# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_1983_S97 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS 97 In addition to the above persons, the following members served on the SCC during the past biennium: Dr. V. Jean Garton (secretary), Dr. Richard Bardolph (CTCR liaison), Dr. Eugene Gruell. Dr. Frederick Hofmeister. and Dr. Gilbert Meilaender. Dr. Meilaender was elected chairman of the SCC following the resignation of Dr. Linse. Staff services to the _ committee are provided by Dr. Samuel Nafzger and Rev. Jerald Joersz. Due to the numerous changes in personnel and to continued budgetary constraints, the SCC at the time of this report has met only four times during the past biennium. One more meeting is planned before the 1983 convention of the Synod. The report on “Human Sexuality: A Theological Perspec- tive” prepared by the SCC was adopted by the CTCR in April 1981 and distributed to all pastors. teachers. and congre- gations of the Synod in the fall of 1981. An excerpted version of this report was printed in the February 1982 issue of the Lutheran Witness. TheSCC has been informed that this report has received a number of favorable reviews and that numerous requests for copies have been received from pastors and members in other Lutheran synods in the United States and overseas (e.g.. the Lutheran Church of Australia). The SCC has presently given high priority to the completion of anew report on abortion. In the preparation of this document the committee has been monitoring with increasing concern legal, medical. and societal developments since the fateful 1973 decision of the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade. It views with considerable urgency the publication of an updated sequel to its 1971 report “Abortion: Theological. Legal. and Medical Aspects” in order to provide guidance to Christians as they bear witness to God's will in this area. Within recent months the SCC has received two new assignments which have been forwarded to it by the CTCR. The CTCR and its Social Concerns Committee have been requested by the executive secretary of the Board for Social Ministry Services to prepare a study on “The Theology of Social Ministry.” which will provide the theological foundation out of which the Synod’s social ministry program activities should arise. President Bohlmann forwarded to the CTCR and its SCC a request to review existing documents, position papers, and other materials prepared in the Synod on the issue of church-state relations and requested a summary of this review. President Bohlmann indicated that he had received a request from I.CUSA that its member bodies review their documents related to civil disobedience and provide a report on any necessary steps they might be taking to assure their adequacy in the present context. Moreover, he indicated that the Svnod’s Board of Directors has asked that in view of recent discussions on such issues as tuition tax credits, prayer in public schools. the peace question, etc., a committee look into the broader question of church-state relationships. The SCC is at the present time completing work on a basic study paper on “Christian Counseling,” which evaluates from a theological perspective the various presuppositions which underlie some well-known methods of counseling. The staff of the CTCR and members of the SCC continue to be involved in activities related to the SCC’s responsibility to carry out studies of various contemporary issues of social concern. Dr. Nafzger and Dr. Hofmeister have been partici- pating in a special study project carried out under the auspices of the Division of Theological Studies of LCUSA on the matter of in vitro fertilization. The SCC has received regular reports on this consultation. The committee has continued to receive reports regarding the activities of Lutherans for Life. including the first annual convention of this organization, held in Milwaukee. Dec. 12— 13, 1982. Dr. Garton and Rev. Joersz made presentations at this convention. Dr. Garton is president of LFL. and until recently Dr. Linse has been its executive director. This inter-Lutheran group was founded in 1978 to provide a common witness for all Lutherans concerned about fostering an increased reverence for life as a sacred gift from God. The SCC is pleased to report that during the past biennium. CTCR staff has had an opportunity to serve on a special committee appointed to prepare materials for Respect Life Sunday, held on the third Sunday in January. Appendix 3-01B Report of ALC/LCMS Coordinating Committee The 1981 synodical convention, noting that both the ALC and the LCMS recognize the existence of doctrinal differences between them, voted to bring to an end the altar and pulpit fellowship relationship which had originally been declared with the American Lutheran Church in 1969 (cf. 1981 Res. 3-01). In taking this action, the Synod made no provision to continue the Commission on Fellowship, which had served as the forum for official discussions between the ALC and the LCMS from 1969 until 1981. Through their presidents both the ALC and the LCMS indicated their desire to continue to hold discussions with each other. The LCMS resolution on altar and pulpit fellowship with the ALC concluded by resolving, “That the LCMS herewith commit itself to pursue doctrinal discussions with the ALC with the prayer that the Lord of the church will send His Holy Spirit to guide and bless these discussions.” Although the ALC Church Council had invited the LCMS immediately prior to the LCMS convention to join in ‘widespread regional and local consultations” which should “precede any action to terminate fellowship between our churches” (1981 Proceedings, p. 81), ALC President David Preus told the LCMS convention dele- gates shortly after the adoption of Resolution 3-01 that he was “confident the ALC will say yes to such discussions” (1981 Proceedings. p. 119). In keeping with these provisions, therefore, Presidents Bohlmann and Preus arranged for contacts between ALC and LCMS representatives. Meeting in Minneapolis in October 1981 and in St. Louis in January 1982, three representatives from each church body prepared and accepted the following statement as a guide for discussions between the ALC and the LCMS: A Working Statement on ALC/LCMS Discussions I. The purpose of discussions between the ALC and LCMS is to sustain and nurture ongoing relationships between the church bodies in the hope that these relationships can be deepened and strengthened. II. A committee, the ALC LCMS Coordinating Committee, has been established. A. The committee will be composed of three persons from each church body: the general president, the chairman of the Council of District Presidents, and an associate of the general president or one other person designated by the president. B. The committee will normally meet twice each year, once in Minneapolis and once in St. Louis. Cc. rhe purpose of the committee will be: . To give consideration to those questions which are of mutual concern and of importance to the relationship between the church bodies: 2. To nurture the relationship between the church bod- ies: 3. To isolate, define. and address those issues which may enhance a growing relationship between the church bodies: and 4. To coordinate and evaluate discussions and initia- tives on all levels. III. Regional local pilot discussions will be initiated. A. Regional. local pilot discussions are to be developed in at least two areas. B. They are to be planned in ways which are most helpful and appropriate to the regional, local settings. C. Two members of the ALC: LCMS Coordinating Com- mittee will serve as liaison with and provide assistance to the regional local areas in the planning of the discussions. D. There are two possible foci for the discussions: 1. One focus could be on fellowship, possibly using the LCMS Guidelines, as presented to the 1981 Convention of the LCMS, as a basis for mutual discussion. 2. Asecond focus could be on mission. This focus would consider those things that should be done together to enhance the common witness of the church bodies. IV. The Division of Theological Studies of the Lutheran Coun- cilin the U.S.A. was reaffirmed as the primary locus forthe