# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1947_S184 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 150 SEMINARIES AND COLLEGES which Synod requested the Board to furnish and which un- questionably involve far-reaching consequences for the future welfare and development of our Church. The same importance attaches to the Senior College problem which is discussed in con- siderable detail in the Board’s current Report. Your Board desires to direct special attention also to the observations made under the title: Resident Student Counselors. Synod’s action on this proposal may well involve a major advance in our entire approach to the problem of ministerial training. Under God’s blessing the operation of the system proposed could effect profound changes in the spiritual, professional, and cultural concepts of our graduates. As another major project, your Board has undertaken a restudy and restatement of the Objectives of Ministerial Training as ordered by the Saginaw Convention. The results of its study have been incorporated in the Board’s report on the Senior College. It appears to the Board that these Objectives of Ministerial Training consti- tute the ultimately determining factor in any evaluation of proposals to establish a Senior College or any other modifications of Synod’s system of ministerial training. In the opinion of your Board, the Objectives deserve separate publication and consideration. While it is certainly not required that there be complete agree- ment with the Board’s conclusions relative to the many practical recommendations conveyed to Synod, ways must be found to agree on basic Objectives. The future development of our edu- cational system depends on a clear concept of the objectives to be reached, and under God the: correctness of these concepts as well as the thoroughness and vigor of their implementation will be major human factors which condition the doctrinal attitudes and the practical effectiveness of our future pastors and teachers. No separate report is given on the File of Personal and Aca- demic Data on potential faculty personnel. Your Board is happy to state that the file is established and in use. In addition to complete information relevant to present faculty members, more than 125 sets of data are already available. There has been splendid co-operation by the brethren involved and by those to whom it was necessary to send reference inquiries. The information is being made available to persons authorized to call or appoint teaching personnel at synodical institutions in accordance with the directive of the Synod of 1941. We regret that it has not yet been possible to work out satis- factory detail on the matter of Sabbatical Leaves and of subsidies to encourage greater Attendance at Professional Meetings. Your Board is confident that further consultation with the Board of