# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1983_S77 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) grateful to the many fine people of the Synod for their graciousness and kindness toward me, and especially or the encouragement provided by their commitment to fhe Lord and His church. 3. Government Contacts. I have also been involved jn a number of contacts with national governmental eaders, particularly when matters of interest and goncern to the Synod have been involved, such as pro-life uestions, tax matters, chaplaincy programs, the wel- fare of church workers serving abroad, or human rights dimensions of national and international events. These ontacts have included briefings from state department fficials, meetings with national military leaders, and various visits with Lutheran Congressmen, Cabinet fficers, White House staff persons, and, on two occa- ions, the President of the United States. Government Jeaders have not only expressed sincere appreciation for he. people and programs of the Synod, but have been ery helpful in dealing with a number of problems including the recent detention of two of our Lutheran yorkers in E] Salvador. Inasmuch as the Synod does ot participate in the Washington-based LCUSA Office yf Governmental Affairs, such contacts have been articularly valuable. 4. Council of Presidents. The Council of Presidents (consisting of our District Presidents together with the odical President and Vice-Presidents) has continued provide excellent leadership, counsel, and support, t:only for those who are privileged to be its members, Sut for the Synod itself and its many fine programs. ‘Ably chaired until 1982 by Dr. Wilbert Griesse, and ce then by Dr. August Mennicke, the council has ntributed much to the confession, solidarity, and ission of the Synod during the past biennium and has rovided invaluable advice and support in the conduct if the synodical Presidency. 5. Presidential Appointments. In keeping with nodical Bylaws, a number of appointments were de to fill vacancies on synodical boards, commis- fons, and committees. Their names were published in he Reporter and are included in the list of board and mittee members in The Lutheran Annual. In addi- , a number of special committees were called for by 981 synodical convention, as follows: 0 study the franchise (2-14). See Report 5-05, CW, “pp. 2183—215. ‘T'o rewrite adjudication procedures (2-23). See Report 25-04, CW, pp. 200—213. sTo hold discussions with the ALC (3-10). See Report : 3-01B, CW, pp. 97—98. o:hold discussions with Valparaiso University (4- 18). See Appendix A below. To expand continuing education committee (6-25A). _ See Report 6-01, CW, p. 241. o plan Luther quincentennial celebration (9-03). See Appendix B below. 8--Dual Memberships. When Resolution 5-20 (To Mdve: Those Holding Dual Membership from the 's of the Synod) was passed at the 1981 synodical PRESIDENT’S REPORT 77 convention, there were 9 congregations, 32 active pastors, 28 retired pastors, and 11 teachers claiming dual membership in the Synod and the Association of Evangelical Lutheran Churches. Through the patient efforts of our District Presidents and the encouragement of Vice-President Sauer, those numbers today stand at 3 congregations, 7 active pastors, 20 retired pastors, and 0 teachers. In keeping with the provisions of Res. 5-20, extensions have been granted when warranted by pastoral considerations or unusual circumstances. It is hoped, however, that the remaining dual memberships will be resolved in the very near future. 7. Theological Issues. Some of the President’s involvement in theological matters is indicated in the CTCR report (CW, pp. 89 ff.). The President’s office also monitors the involvement of the Synod’s theologians as they engage in various studies under way in the Division of Theological Studies of LCUSA (see C'W, pp. 307—308), including the implications of historical criticism as requested by our 1981 synodical convention (Resolution 3-20). In addition I have addressed various theological issues in numerous conferences and gatherings, in several articles in the Lutheran Witness and elsewhere, and in consultations with District Presidents as they deal with various problems. Considerable effort was spent in attempting to resolve issues that had arisen in recent years concerning Dr. Walter A. Maier’s teaching of the doctrine of justification (see Appendix C below for my public report); this rather complex matter is current- ly receiving careful attention from the leadership of our Fort Wayne seminary, and we pray God’s blessings on those efforts. In general, the theological health of the Synod appears to be very sound, for which we praise our gracious God. 8. Unionistic Services. During the past biennium, nearly 60 instances of alleged unionistic worship services were reported in 16 Districts of the Synod. All cases were referred to the respective District Presidents to determine the facts and, whenever warranted, to minister to the involved pastors and/or congregations. Several alleged instances proved to be based on inaccu- rate accounts, but all others have been or are being dealt with. Considerable study and continued effort is needed within the Synod on this issue. 9. Church Relations Matters. Considerable time and effort were expended during the past biennium on the Synod’s relationships with other Christians. In addition to the activities detailed in the CTCR report (see CW, pp. 92 ff.), several related matters should be noted briefly. In November 1981 I visited the offices of the Ecumenical Institute in Strasbourg and the Lutheran World Federa- tion in Geneva. In September 1982 official greetings were brought to the conventions of the AELC, LCA, and The ALC as those bodies voted to form a new Lutheran church body by Jan. 1, 1988. Later that month, Iissued a proposal to the presidents of other American Lutheran church bodies to form a new inter-Lutheran agency to replace the Lutheran Council in the U.S.A. as soon as possible (attached as Appendix D). That proposal received considerable attention and resulted in an