# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1953_S1050 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) dition, he stated 308 PARISH EDUCATION Since the teacher’s offic e, next to that of the most mubortant office in the church, a person should th fe) ce if he stepped into the pastorate itself, or if h Mm nly leave gregation. In proof of this claim, he cited 1 Cor 12: counted the teachers among the “helps.” For this r ; : at the teacher had a divine office and that he we ne as. in this office so long as it pleased God. * was to Stay A view that the teacher w i: ; as not i the seaplie servant of the Word. —An antic a Pa € schutolatt of 1897 also di ” contended that the teacher Was 1 not i ents office inistry, bug peckhard in » Speckhard pecause 3 Christian congregation from the time of its organizati , s the farramt in the abstract, since it has God's c en an S ee the pastorate according to divine regulation ° ato peckhard maintained that ; one cannot speak of , office in the abstract because it does not exist in the conan’ ion him accordingly. . He emphasized that the teach 2 s er’ i i | Is seriously harmed by the congre fon ye wae eh gation, among other ‘ways, when ; the second con- » could never be met c : them to a different calling as their real bi God had directed Pastorate, Was : PARISH EDUCATION 509 “emphasized further that the teacher’s office, as it exists us, is seriously harmed by the teacher himself when he be- dolent because he has a lifelong call, when he does not Hy continue in his studies, when he does not stay within the ies of his position and wants to be looked upon as a kind Hitional pastor in the congregation, and when he does not live mes a servant of the Word.38 : i complaint that teachers were charged special dues without itted to vote. — In 1899 it was reported that some teach- complained about being expected to contribute two dollars for Synod’s administrative expenses, for which they also 4yed the synodical reports free. The complaint urged that this t¢-:bution had been imposed on a minority which had no vote. 4d refused to entertain the validity of the claim and pointed ‘put that the contribution was demanded by Synod’s Constitution, ‘adt by majority vote.% 4 The teacher’s office as a branch of the pastorate.—In 1907 there appeared in Lehre und Wehre an article on the teacher's office written by L. Dornseif. Dornseif emphasized that the office ~ of the teacher was one that was branched off from the pastorate and was a part of the pastorate. He stated that the office of the teacher was an auxiliary office to the public ministry and that teachers were public servants of the Word. He argued that inas~ much as the congregation utilized the priesthood of all believers to create a special position and to call another besides the pastor to teach the children God’s Word and to give them Christian trairi- ing, the congregation therefore created a branch office or an auxiliary office to the public ministry. The incumbent of this office discharges a part of the public ministry in that he publicly teaches the children God’s Word and seeks to give them Christian training. Through the call of the congregation to this office and through the discharge of the duties involved in it, the teacher becomes a public servant of the Word. . Dornseif emphasized that the teacher’s office is a divine office, not in the sense that God has established it in exactly this form, but because the office is a part and a branch of the public ministry, which God did found and ordain, and because God calls the in- cumbent through the congregation. The teachers who have been called by the congregation are in a divine calling; they are called by God, because they are co-workers with the pastors in Word and 88 H. S d, “Thesen, den Beruf der Gemeindeschullehrer un- serer Synode und die Anstellung von Lehrerinnen innerhalb derselben betreffend.” Schulblatt, XXXII (Nov., 1897), pp. 330—32. 89 Proceedings, Mo. Synod, XXIV (1899), pp. 127—29. Cnn ne nn nance nn nccneenncnc ee EE EE EEE EE PEN ES