# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1950_S844 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) ’ SEMINARIES AND COLLEGES 147 a. Assumptions which are the same in the first and in the second forecasts: 1) That the Holy Ghost is the one and the only cause of communicant membership, that there is no other con- tributing cause whatever, and that He works through the Word and the Sacraments. 2) That the Word will be preached in the Missouri Synod in North America with about the same vigor and zeal from 1950 to 1980 as it was during the past three decades. 3) That the population in the United States will con- tinue to increase, but at a declining rate of increase. 4) That the congregations and Districts in North America will in the future be both willing and able to absorb the number of pastors necessary to achieve some de- sirable ratio of communicants per pastor. b. Assumptions which are not the same in both forecasts: First Forecast 4 4) That there will not be enough persons in the United States from 1950 to 1980 to enable our Synod to maintain the rate of growth which it en- joyed in the past two to three decades. That the rate of growth’ in the Missouri Synod will de- cline from 1950 to 1980, but not as rapidly as the decline in the rate of growth of pop- ulation. 1) 2) Second Forecast That there will be enough persons in the United States from 1950 to 1980 to enable our Synod to maintain the rate of growth which it en- joyed in the past two to three decades. That the rate of growth of the Missouri Synod need not at all decline from 1950 to 1980; but that it can and should remain the same as it was in the past two to three decades. That an average ratio of 250 3) That an average ratio of 315 communicants per pastor is communicants per pastor ultimately desirable. (the approximate current That the Holy Ghost will operate under significantly different conditions from 1950 to 1980. 4) ratio) should be maintained. That the Holy Ghost will operate under substantially _the same conditions from 1950 to 1980. 4 It is these differing assumptions which largely explain the dif- F fering outcomes of the two forecasts.