# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1950_S1194 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 684 INTERSYNODICAL AND DOCTRINAL MATTERS only Savior from sin through His sacrificial death on the Cr, and His resurrection on Easter morn. These forces in other synods, together with the Missouri Synod, will lend great strength toward the revitalization of Biblical truth in America and in the world. In view of this, I cannot agree with the majority report that our great Missouri Synod would serve only as an “irritant” in the National Lutheran Council. It is my conviction that testimon: to the truth, by whomsoever given, will be used for good by the Spirit of God when given to fellow Christians. I hold in high esteem all persons who appeared before the Committee. The ultimate decision, however, depends upon the 1,500,000 souls who constitute our Church. The majority report states: “It is the considered opinion of your Committee that the constitution per se of the National Lutheran Council contains nothing which would make it a sin for the Missouri Synod to sign.” T agree. Then surely the opportunity of our co-operating with the National Lutheran Council should be embraced. Our conference with Dr. Sodt, President of the National Lu- theran Council, and Dr. Empie, Executive Director of the National Lutheran Council, was reassuring. These men warmly welcomed us to join and assured us that we could participate in any depart- ment or phase of work and also that we would have the privilege of non-participation whenever it seemed to be desirable or indicated. Both men showed a warm, evangelical attitude, and I appre- ciated their sincerity and honesty. Finally, I should like also to call attention to the urgency that presents itself to Christians who have the responsibility of living and working in these challenging days. It is hardly necessary to discuss the threatening disaster to the world unless men can be brought to a realization that only through an acceptance of Christ as their Savior and God as their Guide can we hope for peace in the hearts of men. Only the intensive, active evangelical ministry of the Church can and will be effective. If by a greater degree of co-operation among the Lutheran Church bodies of America it can be made more effective, it should be done. It is for these reasons that I would recommend to Synod that it affiliate with the National Lutheran Council. W. C. Dickmerver _Nore.—On January 5, 1950, all members of the Commi invited to attend a mee’ of the Committee of Thirty-four, at which - the status of the Natio Lutheran Council in the framework of a pro d federation was discussed. However, all proposals for a Lutheran eration, of which the National Lutheran Council would become the core, are in such a tentative and uncertain state of development that they not a e presen e affect al i i majority pe the sabeene eo bove findings of either the INTERSYNODICAL AND DOCTRINAL MATTERS 685 Membership in National Lutheran Council: (Memorial 654) “In the regular quarterly meeting of this congregation, held the “evening of March 6, it was resolved that we petition Synod to join “the National Lutheran Council. We were moved to this resolve because 1. We can find nothing in the constitution of the National Lu- theran Council that would make our working together with that body a unionistic effort, since that constitution guaran- tees us freedom of choice in the areas of co-operation. 2. There are many areas of co-operation in which we have worked together in the past and are working together today, areas which do not demand unity of doctrine, areas which have responded with signal blessings to our combined ef- - forts. Such areas include the work of the Armed Services" Commission, Emergency Planning Council, Prisoner of War Board, Public Relations Department, etc. 3. The problems of, and the opportunities in, the present world will undoubtedly multiply the areas where co-operation will be the best and God-pleasing solution and answer. 4, Our witnessing for Christ by word and deed in and through the National Lutheran Council can only redound to the - glory of God and the welfare of His Church. To permit fear of man’s opinion or of man’s taking offense at actions which do not condone error or deny truth to keep us from working together as Lutherans is unworthy of a Church which be- lieves in the power of the Gospel and the blessings of Almighty God. TRINITY LutTHERAN Cxurca, Gary, Inn. Apotra M. Bacumann, Secretary JoHN F. Axsert, Chairman Affiliate with National Lutheran Council (Memorial 655) The Evangelical Lutheran Church of St. Luke, Chicago, IIL, in regular meeting assembled on March 16, 1950, after prayerful and lengthy consideration decided to forward the following resolution _to the convention of our beloved Synod: N. L. C. Membership “Wuerzas, In the history of the Church, zeal for the truth repeatedly has led to a perfectionism and purism which has ended in the development of conventicles and sects, against which the Church has had to guard itself; and