# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1947_S276 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 276. PARISH EDUCATION tivities of the Association of Lutheran Secondary Schools, par- ticipating in workshops for research in teaching religion and helping to finance a study of students’ reactions to certain ques- tions regarding the content of the religion courses at Lutheran high schools. Since the Saginaw directive divided the responsibility for the promotion of high schools between the Board for Parish Educa- tion and the Board for Higher Education, it was felt that some clarification of the respective responsibilities of each board was necessary. Accordingly, a joint meeting of the two boards was held. In view of the difficulty of joint promotion of Lutheran high schools, Dr. J. W. Behnken ruled that the Saginaw directive should be interpreted to mean “That the synodical Board for Parish Education in consultation with the Board for Higher Edu- cation be definitely instructed to enter upon active support of a program of general education on the high school level.” This ruling was agreeable to both boards, and the following four Statements were adopted by the boards to clarify their respective responsibilities in this area: 1. The Board for Higher Education has jurisdiction over the high school departments at our synodical schools. 2, Since the Board for Higher Education has been assigned a jurisdiction over synodical teacher training, any potential pro- We gram for synodically trained high school teachers is the concern of the Board for Higher Education. 3. The Board for Parish Education has the responsibility to carry out the three resolutions of Synod (1944) re: Lutheran secondary schools, promoting and guiding this work as it promotes and guides the work of our elementary schools. 4. As long as Lutheran high schools are in the nature of con- gregational projects, the Board for Higher Education has no direct Be contact with them; they are under the supervision of the Board Ss Na Parish Education. ‘4 With this clarification of its responsibilities, the Board for Parish Education increased its activity in behalf of Lutheran high schools. The Board first sought the assistance of District Boards of Christian Education in surveying their respective fields. Some Districts had indeed given leadership in this area, but not all District boards were assuming this responsibility. At the joint meeting of the Board for Parish Education and the Board for Higher Education it was emphasized that local high schools are under the general supervision of the District boards. In view of this fact District Presidents were to be urged to have congrega-