# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1950_S1332 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 864 MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS Your Committee desires to inform the convention that Reso- lution 13 was presented in good faith in the conviction that this procedure protected the best interests of the brother involyeg. Contrary to the promise which he had made that he would rest his case in the hands of the committee to be appointed by the President, Mr. Edward Zepp personally released the information contained in this morning’s. papers. Your Committee and the Department of Public Relations of Synod are not responsible for this action and consider it very untimely and unfortunate both for Synod and for the appellant. The Committee on Church Architecture | (Unprinted Memorial 53) During the years of the depression and the war there was little building activity throughout Synod. During the past two or three years, in spite of inflationary costs, many church buildings and schools have been built by our congregations. This, of course, has meant that a vast number of letters has been received and an- swered. Many congregations are of the opinion that the work of an architectural committee is to provide our congregations with drawings, either free of charge or at a nominal cost. They are not aware that practically every State has passed laws making it mandatory to employ an architect who has been granted a State license to practice and has satisfied the State Examining Board of his professional training and experience. This fact has been men- tioned before, but since the question comes up again and again, attention should be called once more to the existence of such State laws. They appear on the statute books not to impose a hardship upon our congregations, but they are in the interest of public . health and safety. Dug to the fact that very few architects nowadays specialize in church design, the great majority of our congregations are obliged to employ men who have never designed a church before and whose professional training has been limited to residential and business structures. In such cases many congregations have sent their drawings to one or the other of your Committee for suggestions and possible suggested revisions. Such drawings are checked not only in regard to design, but particularly in regard to structural safety and possible violations of existing safety codes. In cases of this kind no charge has been made, but it is important that preliminary drawings and not finished working drawings be ' submitted, for preliminary drawings permit ready revision, while changes in final dimensioned drawings are much more difficult to make and are usually costly to the congregation.