# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1956_S562 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 562 INTERSYNODICAL AND DOCTRINAL MATTERS were in the hands of the male” (St. Louis ed., II], 64). The entrance of sin made this subordination of woman to’ man more or less burdensome, both because of her sinful nature and that of sinful man. But in itself this subordination can be, and in Christian marriage, is, woman’s glory, pride, and joy, as being God’s specific gift to her for her own happiness and the welfare of our race. 6. The violation of God’s creative order causes Paul’s shock at woman's speaking in the church (“it is disgraceful”). The church is not a sociological institution like the public schools; it is God’s temple, God’s house, with the responsibility of proclaiming God’s whole revealed will to the world, including His Order of Creation with its implications for ethics and with centrality of marriage in that Order. Without headship there can be no real marriage, and that headship belongs to man. Paul bids us see a surrender of that headship when in public services man sits at the feet of woman as his spiritual directrix, publicly guiding the church, for that is implied in her speaking. 7. Paul does not use the term “custom” in the present con- nection. He is not speaking of something that is alterable. He says with a sense of authority: “What I am writing to you is a command of the Lord” (v. 37). That covers all the principles and directives from 1 Cor. 11:2 to the end of Ch. 14. He makes a clear claim to inspiration and asserts that the test of a man’s “prophetic” stature or of a man’s “spiritual” knowledge is the acceptance of these com- mands. A church which professes to accept Scriptures as its only rule and norm of faith and practice will never have a good con- science if it fails to follow “all the churches of the saints” in the Apostolic age in the practice inculcated in the passage here dis- cussed. See II, F, 1. E. 1 Timothy 2:11-15 (Zerbst, pp. 51—56). (11) “Let a woman learn in quietness with all subjection. (12) But I permit not a woman to teach, nor to have dominion over a man, but to be in quietness. (13) For Adam was first formed, then Eve; (14) and Adam was not beguiled but the woman being beguiled hath fallen into transgression; (15) but she shall be saved through her childbearing [King James Version ‘in child-bearing’], if they continue in faith and love and sanctification with sobriety” (American Standard Version of 1902). 1. Vv. 11-13 repeat in somewhat different terms the content of 1 Cor. 14:33 b-38. See above, II, D. There is the same right ungrudgingly granted woman to “learn” — something that was not thus granted in Judaism. Cf. Zerbst, pp. 48, 55, et al. There is the same prohibition of woman’s functioning in a teaching capacity in se P: de "BEE Vi pa be id: inc lox ca Of tic or spi to ex he ex no ph fol bei thi it ; is « tat “di It.