# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1992_S51 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT . 51 ing projects to assist independent Lutheran. congregations in Russia, primarily German-speaking. Associate Lu- theran Hour Speaker Wallace Schulz has given personal leadership to these efforts. More recently, the Board for Mission Services has appointed Dr. Thomas Sluberski to serve in the St. Petersburg area, and additional English language teachers have been provided. Much of the work we are attempting to do in Eastern Europe is not what we have typically understood as “mission work.” We have not focused on starting new Lutheran congregations but have attempted to support established Lutheran churches with . whom we do not enjoy an official fellowship relationship at the present time. However, I am pleased to report that all of our contacts to date, particularly with the Lutheran Church in Czechoslovakia and its Bishop, Pavel Uhorskai, have been most graciously received and blessed by the Lord. I feel very hopeful about the future of these efforts. Church Relations ' According to the synodical Constitution and Bylaws, the synodical President is primarily responsible for contacts and relationships with other church bodies, many of which are described in tbe report of the Commission on Theology and Church Relations. This includes partner churches around the world, other Lutheran churches, inter-Chris- tian dialogs and contacts, ecumenical organizations, and the like. Because of the considerable correspondence, travel, and meetings entailed in these far-flung relationships, the President's office in 1988 developed a “Church Relations Department’ within the structure of the office. Its steering committee consists of the President, First Vice-President, and the executive directors of the Board for Mission Ser- vices and the Commission on Theology and Church Rela- tions. This administrative arrangement, which is currently operating without direct staff services, has been of great value in coordinating the various church-relations contacts of the synodical boards, educational institutions, and Dis- tricts, as the Synod remains in continuing contact with more than 35 partner churches and.other Christian groups worldwide. . ' There have been relatively few official contacts with the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod and the Evangel- ical Lutheran Synod during the past triennium, but a num; ber of informal contacts, as well as meetings involving synodical staff persons, have continued to bring evidence of cordial and friendly relationships. However cordial such contacts have been, it remains a disappointment to me that these two church bodies have demonstrated very little in! terest in responding to our standing invitation to meet at any time to discuss our long-standing differences as well as the possibilities of closer relationships. Both of these church bodies have been invited to bring greetings to our convention. Dealing with other autonomous church bodies requires not only doctrinal integrity but a special sensitivity and fraternal collegiality, particularly with smaller third-world churches, who remember only too well the days of pater, nalism and colonialism. The LCMS has assigned such church relations responsibilities to the synodical President (cf., Bylaw 3.101, f and g). This responsibility could easily. engage a small staff of full-time LCMS “ambassadors,” something we obviously cannot afford. Accordingly, key BFMS staff help by carrying out such ambassadorial, church relations duties, in addition to their many admin- istrative tasks. Confessional and mission ties remain very strong with our newest partrier church, the Lutheran Church—Can- ada, which began its autonomous existence on Jan. 1, 1989. Regular meetings are held between the officers and staffs of the two church bodies to maintain the highest possible level of solidarity and cooperation. Annual meetings are also held with the leadership of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. This “Com- mittee on Lutheran Cooperation” monitors the work the two church bodies do together in Lutheran World Retief, Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services, and various other inter-Lutheran agencies. Theological differences, which keep the two churches from enjoying altar and pul- pit fellowship, have also been addressed during this past triennium. With the aid of a generous grant, the Bishops and Presidents of the two church .bodies, together with their counterparts in Canada, held a conference in 1990 to discuss common problems faced by the two church bodies in strengthening and supporting the pastoral office, and, in informal small groups, to understand better what steps need to be taken to improve relationships between the church bodies. Contrary to some reports that have circu- lated in the Synod, the devotional exercises at this con- ference faithfully observed synodical principles. Another such meeting is planned for the fall of 1992. . On a worldwide basis, we have had only marginal con- tacts with the Lutheran World Federation during the past triennium. These contacts have consisted primarily in vis- its between key staff persons, correspondence, and occa- sional telephone conversations. The Lutheran World Federation continues to emphasize its self-understanding as a “communion” of churches in full fellowship with each other—an understanding that is contrary to our theolog- ical position. In the meantime, in contacts with our sister church in Australia, the LWF has made it clear that it is now open to a kind of “associate membership” with that church body that will not entail automatic altar and pulpit fellowship. Although the Synod has been in conversations with leadership of the Lutheran Church of Australia, as well as the Lutheran Church—Canada, about the LCA’s interest in such associate membership, synodical leaders have expressed no interest in pursuing that possibility. Conversations have also taken place during the trien- nium with representatives of the American Association of Lutheran Churches, a group of congregations that chose not to join the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America but to form its own church body. Several of these conver- . Sations have focused on our common opposition to abortion on demand. Considerations are also underway concerning the pos- sibility of mutual partner church recognition with our sis- ter church in Paraguay. If at all possible, a rec- ommendation to that end will be forthcoming at the con- vention itself. During this triennium, the Commission on Theology