# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1989_S67 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT 67 Part Il ~ Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ, J am honored and delighted to welcome all of you—the delegates, advisors, representatives, and friends of The Lu- theran Church—Missouri Synod who are here to transact the business of our beloved Synod in this 57th regular convention. The Constitution of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod requires the President to “give an accurate report to the Synod of his administration at all sessions of the Synod.” In keeping with that constitutional requirement, Iam pleased to call your attention to two parts of my report that have already been shared with you in writing. Part 1 is in the Convention Workbook, pp. 1-6. In that portion of the report, I have sought to call to the delegates’ attention some of the major areas of activity that have engaged the President, Vice Presidents, officers, and staffs of the Synod during the last three years. The second part of the President’s convention report was given at the meeting of the Floor Committees in St. Louis on May 19, 1989. That report is found in Today’s Business, pp. 24-28. You are wonderful delegates if you have read all of the pages that have been sent to you in the official mailings of the convention, including those from my office. Words, words, words—it sometimes seems that we're going to strain and crack under the burden of so many words! It isn’t only the reports of the President and others in the Workbook that you’ve had to work your way through! In the last two weeks you have also received a tremendous amount of mail from various parts of the Synod. Much of this has contained misleading information. Some of that was no doubt unintentional, inasmuch as we many times see things from different perspectives or don’t have access to all of the facts and the figures. Although I have avoided mailing anything to the delegates of this convention that would appear to be arguing for the programs of this ad- ministration or defending it against criticisms, I came to realize in the last few days that much of what was sent to you affects not only the President of the Synod but the lives, careers, and activities of many others who serve in the administration of the Synod. I have therefore prepared some corrective information and asked the District Pres- idents to share it with the delegates yesterday. If you were not able to be present in the caucuses of your respective Districts, perhaps you did not receive that handout. In that case, I invite you to see your District President to receive what I have written by way of response to some of the misinformation that was sent to you. If the District Pres- idents no longer have copies, you can get copies from the President’s staff. A number of the items treated in that document do not pertain directly to the President’s office. Those of you who are familiar with the structure and Constitution of the Synod know that the Board of Directors has the primary responsibility for the fiscal and legal management of the Synod’s affairs; some of the mail you have received deals with that general area. You should know that the Board of Directors, like me and other administrators of the church, take these questions and concerns very seriously. Yesterday, for example, the Board of Directors took the initiative and arranged for conversations with some of those who had expressed criticisms. Perhaps at some point early in the convention the board can share some of its thoughts on that with you. I wish you well as you do your job as a delegate. As I mentioned to some of you in the orientation meetings yes- terday, for the next week you are the leaders of The Lu- theran Church—Missouri Synod. This leadership role will continue throughout the next three years according to our Bylaws, as you go back home and share what you did here. Not only do I wish you well, but even more I pray for the blessings of the Lord of the church as He leads and guides you to make decisions on behalf of us all. Responsibilities of the President As the delegates review the reports of the President in part 1 and part 2 (and we're going to do that together for a few moments in order to highlight certain areas), I be- lieve it’s also important to remind you of the responsibil- ities which the Synod in its Constitution lays upon the office of the President. I quote from Article XI: “The Pres- ident has the supervision regarding the doctrine and the administration of all officers of the Synod, all such as are employed by the Synod, the individual Districts of the Synod, [and] all District Presidents.” According to the Constitution of the Synod, the Presi- dent must “see to it that all the aforementioned act in accordance with the Synod’s Constitution. “What power does he have to do this? Please read it carefully: he has the power to “advise, admonish, and reprove.” The Con- stitution says: “He shall conscientiously use all means at his command to promote and maintain unity of doctrine and practice in all the Districts of the Synod,” and he shall “see to it that the resolutions of the Synod are carried out.” As many of you know, the Bylaws of the Synod spell out those responsibilities in greater detail. Please understand that these important responsibilities of the President were not placed in the constitution or Bylaws in just the last few years but have been a part of our way of life since the Constitution of the Synod was first adopted. But nothing in the Constitution and Bylaws of the Synod suggests that this office is an authoritarian, dic- tatorial, or hierarchical office. It simply is not. Its incum- bents have understood that its responsibilities and accountabilities far exceed the actual authority the Synod has placed into the office. In my judgment, that’s the way it ought to be—even though it can be quite frustrating at times. Why do I say that? Because the presidency of our church body is a spiritual office. It is a ministry, a pastoral office. To be sure, it’s a specialized ministry. People are in a different relationship to the President than they are to their own spiritual leader and pastor in their congrega- tions, but much of it—like the call to service—is the same. We nominate people for consideration. We ask the Spirit’s guidance on our voting, and we truly believe that God has given us someone in this office to exercise a pastorate, a