# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1950_S840 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) SEMINARIES AND COLLEGES 143 educational institutions an opportunity to more accurately estimate the professional capacities of those who apply for training, and would lend increased validity to any pro- fessional or vocational aptitude predictability tests which may be used (and are now being used). ~ When all or any of these outcomes are achieved, we believe that . we shall have materially improved our Church’s capacity to teach the full counsel of God effectively in the period which lies im- mediately ahead. That is the real and the ultimate motivation for every phase of the proposed reorganization. It should be the basic criterion in any appraisal of the entire plan and of the individual proposals. ‘ The Primary Question The comprehensive study which follows reflects your Board’s response to Synod’s resolution to “establish a senior college as an additional unit in the professional training of ministerial students” and to the directive that the Board “continue its study to determine a satisfactory location for the senior college as well as its organization, curriculum, and plant requirements” and submit these preliminary plans together with its recommendations to the synodical convention of 1950. Having accepted this mandate to raise the standards of minis- terial training, the Board’s extensive and prayerful exploration of the problem led to the firm conviction that Synod is faced at this time with an equally compelling problem in the production of ministers and teachers if she is to do no more than to continue her work under the same measure of blessing which has rested upon it during the past 25 years. Note well, that the Board does not even take into account the possibility of greater blessings, but speaks only of a continuation of the rate of growth which has been Synod’s actual experience during the past 25 years. In addition to the mandate which calls for higher quality standards through the establishment of a senior college, your Board is forced to recognize also that a primary consideration in every reorganization recommendation must be the realization that Synod will urgently require a sharp increase in the production of ministerial and teacher training candidates if she is to be able to carry forward her work between 1960 and 1980. Basic to this conviction are the synodical growth and future need studies which follow in Sections II and HI of this report. If the fundamental conclusion (not the actual numerical outcomes) illustrated by these statistics is rejected, then it is not necessary to consider the internal reorganization proposed. In that case we