# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1956_S241 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 240 SEMINARIES AND COLLEGES in fiscal 1959. This would provide a total of $6,750,000 in capital funds within the triennium after the St. Paul Convention. On this basis, the Board has selected projects totaling approx- imately $6,750,000, which received itemized listing in column 1 of the appended tabulation. Plan B In the further realization that this present synodical convention would have before it, for review, the decisions reached a year ago and with a view both to the short- and long-range needs of Synod and the welfare of the synodical institutions, the Board also determined to submit an alternate proposal on the assumption that this synodical convention might decide that the policy pre- ferred a year ago cannot be followed with success and may not be feasible, and that, therefore, financing of capital investments on some other basis must become the approved synodical course of action (Plan B). Plan B assumes that this synodical convention will determine that it is neither feasible nor necessary to provide for the imple- mentation of the policy of annual inclusion of established capital investment funds in the synodical budget. It likewise assumes that Synod will either instruct its Board of Directors to exercise full authority to borrow capital investment funds for future repay- ment as provided by the Houston Convention in 1953 or that Synod will determine other bases of financing its capital investment outlay for the next period of years, Under Plan B, a distinction between column one and column two in the appended tabulation is neither necessary nor useful. The recommended columnar sequence used in tabulating the request includes these categories: 1. To be completed with synodical funds within the 1957—1960 triennium. 2. To be completed with synodical funds after fiscal 1960. 3. To be completed from local funds of the institution as soon as they are available. Generally, this classification includes projects for which synodical Districts or other groups have indicated their readiness to furnish special funds. 4. Deferred for restudy and redefinition for the 1959 convention. Projects placed under this classification do not seem to be consistent with the essential functions assigned by Synod to a given institution or with anticipated general developments in the synodical system of colleges and seminaries, or they do not seem to provide the most feasible answer to a campus-planning problem. 5. To be provided from synodical funds under the regulations of the so-called “building-and-loan plan” now existing. a ne eH 6. Ta annual bi The that the The I for Highe necessary tion whic during th To in in author cation are Educatior. of capital On th recommer and three The s and the pi tions are well as in Survey ar <~ Imme symbol “I project is auxiliary - Rathe expected ] for Highex in the apr Item J for projec are likely these mor in order { more amp It is also € authorizat' budget its and in the Item 1 synodicall named abc (