# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_1981_S158 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 158 THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS opinion of the commission that since they are set forth in Martin Luther’s Small Catechism it is necessary that they appear in any translation of it. The Small Catechism by Martin Luther in Contemporary English THE SECOND ARTICLE And in Jesus Christ. His only Son. our Lord: who was conceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Marv: suffered under Pontius Pilate. was crucified, dead, and buried: He descended into hell: the third day He rose again from the dead: He ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty: from thence He shall come to judge the quick and the dead. The 1943 Intersynodical Catechism THE SECOND ARTICLE Redemption And in Jesus Christ, His only Son. our Lord. who was conceived by the Holy Ghost. born of the Virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, dead, and buried: He descended into hell; the third day He rose again from the dead: He ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty: from thence He shall come to judge the quick and the dead. The Small Catechism by Martin Luther in Contemporary English PART FIVE The Sacrament of Holy Communion 1 Whatis Holy Communion? Holy Communion is the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ given with bread and wine. instituted by Christ Himself for us to eat and drink. The 1943 Intersynodical Catechism THE SACRAMENT OF THE ALTAR As the Head of the Family Should Teach It in a Simple Way to His Household What is the Sacrament of the Altar? It is the true body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ under the bread and wine, for us Christians to eat and to drink, instituted by Chnist Himself. B. Evaluation of Effectiveness Training for Lutherans In response to 1979 Res. 4-22* requesting the CTCR to prepare a ‘doctrinal review of the theological philosophy” of the Effectiveness Training for Lutherans program, the CTCR presents the following: Effectiveness Training for Lutherans, as the original resolu- tion before the Synod indicates, is ‘‘a project of the Board of Parish Education.” Since the “theological philosophy” of the Board of Parish Education is that of the Synod, the CTCR does not believe that the thrust of the resolution to refer in any way wanted to call into question the theological philosophy of the Board of Parish Education. We assume that the decision to refer was occasioned by concern over statements and tenets of the parent program, ‘Parent Effectiveness Training,” and particularly statements and tenets found in a book with that title by Dr. Thomas Gordon. What is Parent Effectiveness Training? It is described by Dr. Gordon as “the tested new way to raise responsible children.” It has many wholesome and useful techniques, including active listening, “I” messages, the so-called ‘‘no lose method” of training children, etc. These techniques, while not new, can be used in a very helpful way when placed into the setting of sound Christian doctrine. However, the book in question also expresses positions regarding authority, parental training, and morality which contradict basic Scriptural principles for raising responsible children who live in grace and stand under God's message of Law and Gospel. In adapting the Parent Effectiveness Training Program for Lutherans in the form of Effectiveness Training for Lutherans, the Board of Parish Education has made available a very helpful volume, titled You Can Have a Family Where Every- body Wins, authored by Dr. Earl Gaulke. This volume approaches the whole area of parent-child relationships from a Christian perspective and makes use of Scripture as the final authority in determining those relationships. In view of the fact that certain elements of the parent program are in effect inimical to the Christian faith, the CTCR believes that the BPE, in future implementation of the ETL program, should alert all those participating in the project to the theological aberrations of the parent program. *WHEREAS, The Synod has supported the ETL program as a project of the Board of Parish Education: and WHEREAS, Though this has been accomplished with the generous support of Aid Association for Lutherans in the amount of $492,000 granted through December 1979, this direct funding will not be available in 1980: therefore be it Resolved. That the Synod in convention thank the Aid Associa- tion for Lutherans for their generous support, enabling this project to have a very successful beginning; and be it further Resolved, That the future funding needs for ETL be considered by the Board of Parish Education so that this project may be part of the synodical work program. [ Proceedings. page 131] C. Report of Social Concerns Committee The Social Concerns Committee (SCC) has functioned as an auxiliary committee of the CTCR since its merger with that commission in 1973. Appointed by the CTCR, the SCC’s purpose is to assist the CTCR in its assigned task of “sugges- ting and outlining studies of contemporary issues... as they affect the church, and as the church may affect such social issues” (Bylaw 2.109 b 1 dd). The committee is made up of nine members, all serving two-year appointments. Members serving on the SCC during this biennium were Dr. Eugene Linse (chairman), Dr. V. Jean Garton (secretary), Dr. Richard Bardolph (CTCR liaison), Dr. Henry Eggold, Rev. Eugene Gruell, Dr. Frederick Hofmeister, Dr. Gilbert Meilaender, Dr. Martin Scharlemann, and Mrs. Mable Warnke. Staff services to the committee are supplied by Dr. Samuel Nafzger and Rev. Jerald Joersz. While the commit- tee normally meets four times a year, the SCC met only six times during this past biennium, in order to conserve funds. The “Report on Euthanasia with Guiding Principles”’ pre- pared by the SCC was adopted by the CTCR in the spring of 1979 and mailed to all pastors, teachers, and congregations of the Synod in the fall of 1979. Excerpts from this report were printed in the November 1979 issue of the Lutheran Witness. The document was given extensive coverage by George Cornell of the Associated Press in midsummer 1980, resulting in requests from doctors, hospitals, and others connected with the medical profession. The SCC has been informed that numerous requests were also received from pastors in other Lutheran synods. Two documents, previously prepared by the SCC, the 1976 ‘Report on Capital Punishment” and the 1976 ‘‘Report on the Equal Rights Amendment,” have been reissued by the CTCR and published in brochure form by Concordia Publishing House. These reports had been published previously in the Lutheran Witness. Because of extensive changes in law and society since the publication of the CTCR’s 1971 report “Abortion: Theological, Legal, and Medical Aspects” and the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion, the SCC is developing a new document on abortion. It will incorporate some of the concerns of the church resulting from widely legalized abortion and will reflect the position of the LCMS as expressed in 1979 Res. 3-02A, “To State Position on Abortion.” In the interest of encouraging the members of the Synod to continue and increase their protest against abortion on demand and their witness to the sanctity of all human life, the SCC has recommended to the Synod a