpretentious Gospel, which has ever been the glory and power of the church. Do we have the humility and the honesty to examine ourselves? to discover and uncover the causes of our